On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:11:00PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
>> +static void pxamci_set_power(struct pxamci_host *host, unsigned int vdd)
>> {
> ...
>> + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
>>
> ...
>> + if (host->pdata->s
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:11:00PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> +static void pxamci_set_power(struct pxamci_host *host, unsigned int vdd)
> {
...
> + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
>
...
> + if (host->pdata->setpower) {
> + host->pdata->setpower(host->dev, vdd);
> +
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Daniel Ribeiro wrote:
>> Em Qui, 2009-05-14 às 17:11 +0800, Eric Miao escreveu:
>>> I'd rather it's implemented something like below (it's only for illustration
>>> purpose):
>>
>> I dont think we can set ocr_av
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Daniel Ribeiro wrote:
> Em Qui, 2009-05-14 às 17:11 +0800, Eric Miao escreveu:
>> I'd rather it's implemented something like below (it's only for illustration
>> purpose):
>
> I dont think we can set ocr_avail on set_ios(). See mmc_power_up().
>
Yes, so that's for
Em Qui, 2009-05-14 às 17:11 +0800, Eric Miao escreveu:
> I'd rather it's implemented something like below (it's only for illustration
> purpose):
I dont think we can set ocr_avail on set_ios(). See mmc_power_up().
--
Daniel Ribeiro
I'd rather it's implemented something like below (it's only for illustration
purpose):
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/pxamci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/pxamci.c
index 793ab2a..6fa7a05 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/pxamci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/pxamci.c
@@ -73,42 +73,28 @@ struct pxamci_host {
};
#if
Em Qua, 2009-05-13 às 21:51 +0200, Pierre Ossman escreveu:
> What happened to the version with the warning?
Sorry for the delay, here it is.
Changes pxamci.c to use the regulator subsystem. Uses the regulator case
CONFIG_REGULATOR is defined and a matching is regulator is provided, or
falls back
