[oe] [meta-openwrt] PV for git versions for 17.01.4 upstream release, git for master?

2018-01-21 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
Hi, Wondering thoughts on using a package version with the git revisions of openwrt recipes that are in current stable (17.01.4) and using _git version for tracking upstream master? Also in that case would it be necessary to use PREFERRED_VERSION for in e.g. openwrt.bbclass, or it a versione

Re: [oe] [meta-openwrt] PV for git versions for 17.01.4 upstream release, git for master?

2018-01-21 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
On 21/01/18 11:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote: Hi, Wondering thoughts on using a package version with the git revisions of openwrt recipes that are in current stable (17.01.4) and using _git version for tracking upstream master? Also in that

Re: [oe] [meta-openwrt] PV for git versions for 17.01.4 upstream release, git for master?

2018-01-21 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
On 22/01/18 12:36 AM, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote: [snip] Probably weakly define a global openwrt version e.g. OPENWRT_VERSION in layer.conf have two versions of recipes one for master and another one for release. OPENWRT_VERSION then can be overridden in local.conf if someone does not want to use

[oe] [meta-oe] add-layers fails with python error

2018-01-22 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
I'm not sure which list this belongs on, but since it's an attempt to use meta-oe that triggers the error, I post it here. I've seen others reporting this issue prior to this, so perhaps it's related to the build environment? (I'm on Debian 9). Steps: Checkout bitbake branch 1.34 (also occu

Re: [oe] [meta-oe] add-layers fails with python error

2018-01-22 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
On 23/01/18 01:50 AM, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote: I'm not sure which list this belongs on, but since it's an attempt to use meta-oe that triggers the error, I post it here.  I've seen others reporting this issue prior to this, so perhaps it's related to the build environmen

Re: [oe] [meta-oe] add-layers fails with python error

2018-01-23 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
On 23/01/18 02:30 AM, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote: On 23/01/18 01:50 AM, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote: I'm not sure which list this belongs on, but since it's an attempt to use meta-oe that triggers the error, I post it here.  I've seen others reporting this issue prior to this,

[oe] Found offending commit: oe-core: 7267e7c000c76c44d09835d4cd2bc485b6a39a2a (was Re: [meta-oe] add-layers fails with python error)

2018-01-23 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
On 23/01/18 04:19 AM, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote: On 23/01/18 02:30 AM, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote: On 23/01/18 01:50 AM, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote: I'm not sure which list this belongs on, but since it's an attempt to use meta-oe that triggers the error, I post it here.  I'

[oe] Per-binary-package LICENSE? and/or dependent on PACKAGECONFIG?

2018-01-29 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
Hi all, I have a question about packages which by default don't ship e.g. LGPL code in their binaries, but if a configure option is turned on then the package generates examples / test programs that are LGPL (in this case due to a shell script from shunit2). How can you define the LICENSE so

Re: [oe] Per-binary-package LICENSE? and/or dependent on PACKAGECONFIG?

2018-01-30 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
On 30/01/18 01:50 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On 1/29/18 5:38 PM, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote: Hi all, I have a question about packages which by default don't ship e.g. LGPL code in their binaries, but if a configure option is turned on then the package generates examples / test programs tha

Re: [oe] [meta-openwrt][PATCH 1/5] openwrt-lua: remove hardcoded 'lib' string to a generic value CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR

2018-03-02 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
Hi! Great to see someone else interested in meta-openwrt! I'll try and look at these this weekend. I noticed Khem asked for a PR on GitHub. If you're not comfortable with that I can help, otherwise look forward to seeing your PR on github! Regards, Daniel On 2018-03-01 08:35 AM, Jagadee

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/1] hostapd: not compatible with openssl-no-weak-ciphers

2018-03-13 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
On 2018-03-13 10:15 PM, Joe Slater wrote: Use CONFLICT_DISTRO_FEATURES to not build if des is not supported. Signed-off-by: Joe Slater --- meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/hostapd/hostapd_2.6.bb | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/

[oe] [meta-xvisor] Working on layer to build Xvisor and guests

2018-04-22 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
Hi all, FYI I am currently working on a layer, meta-xvisor, for building Xvisor (https://xhypervisor.com); repo is at git://github.com/cshoredaniel/meta-xvisor.git), and have a few questions: Xvisor is basically an alternate kernel (it's a standalone Type-1 hypervisor), but configuration and

[oe] [meta-xvisor] [Status] Generation of x86-64 XVisor-only (no guests) hd images is working

2018-05-10 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
Hi all, FYI, I now have meta-xvisor successfully going from scratch to a fully built OE cross compiling toolchain and an ext4 disk image with syslinux which uses the mboot.c32 to use multiboot to boot the XVisor hypervisor. I'll write up the docs for things so far sometime soon (I hope). The

Re: [oe] [meta-openwrt][PATCH] [hostapd]: Update patch based on 2.6 version

2018-05-10 Thread Daniel F. Dickinson
On 2018-03-19 12:50 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On 3/18/18 9:49 AM, Parthiban Nallathambi wrote: Update the existing patch to work for hostapd 2.6 (which is the current version of openembedded-core rocko branch). "netifd.sh" is no more part of hostapd source, so removing it from do_install section of