Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OF1.0 to OF1.3 no flow insertion

2018-02-15 Thread Anil Vishnoi
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:27 AM, Jacob Steadman wrote: > Hi, > > > > I had code that inserts flow rules in the switches once the feature is > installed at the controller. It was and still is working fine for OF1.0 but > I had to upgrade to OF1.3 to make use of multible flow tables. > > > > If I r

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OF1.0 to OF1.3 no flow insertion

2018-02-15 Thread Jamo Luhrsen
> statement is displayed (attached). > >   > >   > > *From:*Shuva Kar [mailto:shuva.jyoti.kar...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* 15 February 2018 03:16 > *To:* Jacob Steadman ; > openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org > *Cc:* Jamo Luhrsen > *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-d

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OF1.0 to OF1.3 no flow insertion

2018-02-14 Thread Shuva Kar
Overall the structure looks fine to me except that I could not find definition of some variables, which I am sure you would have taken care. Apart from looking at the logs what JamO mentioned, it would be great if you could attach a Wireshark onto the 6653 port and see if the flow is sent over t

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OF1.0 to OF1.3 no flow insertion

2018-02-14 Thread Jamo Luhrsen
Jacob, I wont really be able to help debug this at the java level, but what do you see on the switch side and in karaf.log? Wondering if the flow is being sent down to the switch, which is rejecting it for some reason? Or possibly, the internal work hits some condition which would throw an Excepti

[openflowplugin-dev] OF1.0 to OF1.3 no flow insertion

2018-02-14 Thread Jacob Steadman
Hi, I had code that inserts flow rules in the switches once the feature is installed at the controller. It was and still is working fine for OF1.0 but I had to upgrade to OF1.3 to make use of multible flow tables. If I replace the match so that the flow matches everything, the rule is inserted