Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/stefan-therp_lp794584 into lp:openobject-addons

2011-08-18 Thread Olivier Dony (OpenERP)
Review: Approve Excellent work, Stefan, looks good for merging. Nice touch with the RFC reference in the docstrings. I didn't know the :rfc: RST role yet :-) Thanks a lot for another great contribution! --

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/stefan-therp_lp794584 into lp:openobject-addons

2011-07-07 Thread Olivier Dony (OpenERP)
Review: Needs Fixing technical Hello Stefan, Wow, very impressive work, thanks!! Here are a few comments (line numbers are within current diff): - we're trying to unify out docstring formats (at least for new ones, as indeed the old ones are still a mess), and trying to use RST docstrings, so

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/stefan-therp_lp794584 into lp:openobject-addons

2011-06-22 Thread Stefan Rijnhart (Therp)
Review: Resubmit On 06/20/2011 10:21 AM, Stefan Rijnhart (Therp) wrote: I will therefore reuse this branch to suggest such a breakdown in separate functions, and leave the added functionality for a separate module of our own make. Sounds great, thanks! :-) Hi Olivier, this branch now

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/stefan-therp_lp794584 into lp:openobject-addons

2011-06-20 Thread Stefan Rijnhart (Therp)
On 17-06-11 15:51, Olivier Dony (OpenERP) wrote: Review: Needs Information Hello Stefan, I agree with the idea of the bug report wishlist, I wonder, isn't this use case sufficiently specific that it could be done in a separate module (e.g. 'ldap_import')? Using the template user system

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/stefan-therp_lp794584 into lp:openobject-addons

2011-06-17 Thread Olivier Dony (OpenERP)
Review: Needs Information Hello Stefan, I agree with the idea of the bug report wishlist, I wonder, isn't this use case sufficiently specific that it could be done in a separate module (e.g. 'ldap_import')? Using the template user system alone is perhaps sufficient for the normal case? Now,