Re: [oe] [meta-handheld][PATCH] zaurusd: refresh patches (using devtool)
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:23:39AM +0200, Andrea Adami wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Koen Kooi> wrote: > > Op 10-04-18 om 23:01 schreef Andrea Adami: > >> Silence warnings about ingnored context. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andrea Adami > > > > > >> --- a/recipes-bsp/zaurusd/zaurusd/0001-zaurusd-add-support-for-collie.patch > >> +++ b/recipes-bsp/zaurusd/zaurusd/0001-zaurusd-add-support-for-collie.patch > >> @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@ > >> -From 85b94bed1feab70bc529a59fb80c26da825b9abe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> +From 668a7bc50ca8f36df5a0eae73a5fa251aada9cc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > >> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 16:00:10 +0400 > >> Subject: [PATCH] zaurusd: add support for collie > >> -Upstream-Status: Pending > > Was that change intended? > > No, not really. > Let say I have spotted it and planned to read the devtool code... > > I think it is tolerable in this context, because unfortunately not all > patches have Upstream-Status. > (I am wondering if there is still Upstream for zaurusd...) > > So I have left the result unchanged., planning to update the > Upstream-Status soon. Related, but not exactly the same: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12674 Basically, in your case Upstream-status was above the empty line that separates patch header and patch description. Upstream-status should be in the patch description or it will be lost by devtool... -- Denys -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-handheld][PATCH] zaurusd: refresh patches (using devtool)
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Koen Kooiwrote: > Op 10-04-18 om 23:01 schreef Andrea Adami: >> Silence warnings about ingnored context. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrea Adami > > >> --- a/recipes-bsp/zaurusd/zaurusd/0001-zaurusd-add-support-for-collie.patch >> +++ b/recipes-bsp/zaurusd/zaurusd/0001-zaurusd-add-support-for-collie.patch >> @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@ >> -From 85b94bed1feab70bc529a59fb80c26da825b9abe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> +From 668a7bc50ca8f36df5a0eae73a5fa251aada9cc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov >> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 16:00:10 +0400 >> Subject: [PATCH] zaurusd: add support for collie >> -Upstream-Status: Pending > Was that change intended? No, not really. Let say I have spotted it and planned to read the devtool code... I think it is tolerable in this context, because unfortunately not all patches have Upstream-Status. (I am wondering if there is still Upstream for zaurusd...) So I have left the result unchanged., planning to update the Upstream-Status soon. Cheers Andrea > > -- > ___ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-handheld][PATCH] zaurusd: refresh patches (using devtool)
Op 10-04-18 om 23:01 schreef Andrea Adami: > Silence warnings about ingnored context. > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Adami> --- a/recipes-bsp/zaurusd/zaurusd/0001-zaurusd-add-support-for-collie.patch > +++ b/recipes-bsp/zaurusd/zaurusd/0001-zaurusd-add-support-for-collie.patch > @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@ > -From 85b94bed1feab70bc529a59fb80c26da825b9abe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > +From 668a7bc50ca8f36df5a0eae73a5fa251aada9cc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 16:00:10 +0400 > Subject: [PATCH] zaurusd: add support for collie > -Upstream-Status: Pending Was that change intended? -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel