-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Rayner wrote:
> Note you will still need to use the ezx ldisc rather than the one I
> have posted to OM since I've stripped out the Moto extensions.
I will try to fix the oops that Antonio reported is happening on your
driver, and replace our versi
Hi Antonio
> > > If we (read _not_me_ :)) manage to make it work well, we can think
> > > to use its non-muxed mode for gsmd for the time being, so to start
> > > doing b. (see previous messages). This will prevent us to have gps
> > > on a780, so it is not ideal. When gsmd will support muxed devi
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:04:50 +0100
"Jim Rayner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Still oops on x86 with MOTOROLA_EZX defined.
>
> Hmm, I'm not surprised since I haven't tested with the define enabled.
> Can you send me some details or a log, I'll have a go at identifying
> the problem or at least
Hi Antonio
> Did you document also the behaviour on the wiki, didn't you?
> http://wiki.openezx.org/Mux_cli
Yes, quite a while ago
> Is Harald aware of your work?
I did send Harald the code some time ago but he was & still appears to
be very much over worked
> OpenEZX will be more and more
> o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Antonio Ospite wrote:
> If we (read _not_me_ :)) manage to make it work well, we can think to
> use its non-muxed mode for gsmd for the time being, so to start doing b.
> (see previous messages). This will prevent us to have gps on a780, so
> it is not
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 14:51:26 +0100
"Jim Rayner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Antonio
>
> This code will need some rework for openezx, my original goal was to
> make it usable for any
> form of muxed AT device using any tty driver
>
Did you document also the behaviour on the wiki, didn't you?
h
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 19:58:42 +0100
"Jim Rayner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Daniel, did you try mux_cli on x86?
> > > Are you able to fix the rmmod oops?
> > Havent tried it yet... I hope i can take a look this weekend, but i
> > cant guarantee, I have some family appointments for the weekend.
> > Daniel, did you try mux_cli on x86?
> > Are you able to fix the rmmod oops?
> Havent tried it yet... I hope i can take a look this weekend, but i
> cant guarantee, I have some family appointments for the weekend.
I have a version of mux_cli that works on x86
It works as a line discipline so y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Ribeiro schreef:
> 2007/10/4, Koen Kooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Daniel's suggestion of a named pipe that gsmd talks to and ezxd forwards to
>> /dev/mux*
>> would be the easiest thing to start with. Has anyone figured out how to
>> reset the mo
2007/10/4, Koen Kooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Daniel's suggestion of a named pipe that gsmd talks to and ezxd forwards to
> /dev/mux*
> would be the easiest thing to start with. Has anyone figured out how to reset
> the modem,
> since atz doesn't seem to be present?
Yes, i think that an unix socket
2007/10/4, Antonio Ospite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok, let's turn pragmatic, since there are some overlaps between a.
> and b. anyway, what about starting with a. and convert to b. when
> feasible? I think Harald is too busy at the moment to comment about our
> ezx integration, and we do not know gsm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Antonio Ospite schreef:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:45:33 +0200
> Antonio Ospite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> AFAIR presently there are mainly two ways we see a possible
>> integration:
>>
>> a. have ezxd talk with mux devices and act like a proxy bet
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:45:33 +0200
Antonio Ospite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIR presently there are mainly two ways we see a possible
> integration:
>
> a. have ezxd talk with mux devices and act like a proxy between gsmd
>and the modem. This way we handle all the non-GSM stuff in ezxd.
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:45:03 -0300
Daniel Ribeiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > Did you apply this patch? (Its commented out in the series file)
> Guess not, i will try again this weekend. Thanks. :)
>
Yes this patch is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Did you apply this patch? (Its commented out in the series file)
Guess not, i will try again this weekend. Thanks. :)
- --
Daniel Ribeiro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG/YPvw3OYl0G0liQR
Hello.
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 11:22, Daniel Ribeiro wrote:
>
> Antonio Ospite wrote:
> > Ah, and we should get brave and think about some work on mux_cli itself,
> > too.
> > Having a much stable mux_cli driver on x86 can speedup gsmd _and_ gpsd
> > integration a lot :)
>
> I tried before, but ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Antonio Ospite wrote:
> Ah, and we should get brave and think about some work on mux_cli itself,
> too.
> Having a much stable mux_cli driver on x86 can speedup gsmd _and_ gpsd
> integration a lot :)
I tried before, but never managed to get mux_cli co
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:15:33 -0300
"Daniel Ribeiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/9/27, Antonio Ospite [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > I would like to summarize our ideas and needs about gsmd
[...]
>
> > So, please reply to this mail to comment, complete or correct what I
> > wrote, so we can extra
2007/9/27, Antonio Ospite [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I would like to summarize our ideas and needs about gsmd integration, so
> we can request for comments to gsmd developers.
>
> Excluding the GSM part, we need to interact with BP for such further
> functionalities (please tell if I forgot anything):
>
Hi,
I would like to summarize our ideas and needs about gsmd integration, so
we can request for comments to gsmd developers.
Excluding the GSM part, we need to interact with BP for such further
functionalities (please tell if I forgot anything):
* acquire BDADDR
* enable/disable Bluetooth
*
20 matches
Mail list logo
