I wonder if a monkey patch would work - they are all python constraints
basic logic, copy the constraints lists to some other list of lists,
reassign obj constraints in module to []
assign back when needed
general idea
addon_constraints = [openerp.addons.account_constraints.obj1._constraints,
+1
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Ovnicraft ovnicr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Daniel Reis dgr...@sapo.pt wrote:
Would it be a good idea to rename the master branch to 8.0 on the
GitHub projects?
This would match the best practice on Launchpad, where you
Hello,
Thanks that is an option but difficult to implement in travis. I also want
to test account_constraint if possible.
Maybe your right, split the addons in a seprate branch or repo is the easy
solution.
It is also a problem we will encounter in other project under some
circonstancies, so
Hi, Stefan,
I have changed Wiki to assign me 12 of the 49 conflicts (for now) for
resolving manually bit by bit. Do you have any guide you want me to follow?
What I have tought is:
- Inspect the changes of the revision and see if the patch is already
inside (because Odoo has made it, but
On 03-07-14 10:02, Pedro Manuel Baeza Romero wrote:
Hi, Stefan,
I have changed Wiki to assign me 12 of the 49 conflicts (for now) for
resolving manually bit by bit. Do you have any guide you want me to
follow? What I have tought is:
* Inspect the changes of the revision and see if the
I need advice to setup travis for account financial tools.
The addon account_constraints adds a lot of constraints and make other
addons tests fails.
Nicolas,
You could try splitting up tests into different build jobs:
Pedro
Those 2 should be OK and integrated in official, already checked them on
first run of replay in February.
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ocb/ocb-addons/7.0/revision/8696: [FIX]
report_webkit - change description for new webkit lib path parameter
(yannick.vauc...@camptocamp.com)
Thanks, Yannick, I'll write down this then on the wiki.
Regards.
2014-07-03 10:47 GMT+02:00 Yannick Vaucher yannick.vauc...@camptocamp.com:
Pedro
Those 2 should be OK and integrated in official, already checked them on
first run of replay in February.
On 07/03/2014 09:08 AM, Guewen Baconnier wrote:
* Module A add a 'required' on a field of model product.product (or a
new required field)
* Module B does not depends on module A (because there is no reason to),
creates a product for its own test, will fail because the required field
added by
Hi Nicolas,
I'm curious to see which tests fails due to account_constraint. Do you have
a pointer?
Could the incompatibilities be resolved by adapting the failing tests to
satisfy the constraints?
-sbi
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Nicolas Bessi nicolas.be...@camptocamp.com
wrote:
Hello,
Hi Stéphan
The tests mainly fail on the period_id constraint, so we can fix the tests,
but it is a workaround.
For the rest they are broken tests to be fixed one by one.
There still is the cases of the credit control modules that uses scenarios
as tests depends on a complex vertical settings.
I
Hello,
+1
for what Leornardo said.
There are huge Github projects such as Rails that use these merge buttons
just fine and are some of the most successful projects around...
We should free maintainers from work, who already give their time for free,
even if that means putting more burden of the
As someone who just recently (like less than a week ago) joined the
mailing list, I have to say the footers / signatures with all the
company pic, logo, disclaimer, etc are one of the most annoying things
ever. I've read two threads and already can't stand them anymore.
2014-06-24 4:23 GMT+02:00
On 03 Jul 2014, at 14:49, Leonardo LeartS Donelli leart...@gmail.com wrote:
As someone who just recently (like less than a week ago) joined the
mailing list, I have to say the footers / signatures with all the
company pic, logo, disclaimer, etc are one of the most annoying things
ever. I've
Hello,
I did the tranfer of ownership. The correct repository is now
https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-quality-tools
Please update your remotes and configuration files :)
Alexandre
On 02/07/2014 16:24, Joël Grand-Guillaume wrote:
+1 for including this under the OCA umbrelly in the community
+1 avoid signatures with images and large slogans
El 03/07/2014 09:53, Davide Corio davide.co...@lsweb.it escribió:
On 03 Jul 2014, at 14:49, Leonardo LeartS Donelli leart...@gmail.com
wrote:
As someone who just recently (like less than a week ago) joined the
mailing list, I have to say the
Hello César,
What do you need?
El jul 2, 2014 6:28 PM, cesar alejandro rodriguez megaal...@gmail.com
escribió:
Dear Community,
Someone knows of a module for check control. This module needs to control
the numeration and register in Odoo.
Thank you in advance.
Regards.
César Rodriguez
Sorry Martin but I disagree with you, the top-posting is the most practical
way, makes more easy follow large threads, but it just my opinion.
El 03/07/2014 10:19, Davide Corio davide.co...@lsweb.it escribió:
On 03 Jul 2014, at 15:10, Martin Collins mar...@mkcollins.org wrote:
And top-posting
On 03 Jul 2014, at 15:10, Martin Collins mar...@mkcollins.org wrote:
And top-posting :-)
+1
Sadly, for many people, the logos and disclaimers are added by corporate
dictat at the MTA so cannot be avoided.
It’s always possible to create a gmail account or so :)
--
Davide Corio
On 2014-07-03 07:03, Mariano Ruiz wrote:
+1 avoid signatures with images and large slogans
And top-posting :-)
Sadly, for many people, the logos and disclaimers are added by corporate
dictat at the MTA so cannot be avoided.
Those replying should remove them though.
Martin
On 03 Jul 2014, at 15:26, Mariano Ruiz mrs...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry Martin but I disagree with you, the top-posting is the most practical
way, makes more easy follow large threads, but it just my opinion.
When you read an article or a book, you start from the top of the page.
In an email
Hi Leonardo,
Yes I read that about using submodule in OCA repositories. It could
helps but it involves some extra work to update the state of main
repositories regularly I suppose (to map latest versions of
sub-repositories). It could be automated by a script, maybe in the future.
My
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Raphael Valyi rva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
+1
for what Leornardo said.
There are huge Github projects such as Rails that use these merge buttons
just fine and are some of the most successful projects around...
We should free maintainers from work, who
Thanks Pedro,
Indeed, the strategy with the symlink is a good solution if we don't
want all others modules listed in Odoo.
As we use Mercurial subrepos, the .hgsub mapping might look like this:
server = [git]git://github.com/odoo/odoo.git
addons_oca_PROJECT_X = [git]
On rebase vs pull requests, this is a good read:
http://blogs.atlassian.com/2013/10/git-team-workflows-merge-or-rebase/
Notice the difference between rebase as local cleanup and rebase as team
policy.
2014-07-03 16:13 GMT+02:00 Ovnicraft ovnicr...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:36 AM,
2014-07-03 9:43 GMT-04:30 Ovnicraft ovnicr...@gmail.com:
Yes please, rebase is the best AFAIK to keep clean PRs, here we are
working too with edX and that project has a good wiki about rebase
https://github.com/edx/edx-platform/wiki/How-to-Rebase-a-Pull-Request
Really thanks Cristian, it
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Nhomar Hernández nho...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-03 9:43 GMT-04:30 Ovnicraft ovnicr...@gmail.com:
Yes please, rebase is the best AFAIK to keep clean PRs, here we are
working too with edX and that project has a good wiki about rebase
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Nhomar Hernández nho...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-03 9:43 GMT-04:30 Ovnicraft ovnicr...@gmail.com:
Yes please, rebase is the best AFAIK to keep clean PRs, here we are
working too with edX and that project has a good wiki about rebase
[offtopic]:
don't forget this excellent reference learning material for git:
http://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/
Out of curiosity, in case you're wondering how these generators work,
they're based on Markov chains
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markov_chain):
- based on the original
Hi,
I work on odoo for a customer and it's impossible to found a way to create
access right by group,
do you know how to do this ?
Thx !
Have a nice day !
Lauréote Loïc
___
Mailing list:
I work on odoo for a customer and it's impossible to found a way to
create access right by group,
do you know how to do this ?
You're not very clear in the question, but if you mean customer
specific user groups:
- Create a new Group (Settings - Users - Groups) , for example IT
Department.
-
On 03 Jul 2014, at 22:14, Ian Beardslee i...@catalyst.net.nz wrote:
But, each to their own. Just don't be like one of the other ERP type
systems that will ban people from their lists for top posting.
i don’t think the way we reply to emails is a real issue here.
we just need to be sure the
+1
As you read each email in the thread you just need to read the top as
you work your way through the emails. Easier than scrolling through
what you've already read in the previous emails that people have been
replying to.
But, each to their own. Just don't be like one of the other ERP type
++11
Still hope for a technically more advanced, thread centered solution. maybe
within the oca-odoo?
BTW, please note: Here is my new cool signature ;-)
[image: El Alemán S.A.S] http://www.elaleman.co/
David Arnold BA HSG / Gerente
315 304 13 68/ david²elaleman.co
El Alemán S.A.S Office:
I am not sure if override is a good idea.
I made a separate 'Journal Items Search All' entry since the 'fast' encoding of
account move lines is a bit easier with the standard Journal Items list view
(the journal and period are in that case taken from the values in the 'Period'
and 'Journal'
If you want to review this MP, better bzr branch locally this branch and use a
meld-like tools to see the differencies, because the diff tools of launchpad is
not very good for that.
Regards.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~sylvain-legal/server-env-tools/7.0-flake8/+merge/225456
Your team
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-reporting
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~jean-lelievre/stock-logistic-report/stock_extra/+merge/182063
Your team Stock and Logistic
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-reporting
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~jean-lelievre/stock-logistic-report/stock_batch_move/+merge/182060
Your team Stock and
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-reporting
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~jean-lelievre/stock-logistic-report/logistics_list_report/+merge/182038
Your team Stock and
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-workflow
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~agilebg/stock-logistic-flows/adding_product_customer_code_picking/+merge/202472
Your team
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-workflow
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/stock-logistic-flows/7.0-picking_dispatch_picking_oriented_use-rde/+merge/215147
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-workflow
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-workflow
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~agilebg/stock-logistic-flows/adding_picking_line_description_7/+merge/219800
Your team Stock
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-workflow
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-warehouse
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~numerigraphe-team/stock-logistic-warehouse/7.0-inventory-location/+merge/223880
Your team
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-warehouse
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~numerigraphe-team/stock-logistic-warehouse/7.0-inventory-hierarchical/+merge/223882
Your
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-warehouse
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~numerigraphe-team/stock-logistic-warehouse/7.0-add-stock-available/+merge/220758
Your team
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-warehouse
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~numerigraphe-team/stock-logistic-warehouse/7.0-fix-decimal-precision/+merge/223881
Your
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-warehouse
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/stock-logistic-warehouse/7.0-improve_stock_location_ownership-afe/+merge/210859
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-warehouse
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~numerigraphe-team/stock-logistic-warehouse/7.0-add-stock-available-mrp/+merge/220764
Your
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-warehouse
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~numerigraphe-team/stock-logistic-warehouse/7.0-add-stock-available-sale/+merge/220761
Your
Hi Alexandre,
sure, I'll migrate it to github asap.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~agilebg/stock-logistic-flows/adding_picking_line_description_7/+merge/219800
Your team Stock and Logistic Core Editors is subscribed to branch
lp:stock-logistic-flows.
--
Mailing list:
Review: Resubmit
The source code management for this project has been moved to
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-warehouse
Could you resubmit this MP on the new site?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/stock-logistic-warehouse/7.0-port-base_product_merge/+merge/162121
Your team
Alexandre, I'll do it asap.
Cheers.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~agilebg/stock-logistic-flows/adding_product_customer_code_picking/+merge/202472
Your team Stock and Logistic Core Editors is subscribed to branch
lp:stock-logistic-flows.
--
Mailing list:
Alexandre,
here you can find the related PR on github:
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-workflow/pull/1
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~agilebg/stock-logistic-flows/adding_picking_line_description_7/+merge/219800
Your team Stock and Logistic Core Editors is subscribed to branch
Alexandre,
you can find the related PR on github here:
https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-workflow/pull/2
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~agilebg/stock-logistic-flows/adding_product_customer_code_picking/+merge/202472
Your team Stock and Logistic Core Editors is subscribed to branch
Well... product_serial will have to be largely re-written for v8, given all the
big changes in stock management. If the modules in v7.0 stay on LP, we could
keep this branch here.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~akretion-team/stock-logistic-flows/70-product_serial-plus-plus/+merge/195144
Your
Alexis, They don't! :)
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Alexis de Lattre ale...@via.ecp.fr
wrote:
Well... product_serial will have to be largely re-written for v8, given all
the big changes in stock management. If the modules in v7.0 stay on LP, we
could keep this branch here.
--
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~savoirfairelinux-openerp/knowledge-addons/document_multiple_records/+merge/206960
Your team OpenERP Community Reviewer/Maintainer is requested to review the
proposed merge of
lp:~savoirfairelinux-openerp/knowledge-addons/document_multiple_records
The proposal to merge
lp:~savoirfairelinux-openerp/knowledge-addons/document_multiple_records into
lp:knowledge-addons/7.0 has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Approved
For more details, see:
60 matches
Mail list logo
