Em Qui, 2009-05-07 às 16:37 +0100, Mark Brown escreveu:
> No, it will return success. You can see the stub implementation in the
> API header files.
I looked at it, and kept pxamci_regulator_get() on v3 because of
this. :)
> > If both are supplied and config_regulator is set, then the regulator
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 11:40:46AM -0300, Daniel Ribeiro wrote:
> Em Qui, 2009-05-07 ??s 09:27 +0100, Mark Brown escreveu:
> > regulator_get() and regulator_put() compile out if regulator is not
> > defined, though you will get a dummy regulator back.
> Will regulator_get() return an error case c
Em Qui, 2009-05-07 às 09:27 +0100, Mark Brown escreveu:
> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:13:53AM -0300, Daniel Ribeiro wrote:
>
> > +#else
> > +static int pxamci_regulator_get(struct pxamci_host *host)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +static void pxamci_regulator_put(struct pxamci_host *host) {}
>
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:13:53AM -0300, Daniel Ribeiro wrote:
> +#else
> +static int pxamci_regulator_get(struct pxamci_host *host)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static void pxamci_regulator_put(struct pxamci_host *host) {}
regulator_get() and regulator_put() compile out if regulator is not
de
Em Qui, 2009-05-07 às 14:12 +0800, Eric Miao escreveu:
> From the coding style point of view, we might better keep the number
> of those "#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR .. #endif" to a minimum, e.g.
Thanks! Check this new version. Now releasing the regulator on exit too.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ribeiro
-
