On 03/30/2015 11:06 AM, Pedro Manuel Baeza Romero wrote:
I don't understand. Module /report_webkit/ is still on official repository
(https://github.com/odoo/odoo/tree/8.0/addons/report_webkit). It seems that the
move has been delayed until 9.0. Why do you need to copy it to another place?
Security Advisory 2014-01-safe-eval
Title: Arbitrary code execution using safe eval expressions
Affects: All Odoo (formerly OpenERP) versions
Component: Odoo Server
Credit: duesenfranz
GitHub: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/3445
I. Background
Odoo
Dear Community,
Odoo 8 has just been released!
You can try it online immediately on https://www.odoo.com/start and download
the final release on https://www.odoo.com/page/download
More information:
- Announce: http://bit.ly/1miy5K2
- Presentation:
Hi everyone!
Here's another quick update about the 8.0 release status.
- Odoo.com has been running on 8.0 RC1 for several weeks and has become quite
stable after a lot of improvements and corrections.
- The translation teams have been doing an incredible job and several teams
have almost
Dear contributors and translators,
As you know, we're working hard to prepare the v8 release and make it as stable
as possible. We've done a lot of progress and we're reaching the point where we
plan to migrate odoo.com to 8.0RC. It should be done next week if everything
goes well.
This
Thanks, btw you're welcome to commit directly in the branch.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/openobject-doc/6.1-add-outdated-links-warning-lep/+merge/229473
Your team OpenERP Community is requested to review the proposed merge of
Hi,
Quick update on the 8.0 release progress:
- the migration scripts for 8.0 are finished, and Odoo.com should be upgraded
in the coming days
- the new packaging is almost finished, new nightly builds should appear soon
on nightly.odoo.com
- the export of the translations is being worked on,
On 06/18/2014 07:01 PM, Oscar Alcala wrote:
The odoo team already did some improvements on the search Omnibox:
Inline image 2
This is a great feature, but I still think that can it can get better
it feels really weird clicking on a dropdown and suddenly seeing a
On 06/19/2014 12:21 PM, Ana Juaristi wrote:
Hello everybody:
My feeling is that Oscar's idea would be really usefull for old and new users.
Very simple case of use (now testing projects/tasks) on Odoo:
I want to look for tasks of a single project.
I need doing this actions on screen:
1. click
On 06/19/2014 01:27 PM, Pedro Manuel Baeza Romero wrote:
I agree with Olivier that the way to go if you want to search directly for
certain field is to include it as a search field on the view, and going down
with the arrows, but please improve saved filters, recreating in the same form
as you
Merged in 7.0 on github at
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/5d77de54e5c1b7465d133e508f8986b8249e0368.
Thanks!
** Changed in: openobject-addons
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: openobject-addons
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because
On 06/10/2014 04:08 PM, Sandy Carter wrote:
Slashes in git branch names can cause problems with some helper tools as
it messes up the .git/refs/ directory.
That's exactly why we have decided to avoid it ;-)
___
Mailing list:
On 06/06/2014 11:28 AM, Yann Papouin wrote:
According to the transition wiki page:
LP bugs stay on LP, but no new ones. New bugs = GitHub issues
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/wiki/GitHub-Transition
The top of the transition page is just a summary with links to more detailed
sections further
On 05/22/2014 09:44 AM, Nhomar Hernández wrote:
Oliver.
What about lp:openobject-doc?
We'll probably move it to a separate GitHub repo, because it could benefit from
the online preview and edit capabilities there. I don't suppose many people
depend on it being at its current location.
We
On 05/22/2014 11:01 PM, Graeme Gellatly wrote:
Just a question about transition to github and the single branch. Should we
consider renaming addons b4 v8 release?, seems a funny name now given we talk
of apps and modules and they are core to using the software not really an add
on.
The
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Nhomar Hernández nho...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-23 12:51 GMT-05:00 Olivier Dony o...@openerp.com:
Yes we'll create similar labels, this will be defined soon and the process
explained on the wiki.
Cfr https://github.com/odoo/odoo/wiki/GitHub-Transition#bug
On 05/21/2014 12:24 PM, Moises Lopez wrote:
Where you comment:
3. Runbot [In Progress]
New runbot with GitHub integration will be ready soon.
Will you add support for GitHub repositories while preserving bzr compatibility
too?
The new runbot currently only supports GitHub, and it's not sure
Hi everyone,
The transition from Launchpad to GitHub has just been announced, and it raises
many questions.
First of all: Don't Panic!(TM) We should not lose anything in the process, and
no urgent action is required on your side.
The new Odoo wiki at GitHub attempts to give a comprehensive
On 05/09/2014 04:52 PM, Ana Juaristi wrote:
Just a very simple question... is there anyway to embed a video (youtube, flash
or so on) using only V8 website builder on user level? That is without editing
html view? is there any widget that allows doing that? On the other side... How
could upload
Thanks Stefan for the bug report and the excellent fix, as usual!
Your patch was merged in 7.0 at revision 10031 rev-id
o...@openerp.com-20140505075129-hv4evrdw5v7crtmw.
** Changed in: openobject-addons
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: openobject-addons
Status: New = Fix
On 03/31/2014 03:24 PM, Lionel Sausin wrote:
Le 31/03/2014 14:57, Lionel Sausin a écrit :
Dear Olivier,
In v7 I just noticed that check_recursion() is deprecated in favor of
_check_recursion().
That makes it a protected method, so by convention it should only be
used inside osv.orm shouldn't
** No longer affects: openobject-server/6.0
** No longer affects: openobject-server/trunk
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenERP
Community Backports Team, which is subscribed to OpenERP Community
Backports (Server).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971412
This has finally been fixed in server trunk (v8) at revision [1], thanks
to Lionel's merge proposal!
[1] 5140 rev-id j...@openerp.com-20140320090105-fl2jt7hhplwu6dgr
** Changed in: openobject-server
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: openobject-server
Milestone: None
On 02/05/2014 08:26 AM, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
There is also a fairly active chan #openobject on irc.freenode.org (which could
do with more active experienced developers, including people from OpenERP SA)
For the record, we've recently added #openobject to BotBot, so we now have a
nice
On 01/20/2014 10:13 PM, Kurt Haselwimmer wrote:
Say I create a new feature for the webstore, say even - the shipment tracking
feature I described - whereby I can store parameter trackno, together with a
courier choice, such that the URL www.courier.com/tracking.asp?id=%s
On 01/15/2014 03:56 PM, Axel Mendoza Pupo wrote:
This bug is related with search on model res.partner when the module portal is
installed because of an ir.rule of res.partner in that module security
Suppose that there is an extension of res.partner that add one or more many2one
fields to
Hi,
This has been fixed in addons 7.0 at revision 9764 rev-id:
o...@openerp.com-20140115093120-r2u2bmms9y847b93, using the corrected
email_split function. As a result, updating both server and addons 7.0 to the
latest version will get you the complete fix.
Concerning the server-part of the big
Hi everyone,
Thanks for your feedback! Xavier has done a great job and provided a simple
implementation that covers the main contact management feature that is not
covered in the standard v7 distribution: the ability to easily link a single
person to multiple companies, while maintaining the
** Changed in: openobject-addons
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenERP
Community Backports Team, which is subscribed to OpenERP Community
Backports (Addons).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238525
Title:
[7.0] Wrong
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Moises Lopez moylop...@vauxoo.com wrote:
@Fabien,
You told us
And this is the main reason why you need to register a *team*, and not a
branch. This allows to control feature-branches are green before merging
them.
...
We generate branches with
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Moises Lopez moylop...@vauxoo.com wrote:
Hello Oliver,
Current openerp-runbot there is hard-code for sticky branches.
Actually, this can be configured dynamically too. But first the team config
must be clean.
I modified this file for explain this point:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Joël Grand-Guillaume
joel.grandguilla...@camptocamp.com wrote:
Dear all,
A bit late, but better late than never... I completly share Stefan's
vision here. I'm also inline with what suggested Olivier during the
community days ans I'm also happy to see this
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Stefan ste...@therp.nl wrote:
Hi,
to put this discussion in perspective, let me give an overview of which
schema changes have been put through in ocb-addons/7.0 so far:
- An 'active' field was added to account.journal
- A sequence field was added to
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Stefan Rijnhart ste...@therp.nl wrote:
On 10/28/2013 08:30 PM, Olivier Dony wrote:
So it's very simple: if the OCB contributors find it useful to have a
faster commit path to the stable branches, then they might find that
respecting the stable policy somehow
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Stefan Rijnhart ste...@therp.nl wrote:
On 10/28/2013 11:07 PM, Fabien Pinckaers wrote:
- one can not use it in production since you can not easily do bzr pull
to apply latest bugfixes
I don't even know what you mean by this. I pull OCB-branches on a daily
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Holger Brunn hbr...@therp.nl wrote:
In https://bugs.launchpad.net/ocb-server/+bug/1170129, I went through the
pain
to find out the revision from which on it went wrong, the same has yet to
be
done with openobject-addons.
Now my question is: How did 7.0's
On 2013-10-25 14:30, Fabien Pinckaers wrote:
Ok, I checked with Olivier and Christophe; It looks like OCB branches
have been wrongly registered in our runbot by a partner.
IMHO, the community should organize OCB branches in another way:
- a dedicated ~ocb team
- but uses official projects
On 2013-10-25 16:44, Stefan wrote:
On 10/25/2013 04:21 PM, Olivier Dony wrote:
Only a few obstacles remain before this can become a reality:
1/ The OCB branches would need to be relocated under the official
projects
2/ The OCB branch management process needs to be adapted accordingly
3
On 2013-10-25 17:43, Mario Arias wrote:
Reason to be for OCB branches is that official ones are not community
friendly...
* Lots of bugs with even corresponding MPs that are rejected and/or ignored...
* Changes needed to really fix a bug that are not accepted because of the no
change
On 10/01/2013 07:10 PM, ferdinand wrote:
On 10/01/2013 03:16 PM, Olivier Dony wrote:
Is there any new version of one2many_sorted? The one I can see [1] does not
perform any sorting or grouping on the client-side, so it does not seem to
address the limitations I was referring to??
[1]
http
On 10/02/2013 04:50 PM, Raphael Valyi wrote:
just to mention we negociated for Aflex OPW renewal that o2m would be sortable
on client side, it has been written as one of the regression to fix in the
renewal contract to bought to OpenERP. So I think this is related to this: when
you click on the
On 09/24/2013 06:14 PM, ferdinand wrote:
On 09/24/2013 05:05 PM, Olivier Dony wrote:
[1] That's harder than it seems - it requires client-side
logic/grouping because some of the lines in a o2m may be dirty or new,
so the server would be unable to perform the sorting.
that's why the module
On 09/24/2013 10:33 AM, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
* For invoices, the sequence field is there on the lines but not
editable, and only set by default from sale.orders AFAICT.
The preferred method to allow reordering lines is to simply add the `sequence`
field in the editable list view, using
On 09/24/2013 01:38 PM, Alan Lord wrote:
https://lists.launchpad.net/openerp-community/msg01313.html
(4th Oct 2012)...
Interesting that Olivier said in his first reply to this thread that -
line ordering propagates throughout the workflow by default
Yup, as mentioned, that was the plan. And
On 09/16/2013 09:26 AM, Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe informatique
Numérigraphe wrote:
Hi, Personnally, I would most appreciate if you made merge proposals to the
trunk when applicable.
I known OpenERP SA is not reactive to this type of MP's (I have made quite a
few myself that not
On 09/16/2013 02:52 PM, Niels Huylebroeck wrote:
For the rest, it might be better to put them in extra modules and offer a
configuration interface similar to v7's Settings checkboxes, possibly via
an index module, as Niels suggests. But you should watch out for
updatability - a
On 09/16/2013 03:05 PM, Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe informatique
Numérigraphe wrote:
Le 16/09/2013 14:35, Olivier Dony a écrit :
One thing that's easily overlooked is that OpenERP is a very complex piece
of software, and the RD team spent *a lot* of efforts during the last few
years
a fact and doesn't affect any skills or value:
Borja López Soilán : https://launchpad.net/~borjals
Jordi Esteve : jest...@zikzakmedia.com mailto:jest...@zikzakmedia.com
Raphaël Valyi : https://launchpad.net/~rvalyi
Olivier Dony: o...@tinyerp.com mailto:o...@tinyerp.com
I suggest to give them
Review: Approve
Look great now, thanks!
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-server/7.0_improve_tree_view_doc-afe/+merge/183382
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch
lp:~openerp-community/openobject-server/7.0_improve_tree_view_doc-afe.
On 09/03/2013 02:25 PM, Niels Huylebroeck wrote:
Worth mentioning if the search will also match ['foo', 'bar'] when given foo
i suppose?
Yes, as you can easily test for yourself ;-) Just be mindful of the series
filter when you do so. We're in the process of adding a default All series
On 08/15/2013 09:32 AM, Eric Caudal wrote:
The v6apps.openerp.com has disappeared: I can understand the need to switch to
the new repository but one side effect is that all current link in the web are
not redirected to the new repository... That is a huge loss in terms of
knowledge base and
On 08/13/2013 11:00 AM, Bidoul, Stéphane wrote:
A quick question. It seems apps.openerp.com http://apps.openerp.com
ignores the installable flag in module descriptors.
The community uses this flag to mark modules that are on a series branch but
not in a usable state (yet) because, for
On 08/13/2013 11:35 AM, Joël Grand-Guillaume wrote:
b) I want to know how to manage the community branches repositories... I can
register them only using my Camptocamp account/login which is obviously not the
purpose at all ! Can we have a login for the OCA in order to manage the
community work
Hello everyone,
We are glad to announce that the new OpenERP Apps platform has finally been
launched today on http://apps.openerp.com
It now fully replaces the former v6apps version, and you can proceed to
register your v7.0 modules immediately. Most previously registered repositories
and
On 05/03/2013 10:07 PM, Ray Carnes wrote:
We are considering releasing a security update for OpenERP to prevent
exploiting the vulnerability even on unpatched PostgreSQL versions.
Has a decision been made about this yet? Will OpenERP be releasing a
security update? Or is the recommended
On 04/04/2013 04:53 PM, Marco Dieckhoff wrote:
Am 04.04.2013 16:40, schrieb Brendan Clune:
Something which affects us all...
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1456/
Sadly, it looks like neither Ubuntu 12.04 (Server, LTS) nor Debian Wheezy/Sid
has a version newer than the ones mentioned
On 02/22/2013 03:26 AM, Syllas F. de O. Neto wrote:
I’m trying to read the modules description clicking on its names in Application
section but I’m getting this error message:
ProgrammingError: column loempia_module.license does not exist
LINE 1:
Review: Abstain
Hello,
Thanks for your contribution, however I'm afraid the bug was fixed in the mean
time, and we ended up keeping checkboxes because radio buttons are impractical
when you change your mind and you suddenly don't want to check either option.
--
The proposal to merge
lp:~openerp-community/openerp-web/trunk-bug-1104118-chintan into lp:openerp-web
has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Rejected
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openerp-web/trunk-bug-1104118-chintan/+merge/149979
--
/05_developing_modules.html#community-addons
and
http://doc.openerp.com/v6.1/contribute/02_working_in_teams.html#community-contributor-teams
--
Olivier Dony
OpenERP Belgium
On 02/07/2013 10:46 AM, Bertrand Hanot wrote:
I think Raphaël made a good resume of the AGPL principle even if it's
Review: Needs Information
@Stefan: thanks a lot for the reviews!
@Tien Tran: your merge proposal looks very good to me now, thanks to Stefan's
excellent review. My only remaining questions are:
- Your module depends on both base_iban and base_vat. Do you actually
require these modules for
Review: Approve
Thanks for the quick update!
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-addons/fix-1100271-membership-invoice-form-view/+merge/143504
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch
Review: Approve
Nice, seems to work well indeed. The python parser perhaps expects a
well-formed Python source file, so it might randomly recognize some terms and
not others, though I haven't investigated.
Thanks for the fix!
--
On 01/11/2013 03:04 AM, indra kurniawan wrote:
Hi, several people cannot register to
http://forum.openerp.com/forum/ucp.php?mode=register (http error 500)
I just fixed it, could you please try again? Something had apparently gone
wrong during a phpBB update at some point.
On 12/21/2012 12:03 PM, Anders Wallenquist wrote:
Question from the Swedish translation team:
Will all translations done for server/addons and version 6.1 be copied
to 7.0? We have thousands of hours of transkateing booth old bad
translations and new with focus at 2012. The state of trunk (and
Review: Disapprove process
Hi LudoRA,
Sorry for answering so late. Thanks for contributing translations!
Unfortunately we cannot accept merge proposals for translations because it
bypasses the translation process.
As you're now a member of the French translation team you can apply the
The proposal to merge
lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-mail-trans-fr into
lp:openobject-addons has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Rejected
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-mail-trans-fr/+merge/135455
--
On 12/13/2012 01:57 PM, Alan Lord wrote:
On 12/12/12 17:34, Olivier Dony wrote:
= Invoices =
I've just tested and the sequence and descriptions seem to propagate
well between SO and Customer Invoice. On a side note the handle to
reorder invoice lines is still missing, that will be fixed soon
On 12/12/2012 09:31 AM, Alan Lord wrote:
On 08/10/12 17:46, Olivier Dony wrote:
The plan is:
- line ordering enabled by default without needing an extra module
- line ordering propagates throughout the workflow by default
- multi-line/complex description allowed for each line by default
On 12/11/2012 03:09 PM, Lionel Sausin wrote:
Le 11/12/2012 11:25, Joël Grand-Guillaume a écrit :
I started creating the 7.0 series on some of the community projects as we
start migrate some modules. I did it without branching the 6.1 serie and I
associated a brand new branch on them. The goal
Review: Needs Information
Hi Joshua,
Thanks for contributing to the OpenERP documentation/translation!
Would you mind if we renamed the zh_CN subdirectory to just zh in order to
be consistent with the naming of the other translations? (can be done when
merging your proposal)
Bonus question:
On 11/28/2012 01:40 PM, Tóth Csaba wrote:
i would like to mention at this point of the discussion, a lot of string
in the source code are not marked as translatable text.
For example if you open the addons/web/controllers/main.py at line 900
there is a string You cannot leave any password
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your contributions to the french translation, and thanks
Alexandre for the spellchecking.
The process for improving translation is described in our documentation[1] and
works via Launchpad's translation system, not with merge proposals/patches.
This allows a proper review
The proposal to merge
lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-membership-trans-fr into
lp:openobject-addons has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Rejected
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-membership-trans-fr/+merge/135600
Dear OpenERP Contributors and Translators,
A beta version of OpenERP 7.0 was published last week, and the features and
the terms to translate can now be considered frozen.
It is therefore a good time to start working on the translations for OpenERP
7.0/trunk, in order to be able to complete them
On 11/16/2012 04:41 PM, Joël Grand-Guillaume wrote:
Dear Community,
We recently talked about joining our efforts to develop new OpenERP modules.
For that purpose, we decided to create on Launchpad new projects sorted by
topic with new teams to manage them.
Excellent work, thanks a lot to all
On 11/16/2012 07:32 PM, Ovnicraft wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Olivier Dony o...@openerp.com wrote:
On 11/16/2012 06:57 PM, Joël Grand-Guillaume wrote:
@ovnicraft: I think we cannot do this without OpenERP agreement as they
publish that on doc.openerp.com = @odony, did you confirm
On 11/06/2012 03:49 PM, Alan Bell wrote:
So my questions now are as follows: have I understood this right?
Yes, that's pretty much the idea. The proxy running on the local system could
be anything, but having OpenERP installed with a POS module that supports the
hardware would be a
On 10/22/2012 04:23 PM, Michael Njoku wrote:
I have been developing modules on openerp 6.1. I tried to install these
modules
on openerp 7.0 but i keep getting errors. Please can someone outline the
changes that have been made to the module structure in 7.0 and how to upgrade
your modules.
On 10/16/2012 10:05 AM, Marvin Hass wrote:
ValueError: No such external ID currently defined in the system: base.ad
2012-10-16 06:58:00,734 5905 ERROR max_61 openerp.netsvc: No such
external ID currently defined in the system: base.ad
If you want to generate this error - follow this steps:
On 10/15/2012 11:08 AM, Marco Dieckhoff wrote:
In this context, can you elaborate on the future of the XMLRPC interface, also
but not exclusively regarding backwards compatibility and thus stability
towards external programs?
There is no plan and no reason to drop XML-RPC support, it is a key
On 10/15/2012 04:20 PM, Nhomar Hernández wrote:
5. don't understand your question; tabs are the same in web and GTK ?
Tabs, i mean, click and open in a new tab (browser tab) without reload entire
client or click and open an internal tab (as GTK does) i think both are
needed.
Various
On 10/11/2012 11:07 AM, Stefan Rijnhart wrote:
On 10/11/2012 10:50 AM, satyamitra maan wrote:
yeah me to tried following the same, honestly we are not able to bring out
any good module following the same.
if there is no such document , may be some of existing custom modules on
top of
On 05/30/2012 01:19 PM, Sven Petersen wrote:
does anyone know if the Import into an existing OpenERP instance EDI Feature
for Invoices should work within a Multi Company Environment?
No it will not work at the moment, the system will consider that the document
already exists and ignore it, as
On 05/24/2012 03:56 PM, ange désiré bouabré wrote:
Excuse me everyone, I develop a module in openerp and I'm stuck in my work.I
know I'm not allowed to send emails that way but I have no choice.I really
need
your help to continue. It's been a week since I did not advance. I just can
not
Review: Resubmit
Please resubmit the merge proposal against the 6.1 branch, you've done it
against trunk, hence the numerous conflicts.
Thanks!
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openerp-web/6.1-bugfix-share_errors/+merge/105319
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch
The proposal to merge lp:~openerp-community/openerp-web/6.1-bugfix-share_errors
into lp:openerp-web has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Rejected
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openerp-web/6.1-bugfix-share_errors/+merge/105319
--
On 05/03/2012 11:21 PM, SIESA - Miguel Gutiérrez wrote:
Hello,
Hi Miguel,
I have a big problem when I restore my DB on my production server it dont
work but in my computer does, both openerp are the same, here the bug I have
Server Traceback (most recent call last):
SNIP
File
On 04/25/2012 08:22 AM, Hery Atmadja wrote:
It's an old topic, but as promised we just added a reference entry. Hope this
helps.
Excellent, this is invaluable! It's always hard for partners to find the time
to publish references, especially wrt hardware sizing (as you can see, there is
not
Review: Approve
The bug analysis is right and the patch is perfect, thanks a lot for another
excellent contribution!
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-addons/ibeardslee_addons_967829/+merge/100089
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch
Review: Disapprove
Hi,
The diff appear empty, probably because the trunk code has been fixed a while
ago (your branch seems based on rev 3635, this was fixed at rev 3639)
See also my comment on the bug report.
Thanks,
--
The proposal to merge
lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/fix_duplicate_bank_ids into
lp:openobject-addons has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Rejected
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-addons/fix_duplicate_bank_ids/+merge/92737
--
On 01/20/2012 03:26 PM, Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe
informatique Numérigraphe wrote:
When v6.0 was released, the core team marked lots of bugs invalid
or won't fix because they didn't intend to address them in v6.0, so
that they don't get in the way before the release. I understand
On 01/30/2012 11:38 AM, Viktor Nagy wrote:
is it possible to set the context from a database query in an
ir.actions.act_window definition?
my example code is here http://pastebin.com/kciDSURZ
Not really, no. Quoting your example:
field name=context eval={'search_default_draft':
On 01/10/2012 03:45 AM, Jonathan Vargas wrote:
First have all of you a nice new year, I am new at the list.
Welcome aboard!
I plan to start using and testing 6.1. I started with openerp 6.0.3's
debian packages, and since then some questions arose with new 6.1 version:
1. Is it safe now to
On 01/09/2012 10:40 AM, Hery Atmadja wrote:
Moving forward, we, at Infinity, would be glad to provide OpenERP with
the number using our references - however due to confidentiality nature,
the client name shall have to be concealed. I do hope other partners can
contribute as well.
Excellent!
Let's take this rather technical discussion about sizing and configuring
an OpenERP production environment to the community list...
See my random comments below in the text..
On 01/05/2012 08:38 PM, Rostam Azarbehi wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Just my two cents, if that is ok. I agree with the
On 12/12/2011 01:08 PM, cont...@thinkingtree.co wrote:
I was told that OE 6.0.3 version needs Python 2.6 / 2.7.
That's not correct, the OpenERP 6.0 series only requires Python 2.5.
Python 2.6 will only be required as of the 6.1 series. So perhaps you
have nothing to worry about...
On 12/13/2011 08:58 PM, Fabien (Open ERP) wrote:
Olivier,
Are you sure it's a good idea to allow context in workflows ?
Workflows are not used for user interface interactions, but for
controlling the
evolution of the object. It has no sense to put context on constraints
and, for
the
FWIW, you can have a look at the branch where I tested merging the same
thing[1].
As I explain on my merge prop there, I think we need more work on the addons
side in order to get any benefit from this work, and that will be much more
tricky. I started a wip of changing addons in this
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
