Guewen Baconnier @ Camptocamp has proposed merging
lp:~camptocamp/openerp-product-attributes/7.0-attribute-set-create-1256023 into
lp:openerp-product-attributes.
Commit message:
[FIX] prevent KeyError if no 'attribute_ids' is present in 'vals'
Requested reviews:
Product Core Editors
Review: Approve code review, no test
LGTM
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/openerp-product-attributes/7.0-attribute-set-create-1256023/+merge/197092
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch
lp:openerp-product-attributes.
___
Review: Approve code review, no test
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/openerp-product-attributes/7.0-attribute-set-create-1256023/+merge/197092
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch
lp:openerp-product-attributes.
___
Mailing
Review: Approve (code review, no test)
LGTM
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/openerp-product-attributes/7.0-attribute-set-create-1256023/+merge/197092
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch
lp:openerp-product-attributes.
___
Hi, community!
I want to announce to you one initiative that
Avanzoschttp://www.avanzosc.es/and
I http://serviciosbaeza.com/en/ have launched today: a crowdfunding
campaign to migrate and enhance modules that extend manufacturing features
of OpenERP. We have called it with the original name
Title: Eric CAUDAL
Hi Pedro,
That sounds like a good initiative.
We can help on definition and of course with the many
contributions done so far (split MO, split procurement, automatic
MO etc.).
Besides it would be interesting to know what are the
Thanks for the patch, merged in 7.0
revno: 9657 [merge]
revision-id: m...@openerp.com-20131128113232-aun2h9fbrfxwffqt
** Changed in: openobject-addons
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenERP
Community Backports
https://bitbucket.org/jurko/suds/src/627c4f4e2aed730aab9d0632fab9ac7383c74230/
suds/client.py?at=default#cl-676
I'm receiving this kind of Exceptions from suds. I fear, it isn't fully
implemented yet.
Arg. Ok, so :-)
--
The proposal to merge lp:~camptocamp/margin-analysis/7.0-pending-merge into
lp:margin-analysis has been updated.
Description changed to:
* Improve logger
* Add a basic YML test case for product_historical_margin
* Propagate the context on browse
* Improve the usability of
Hi Pedro,
I can't find how to solve these conflicts... Could you (or any other fellow
bzr guru) please enlighten me ?
Regards,
-Mario
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~the-clone-master/oemedical/oemedical_module_split/+merge/196469
Your team OEmedical Commiter is subscribed to branch
Review: Needs Fixing
Hi, Joël, thanks for the contribution. Can you please check:
- l.74: You forget the ')' at the end.
- l.98: 'products' is not a list?
- l.173, l.177: Can you use DATETIME variable?
And now a little off-topic: I'm seeing some MPs for your part with history
properties. Don't
You can make this:
- Execute this command over your branch:
bzr diff -r x..y diff.patch
where x and y are the revisions where your changes starts and ends
respectively. Make sure you don't forget any revision.
- Then, take official branch and apply the patch:
patch -p0 diff.patch
i have fix it and have PEP8 fully covered
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~initos.com/account-analytic/7.0/+merge/195362
Your team Account Core Editors is subscribed to branch lp:account-analytic.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community-reviewer
Post to :
Guewen Baconnier @ Camptocamp has proposed merging
lp:~camptocamp/openerp-product-attributes/7.0-attribute-set-create-1256023 into
lp:openerp-product-attributes.
Commit message:
[FIX] prevent KeyError if no 'attribute_ids' is present in 'vals'
Requested reviews:
Product Core Editors
Review: Needs Information
Hi,
About the debate on init function :
Why not doing the following :
1/ keep the code :
- _defaults [...]
- def _allow_date_always_active [...]
- _constraints [...]
2/ remove the code :
- def init [...]
the init function only does a mass edit, it isn't ? So it's
@Nhomar :
I don't understand your answer. My collegues at Akretion France don't
understand it either. Could you explain it again ?
@Sylvain :
Of course, I could use the mass edit module to set all journals to
allow_date=True. But it find your suggestion too complicated for such a simple
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~vauxoo/account-financial-report/7.0-afr_GB_partner-dev-hbto/+merge/196764
Your team Account Report Core Editors is subscribed to branch
lp:account-financial-report.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community-reviewer
Post to :
Review: Approve
Now same report but with partner data like account (without a particular
partner's account.account, only with res.partner)
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~vauxoo/account-financial-report/7.0-afr_GB_partner-dev-hbto/+merge/196764
Your team Account Report Core Editors is
Review: Abstain
I still see some lines very long, but it's better than previously. I'm going to
abstain for now, until I have some time to check it functionally.
Regards.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~vauxoo/account-financial-report/7.0-afr_GB_partner-dev-hbto/+merge/196764
Your team Account
The proposal to merge
lp:~vauxoo/account-financial-report/7.0-afr_GB_partner-dev-hbto into
lp:account-financial-report has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Merged
For more details, see:
Review: Approve
Thanks for the MP, Etienne.
Regards.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~hirt/ocb-addons/6.1_fix_mailaddress-parsing/+merge/194030
Your team OpenERP Community Backports Team is subscribed to branch
lp:ocb-addons/6.1.
--
Mailing list:
21 matches
Mail list logo
