RFKILL=m && m || RFKILL=n
(which actually looks equally strange). Is that correct?
Anyhow, perhaps this should be added to the "Kconfig hints" in
Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt.
Paul Bolle
t;depends on RFKILL" the
> latter.
But doesn't
depends on RFKILL || !RFKILL
always evaluate to true when running "make *config"? (Even if RFKILL is
an unknown symbol when that expression is parsed!)
I'd say that dependencies such as this one might as well be dropped from
their Kconfig file.
Paul Bolle
