Hi I have finish the storage refactor, so please give me your feedback !
Also I have move this MP on github so let's comment here =
https://github.com/OCA/server-tools/pull/1
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~akretion-team/server-env-tools/server-env-tools/+merge/91
Your team Server Environment
Sébastien BEAU - http://www.akretion.com has proposed merging
lp:~sebastien.beau/hr-timesheet/hr-timesheet-fix-project-id-not-required into
lp:hr-timesheet.
Requested reviews:
HR Core Editors (hr-core-editors)
Related bugs:
Bug #1333639 in HR - Timesheet Management: Fail to create/modifiy a
The proposal to merge
lp:~sebastien.beau/hr-timesheet/hr-timesheet-fix-project-id-not-required into
lp:hr-timesheet has been updated.
Description changed to:
Fix, by default project id is not required and can be empty
For more details, see:
Sorry Alex, I just realise that the fix was already here with the last commit.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~sebastien.beau/hr-timesheet/hr-timesheet-fix-project-id-not-required/+merge/224268
Your team OpenERP Community Reviewer/Maintainer is subscribed to branch
lp:hr-timesheet.
--
Mailing
Review: Needs Fixing
Hi
You don't have to test if available_option.mandatory is True but you can only
use if available_option.mandatory as it's a boolean the is True is useless.
--
Review: Approve code review, no test
LGTM
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~akretion-team/carriers-deliveries/7-split-default-option-state-from-deliv-method-dbl/+merge/224027
Your team Stock and Logistic Core Editors is subscribed to branch
lp:carriers-deliveries.
--
Mailing list:
Review: Approve test, review
As it's a small abstract feature, I think it make sense to create a helper
module for all similary one. The aim is just to have one module which is a
toolbox with all abstract feature (not user feature) that can be use everythere.
Description is clear now so I
Review: Approve
LGTM, I agree too. It's only an abstract module that provider a standard API
for real implementation
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~akretion-team/carriers-deliveries/7-base-delivery-carrier-dbl/+merge/221226
Your team Stock and Logistic Core Editors is subscribed to branch
Hi
I am asking myself about adding an object storage.configuration and a field
storing_configuration_id on the model ir.model.fields. The idea will to use
a default storing configuration for every field (on file sytem for exemple) but
after we will be able to customise on every field from the
Hi Georges,
Sorry I fix the description.
In my case I want to store every binary/image field on the file system and not
in postgresql. And this not only for attachement but for every image/binary
field (image field on product, on category) I want this because I want to
serve my image
The proposal to merge lp:~akretion-team/server-env-tools/server-env-tools into
lp:server-env-tools has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Work in progress
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~akretion-team/server-env-tools/server-env-tools/+merge/91
--
Sébastien BEAU - http://www.akretion.com has proposed merging
lp:~akretion-team/server-env-tools/server-env-tools into lp:server-env-tools.
Requested reviews:
Server Environment And Tools Core Editors (server-env-tools-core-editors)
For more details, see:
The proposal to merge lp:~akretion-team/server-env-tools/server-env-tools into
lp:server-env-tools has been updated.
Description changed to:
Here is a proposal too add new fields for image and binary. There is a example
module so you can try it. But before merging I propose to remove it.
For
Sébastien BEAU - http://www.akretion.com has proposed merging
lp:~akretion-team/server-env-tools/server-env-tools into lp:server-env-tools.
Requested reviews:
Server Environment And Tools Core Editors (server-env-tools-core-editors)
For more details, see:
Sébastien BEAU - http://www.akretion.com has proposed merging
lp:~akretion-team/openerp-product-attributes/openerp-product-attributes-product-image
into lp:openerp-product-attributes.
Requested reviews:
Product Core Editors (product-core-editors)
For more details, see:
The proposal to merge
lp:~akretion-team/account-financial-tools/account-financial-tools-account-writeoff-autodelete
into lp:account-financial-tools has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Work in progress
For more details, see:
Sébastien BEAU - http://www.akretion.com has proposed merging
lp:~akretion-team/account-financial-tools/account-financial-tools-account-writeoff-autodelete
into lp:account-financial-tools.
Requested reviews:
Account Core Editors (account-core-editors)
For more details, see:
Review: Approve code review, no test
Thanks for this module.
Having an additionnal delivery cost is a pain, your module make it optional
it's ok for me.
LGTM
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~agilebg/carriers-deliveries/adding_delivery_optional_invoice_line_7/+merge/213867
Your team Stock and
Sébastien BEAU - http://www.akretion.com has proposed merging
lp:~akretion-team/project-service/project-service-base-sale-project into
lp:project-service.
Requested reviews:
Project Core Editors (project-core-editors)
For more details, see:
Hi Raph,
Can you just update the __openerp__.py file with the OpenERP V7 still (removing
xml_demo, xml_update... with data...)
Otherwise it's good for me
Thanks
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~akretion-team/sale-wkfl/7.0-add-sale_group/+merge/201017
Your team Sale Core Editors is requested to
Review: Approve code review, no test
Good improvement. Thanks
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openerp-product-attributes/7.0-product_custom_attributes-allow-to-bind-on-existing-field/+merge/190146
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch
Review: Approve (code review, no test)
LGTM
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/openerp-product-attributes/7.0-attribute-set-create-1256023/+merge/197092
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch
lp:openerp-product-attributes.
___
Sébastien BEAU - http://www.akretion.com has proposed merging
lp:~sebastien.beau/openerp-fiscal-rules/openerp-fiscal-rules-fix-multicompany
into lp:openerp-fiscal-rules.
Requested reviews:
Account Core Editors (account-core-editors)
For more details, see:
Hi, I am working on the split of sale_exception in two module sale_exception
and exception_rule. The aim is to have the exception on different object like
purchase_order, stock_picking, invoice ... (already implemented on
purchase_order and soon on picking).
If we put the module sale_exception
After my split I have around 140 ligne of python in exception_rule and around
40 in sale_exception so I really think it's worth to split it because we will
avoid to duplicate the 140 ligne in every module for nothing, it's not a lot
but it's always better to no duplicate the code (on
Sorry I made a mistake around 180 line in the generic module
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community-reviewer/sale-wkfl/move_sale_exception_module_from_e-commerce-addons-jge/+merge/193567
Your team OpenERP Community Reviewer is subscribed to branch
Hi Guewen,
As talk before it's better to link the account_move_line instead of the
account_move (indeed a move can have X line and each line can be linked to a
specific sale order).
I made the change and also I add the possibility to specify a description.
For the migration script I don't
Hi sorry for my late answer.
@Marc, I didn't know about this existing module
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mcassuto/openobject-addons/product_dimensions-standardized-translations/files/head:/product_dimensions
(I lost some hour...)
@Maxime regarding the product_size, I agree with Humberto I
Review: Approve
Thanks for the update Alexis
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~akretion-team/server-env-tools/70-scheduler-error-mailer/+merge/188240
Your team Server Environment And Tools Core Editors is subscribed to branch
lp:server-env-tools.
--
Mailing list:
Sébastien BEAU - http://www.akretion.com has proposed merging
lp:~sebastien.beau/openerp-product-attributes/openerp-product-attributes-product-dimension
into lp:openerp-product-attributes.
Requested reviews:
Product Core Editors (product-core-editors)
For more details, see:
Thanks Guewen for your remark. It's fix now.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~akretion-team/openerp-product-attributes/mixin-extraction/+merge/151333
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch
lp:openerp-product-attributes.
___
Mailing list:
Hi all
I merge the improvement done by Benoit
https://code.launchpad.net/~akretion-team/openerp-product-attributes/openerp-product-attributes-fix-view/+merge/168461
https://code.launchpad.net/~akretion-team/openerp-product-attributes/openerp-product-attributes-fix-view/+merge/168461
I extract
Alexandre yes your right, I did a mistake on number version.
I don't use anymore this version number now. Only two digit is the correct way.
See you
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/openerp-product-attributes/7.0-product_images-migr/+merge/145630
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed
33 matches
Mail list logo
