Dear Community,
First, I want to thank you Michel for trying to respect the community
process and tools. I know it's a bit of work, but it's mandatory to
maintain quality. I hope you had all your answer (making a fork and go
through Merge Proposal when requesting an update, so the review can
Thanks for this very interesting approach.
Would it be feasible to base the logic on Stock Moves instead of Pickings?
That would take into account the case a single move is forced available.
Also, it would be interesting to consider a change in the source location as a
forced assignation, but
I vote then for 2 spaces
more readeable for new use case (kanban, futures cases)
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/margin-analysis/7.0-port-product_historical_margin-xml-retab-yvr/+merge/190350
Your team Margin Analysis Core Editors is subscribed to branch
lp:margin-analysis.
--
I could be useful to give users an indication that other assigned moves will be
put to exceptions and need to be re-scheduled.
Maybe a warning pop-up would help?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/stock-logistic-flows/7.0-add-stock_recompute_availability_on_force-afe/+merge/187772
Your
Yannick Vaucher @ Camptocamp has proposed merging
lp:~camptocamp/openerp-reporting-engines/7.0-add-base_report_assembler-yvr into
lp:openerp-reporting-engines.
Requested reviews:
OpenERP Community Reviewer (openerp-community-reviewer)
For more details, see:
Review: Needs Information
Hi, Yannick, I have tried to use your module, but I'm unable to test it,
because I don't find the way to do it. Can you explain to me how to activate
it? It would be desirable also to have these instructions on the module
description.
I have found also a terminology
This module doesn't install configuration for report it is only the base.
You can use account_invoice_assemble to test it:
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/account-invoice-report/7.0-add-invoice_report_assemble-yvr
--
Assemblage has other meanings than only art purpose:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/assemblage
Assemblage seems more accurate than assembly to me.
Assembly is more used for a group of person or a governement entity.
--
Stéphane Bidoul (Acsone) has proposed merging
lp:~acsone-openerp/account-financial-tools/account_credit_control_portal_portal_lp1248906
into lp:account-financial-tools.
Commit message:
[FIX] fix bug in account_credit_control preventing portal user to view their
invoices
Requested reviews:
Review: Approve code review, no test
LGTM. It's an ugly hack, but for now I don't see better solution. It's up to
OpenERP to fix the way account.invoice is queried to avoid giving permissions
to all the linked models.
Regards.
--
Pedro Manuel Baeza has proposed merging
lp:~pedro.baeza/ocb-addons/6.1-bug-1061494 into lp:ocb-addons/6.1.
Requested reviews:
OpenERP Community Backports Team (ocb)
Related bugs:
Bug #1061494 in OpenERP Community Backports (Addons): Purchase order fiscal
position
Review: Approve no test, code review
LGTM
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/stock-logistic-flows/add-stock_split_picking-jge/+merge/193605
Your team Stock and Logistic Core Editors is subscribed to branch
lp:stock-logistic-flows/7.0.
--
Mailing list:
2 spaces for reasons given above. thanks
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/margin-analysis/7.0-port-product_historical_margin-xml-retab-yvr/+merge/190350
Your team Margin Analysis Core Editors is subscribed to branch
lp:margin-analysis.
--
Mailing list:
Hi Vamsi,
Yes, official branch is missing new import format, that will be fixed when this
branch gets finally merged...
As for Hospital Ward error, seems like it is an error on official branch, as we
are not modifying hospital ward.
We are currently focused on patient/physician/appointment
Hi, Mario
Could you report a bug, explain it?
Regards
Federico Manuel Echeverri Choux
Vauxoo - OpenERP's Gold Partner
mobile: (+521) 444-1-400683
Tel: (+52) 444-8185539
skype: echeverrifm
web: http://www.vauxoo.com
twitter: @echeverrifm
@vauxoo
2013/11/6 Vamsi Krishna Atluri
Lorenzo Battistini - Agile BG has proposed merging
lp:~agilebg/ocb-addons/7.0-bug-1198250-elbati into lp:ocb-addons.
Requested reviews:
OpenERP Community Backports Team (ocb)
Related bugs:
Bug #1198250 in OpenERP Italia: l10n_it_partially_deductible_vat errore con
iva totalmente
On 11/04/2013 09:49 AM, Stefan Rijnhart (Therp) wrote:
@Maxime: while this would be OK on regular community projects, on OCB
projects modifying the change at merge time could cause a conflict because
the proposal on upstream does not contain such modifications. In order to
prevent the
I also vote for 2 spaces.
Also please: if there is more then one attribute, have each attribute on a new
line.
(Unfortunately OpenERP will break if you spread attributes over multiple lines,
even where this would be perfectly logical, as with long domain expressions).
Having each attribute on
please fold lines at approx 80 cols
There are some ' ' missing after end of sentence '.' (e.g line 213-214)
line 399: don't use a dictionary as default argument to a method. Use None and
test for None-ness inside if needed
line 405: I suggest using a StringIO object rather that using
You're very right, but I don't know if the team's name can be changed.
Please, any of the OCA - Administrative
Staffhttps://launchpad.net/~oca-administrative-staffteam, check if
it can be changed and, if nobody has something against this,
change the name as proposed.
Regards.
2013/11/7 Daniel
20 matches
Mail list logo
