Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

> That leaves only few issues in our internal components and strange failure > with perf which fails to include various header files: > perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/util/include/asm/byteorder.h:2:10: fatal > error: ../../../../include/uapi/linux/swab.h: No such file or directory >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 09:11:45PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > > 5) nativesdk-libxcrypt fails to build (not sure which change caused >> > > this, it build OK with sumo since the -std=gnu99 addition. >> > >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 09:11:45PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > 5) nativesdk-libxcrypt fails to build (not sure which change caused > > > this, it build OK with sumo since the -std=gnu99 addition. > > > ../git/crypt-sunmd5.c:189:13: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated > > > before the

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:33:41AM -0600, Dan McGregor wrote: > On 10 May 2018 at 12:53, Khem Raj wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > > > Thanks for testing > > > > On 5/10/18 7:34 AM, Dan McGregor wrote: > >> > >> On 4 May 2018 at 18:26, Khem Raj wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On 10 May 2018 at 12:53, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for testing > > On 5/10/18 7:34 AM, Dan McGregor wrote: >> >> On 4 May 2018 at 18:26, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> Hi All >>> >>> As you might have noticed that gcc 8.1 was released this week, I am

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

Hi Ross I pushed a few more fixes to branch which fixes kernel build issue ovmf build issue python2 build issue (your fix) I could not reproduce the mesa issues that is shown on AB With this I think we should be in better shape. Can you retry

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

Hi Ross Thanks for testing I looked at failures and one of them is RESULTS - kernelmodule.KernelModuleTest.test_kernel_module - Testcase 1541: FAILED and this is the compile error. pager.c: In function 'pager_preexec': pager.c:36:12: error: passing argument 2 to restrict-qualified parameter

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

I threw the branch at the Yocto Project autobuilder today, produced a number of failures: http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Latest//?filter=b23dba19607412c8cc7d267d95354d65f5631088=commit Ross On 5 May 2018 at 01:26, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi All > > As you might have

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Andre McCurdy

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Khem Raj

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Andre McCurdy

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Martin Jansa

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote:

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Martin Jansa

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 04:11:00PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> >>

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 04:11:00PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Martin Jansa > >> wrote:

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > see >> >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > see > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-May/150654.html > > Removing -fno-omit-frame-pointer isn't the same as adding >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > see > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-May/150654.html Removing -fno-omit-frame-pointer isn't the same as adding -fomit-frame-pointer. Frame pointers may get enabled depending on the

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

see http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-May/150654.html On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:38 AM Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Martin Jansa > wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:43:25PM +0200, Martin

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:43:25PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:27:50PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Martin Jansa >> > wrote:

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:43:25PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:27:50PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Martin Jansa >> > wrote:

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:43:25PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:27:50PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Martin Jansa > > wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:50:02AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > >> Hi Martin >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:27:50PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:50:02AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> Hi Martin > >> > >> Thanks for testing and reporting back > >> > >> On 5/9/18 2:38 AM,

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:50:02AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> Hi Martin >> >> Thanks for testing and reporting back >> >> On 5/9/18 2:38 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > My initial tests show couple issues, but usually

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:50:02AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi Martin > > Thanks for testing and reporting back > > On 5/9/18 2:38 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > My initial tests show couple issues, but usually caused by other changes > > in that branch, not the gcc-8 itself. > > > > 1)

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

Hi Dan, Thanks for testing On 5/10/18 7:34 AM, Dan McGregor wrote: On 4 May 2018 at 18:26, Khem Raj wrote: Hi All As you might have noticed that gcc 8.1 was released this week, I am calling out for some testing help on testing branch so we can weed out issues you might

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

Hi Martin Thanks for testing and reporting back On 5/9/18 2:38 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: My initial tests show couple issues, but usually caused by other changes in that branch, not the gcc-8 itself. 1) strace-4.22 from

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

On 4 May 2018 at 18:26, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi All > > As you might have noticed that gcc 8.1 was released this week, I am > calling out for some testing help on testing branch so we can weed out > issues you might see in your setups. so if you have your > builders idling over

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

My initial tests show couple issues, but usually caused by other changes in that branch, not the gcc-8 itself. 1) strace-4.22 from http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/gcc-8=af33a8b721cc9caebd3f5226b4c5903f666ab654 fails to build with ptest enabled (it builds with