Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] vim: workaround nawk dependency problem with RPM

2013-09-08 Thread Peter A. Bigot
Ping? I see this is marked as New, Archived in patchwork so it doesn't show up for merge, but can't tell how it got archived. Is there something wrong with it? On 09/03/2013 02:04 PM, Peter A. Bigot wrote: One of the examples has a #!/usr/bin/nawk which tells RPM to add that as a dep, which

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] vim: workaround nawk dependency problem with RPM

2013-09-08 Thread Martin Jansa
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 07:57:47AM -0500, Peter A. Bigot wrote: Ping? I see this is marked as New, Archived in patchwork so it doesn't show up for merge, but can't tell how it got archived. Is there something wrong with it? It's in jansa/in-test bundle, see

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] vim: workaround nawk dependency problem with RPM

2013-09-03 Thread Peter A. Bigot
One of the examples has a #!/usr/bin/nawk which tells RPM to add that as a dep, which we don't want. Signed-off-by: Peter A. Bigot p...@pabigot.com --- meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim.inc | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim.inc