Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/7.0-community-review into lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/v7.0

2013-09-26 Thread Guewen Baconnier @ Camptocamp
Review: Approve Thanks for having took care of that. Seems good to me. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-doc/7.0-community-review/+merge/186295 Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/7.0-community-review.

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/7.0-community-review into lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/v7.0

2013-09-23 Thread Stefan Rijnhart (Therp)
Review: Approve Thanks for the changes! -- https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-doc/7.0-community-review/+merge/186295 Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/7.0-community-review.

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/7.0-community-review into lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/v7.0

2013-09-19 Thread Stefan Rijnhart (Therp)
Thanks for picking up the changes! I am afraid I forgot to mention another one: in line 40, you mention that the license should be set to 'AGPL'. Maybe change this to 'AGPL-3' to reflect that this is the exact entry in the module model's selection field. Modules with a license literally set to

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/7.0-community-review into lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/v7.0

2013-09-18 Thread Guewen Baconnier @ Camptocamp
Review: Needs Fixing Some comments if you have ideas how to improve them: -- I find this sentence a bit obscure: Avoid resubmitting a MP if not explicitly intended. The MP will lose history of commit and that make more work for reviewers. I would prefer but still I'm not sure: Avoid to use

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/7.0-community-review into lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/v7.0

2013-09-18 Thread Guewen Baconnier @ Camptocamp
On 09/18/2013 04:04 PM, Stefan Rijnhart (Therp) wrote: @Guewen: I still think the 3 working days is not very meaningful in a world wide community, so I would prefer to go the other way and drop this terminology in favour of 5 calendar days. Good point. Anyway we should drop one or the other,