Vincent, Pedro,
We also need this module shortly. sale_order_recalculate_prices
https://github.com/odoomrp/odoomrp-wip/tree/8.0/sale_order_recalculate_prices
looks
fine at first glance.
Who is going doing the PR to OCA? To which repository?
Best regards,
-sbi
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:38 PM,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Pedro Manuel Baeza Romero
pedro.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
I can do it today, and I understand that it should be at sale-workflow.
Doesn't it?
Regards.
I would have chosen sale-workflow too.
-sbi
___
Mailing list:
Hello Nicolas,
In my opinion, there is no urgency to mandate porting existing modules to
the new API.
In the short to medium term I see benefits to keeping modules compatible /
similar between 7.0 and 8.0 branches.
Same argument for new modules that start their life on the 7.0 branch.
Best
Hello,
+1 for rst/sphinx/readthedocs for technical documentation.
Regarding functional documentation, we are investigating a way to use the
v8 website editor to create contextual functional documentation that the
users would be able to maintain themselves. We envision the possibility to
let
Hi,
I notice https://launchpad.net/openerp-pos has only two unmerged branches,
and is not listed in the lp to github migration dashboard [1].
I assume it is the right time to create the project on github and on
http://odoo-community.org/page/website.List?
If there is agreement on this, would a
Hi Nicolas,
I'm curious to see which tests fails due to account_constraint. Do you have
a pointer?
Could the incompatibilities be resolved by adapting the failing tests to
satisfy the constraints?
-sbi
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Nicolas Bessi nicolas.be...@camptocamp.com
wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
I confirm what I wrote on Saturday.
Therefore +1 to migrate all branches to github ASAP.
-sbi
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Guewen Baconnier
guewen.baconn...@camptocamp.com wrote:
Hi,
There is still one point that is not totally clear yet, that is wether
we migrate only the 8.0
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Joël Grand-Guillaume
joel.grandguilla...@camptocamp.com wrote:
I tend to think that if you create you own branch, not sure you can then
make a pull request on the official branch because the parent will not be
the same... But I'm not sure. In the worst case,
Hi,
Some comments about migration strategy below.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Guewen Baconnier
guewen.baconn...@camptocamp.com wrote:
The decisions discussed so far
==
- The branches up to 7.0 will stay on Launchpad
Though, they will be mirrored on
...@gmail.com:
I'm making again the merges of these 4 MPs.
Regards.
2014-06-18 11:53 GMT+02:00 Stefan ste...@therp.nl:
On 18-06-14 09:36, Bidoul, Stéphane wrote:
Hi,
On Friday June 13th, I received a notification from launchpad saying
that 13 revisions were removed from lp:ocaddons/7.0
Hi Eric,
I did a quick scan of our code that could depend on that and at first
glance I would see no issue with cost_method becoming a property.
Regards,
-sbi
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Eric Caudal eric.cau...@elico-corp.com
wrote:
Hi,
Currently Odoo 7 doesnot handle properly 2 type
Hi,
On Friday June 13th, I received a notification from launchpad saying that
13 revisions were removed from lp:ocaddons/7.0.
Apparently some recent (and important) merges went out.
See for instance, this [1] comment from Guewen.
Does anyone know what happened or has information to help
Stefan's approach has my vote. Keep = 7.0 on lauchpad and use github for
= 8.0.
Cheers,
-sbi
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Stefan Rijnhart ste...@therp.nl wrote:
Hi Joël,
Maybe I don't understand, but having one addon per repo does that mean
that when an API change requires a change
+1 for account_partner_required on the same principle as
account_analytic_required.
Since I had something like that in mind since some time. I'll do a merge
proposal.
-sbi
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Frédéric Clementi
frederic.cleme...@camptocamp.com wrote:
account_constaints will not
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Alexandre Fayolle
alexandre.fayo...@camptocamp.com wrote:
Weaknesses found so far: [...], and testing all available modules is not
easy (yet). But we are working on it.
Hi Alexandre,
Have you tried post-buildout-steps = openerpcommand-initialize-tests?
It's
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Alexandre Fayolle
alexandre.fayo...@camptocamp.com wrote:
Do you know if it does the same thing as the runbot (filter out some
black listed addons with known failing tests to keep the build green)?
(cf.
Hi Eric,
Is this what you are looking for?
https://www.openerp.com/apps/7.0/base_optional_quick_create/
-sbi
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Eric Caudal eric.cau...@elico-corp.comwrote:
I am getting old and my memory is not what it used but I am quite sure I
have seen some reference in
Hi,
Some community modules are incompatible with each other, or with core
modules. It may not be desirable but it is sometimes unavoidable and is a
fact today. Discovering such incompatibilities is a painful process, and
there is no structured mechanism to communicate about them once they have
Hi Fabien,
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Fabien Pinckaers f...@openerp.com wrote:
Hi,
Some community modules are incompatible with each other, or with core
modules. It may not be desirable but it is sometimes unavoidable and is a
fact today.
Do you have some examples of incompatible
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Maxime Chambreuil
maxime.chambre...@savoirfairelinux.com wrote:
I agree with Fabien. Having this conflicts field will also legitimate
incompatibilities and they will remain forever.
Not having this field will force people to collaborate and solve the
Etienne,
You may want to look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062258 regarding
file storage in 6.1.
-sbi
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Etienne Hirt h...@art-of-technology.chwrote:
Dear all,
Looking at the external file storage in 6.0/6.1 I found that:
* the same file can be added
Hello Guewen,
That's fine with me. I indeed thought 7.0 and trunk series were the same
branch.
-sbi
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Guewen Baconnier
guewen.baconn...@camptocamp.com wrote:
Hello,
I noticed some inconsistencies in the series of the project
account-financial-report in
22 matches
Mail list logo
