Hi all,
I found these changes to pcap-regulator.c on my local kernel tree.
I don't remember exactly where these voltages came from, but this
version is definitely safer: Better to undervoltage it than
overvoltage.
Not a big deal for V1, V3 and VVIB, but current SW1 table looks
dangerous (off by 0.05-1.85v. 0.1v on the setting being used by
ezx/current kernel).
--
Fix pcap-regulator.c voltage tables.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ribeiro <drw...@gmail.com>
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pcap-regulator.c
b/drivers/regulator/pcap-regulator.c
index 137b455..02862be 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/pcap-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/pcap-regulator.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/mfd/ezx-pcap.h>
static const u16 V1_table[] = {
- 2775, 1275, 1600, 1725, 1825, 1925, 2075, 2275,
+ 2775, 1275, 1600, 1725, 1875, 1950, 2075, 2275,
};
static const u16 V2_table[] = {
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static const u16 V2_table[] = {
};
static const u16 V3_table[] = {
- 1075, 1275, 1550, 1725, 1876, 1950, 2075, 2275,
+ 1075, 1275, 1550, 1725, 1875, 1950, 2075, 2275,
};
static const u16 V4_table[] = {
@@ -80,12 +80,12 @@ static const u16 VSIM2_table[] = {
};
static const u16 VVIB_table[] = {
- 1300, 1800, 2000, 3000,
+ 1300, 1500, 1800, 2000,
};
static const u16 SW1_table[] = {
- 900, 950, 1000, 1050, 1100, 1150, 1200, 1250,
- 1300, 1350, 1400, 1450, 1500, 1600, 1875, 2250,
+ 900, 950, 1000, 1100, 1150, 1200, 1250, 1300,
+ 1350, 1400, 1450, 1500, 1600, 1875, 2250, 4100,
};
#define SW2_table SW1_table
--
Daniel Ribeiro
