09, at 14.13, Manickam, Vasanth wrote:
>>>
>>>> But the problem is that the entire path is searched rather than
>>>> just the
>>>> extension.
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Trond.Norbye at Sun.COM [mailto:
ssage-
>>> From: Trond.Norbye at Sun.COM [mailto:Trond.Norbye at Sun.COM]
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 1:12 PM
>>> To: Manickam, Vasanth; Bruce Furber
>>> Cc: OpenGrok Discuss
>>> Subject: Re: [opengrok] Help with improvements
&g
bye at Sun.COM [mailto:Trond.Norbye at Sun.COM]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 1:12 PM
>> To: Manickam, Vasanth; Bruce Furber
>> Cc: OpenGrok Discuss
>> Subject: Re: [opengrok] Help with improvements
>>
>> You can currently do that... Just type in the exten
t; Cc: OpenGrok Discuss
> Subject: Re: [opengrok] Help with improvements
>
> You can currently do that... Just type in the extension in the path
> field (without the "dot"). The content of the path field is tokenized,
> and it will search for the different tokens if I rememb
s at opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [opengrok] Help with improvements
>
> Searching on file extension would be nice. Not just the path
> /c/myprog.asm
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Garen"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 1:30 PM
> Subjec
07 PM
> To: opengrok-discuss at opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [opengrok] Help with improvements
>
> Searching on file extension would be nice. Not just the path
> /c/myprog.asm
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Garen"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2
: [opengrok] Help with improvements
Searching on file extension would be nice. Not just the path
/c/myprog.asm
- Original Message -
From: "Garen"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [opengrok] Help with improvements
It's not as big a deal with C, b
Searching on file extension would be nice. Not just the path /c/myprog.asm
- Original Message -
From: "Garen"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [opengrok] Help with improvements
It's not as big a deal with C, but with C++ for example
It's not as big a deal with C, but with C++ for example there's myriad
extensions to search for.
Headers with .h could be C or C++, .C is confusingly C++; C++ headers could be
.H, .hpp, .h++, etc.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Put c in the path field, and you would search in files with a c suffix
(or named c.something
Cheers
Trond
On 6. sep.. 2009, at 00.54, Garen wrote:
>> I would guess that you want a specialized analyzer as
>> well?
>>
>
> Yes, that's right. More than that, I'd like to search by language,
Trond Norbye writes:
>>> - Some minor tweaks/fixes, for example I've noticed that in 0.7 the
>>> date shown next to a file in the webapp is the time it was indexed,
>>> not the time it was last modified. Not sure if this is still the case
>>> in HEAD.
>>>
>>
> There is a RFE for this. The prob
> I would guess that you want a specialized analyzer as
> well?
>
Yes, that's right. More than that, I'd like to search by language, e.g.:
Search: my search terms lang:C
Even if there isn't a specialized analyzer for every language, recognizing them
isn't that hard to do.
--
This message post
I would guess that you want a specialized analyzer as well?
Cheers
Trond
On 4. sep.. 2009, at 16.59, Garen wrote:
> With any luck, the latest version might have fixed the issues you
> were interested in:
>
> http://ctags.sourceforge.net/news.html
> ...
> * Fixed detection of triple strings i
With any luck, the latest version might have fixed the issues you were
interested in:
http://ctags.sourceforge.net/news.html
...
* Fixed detection of triple strings inside other strings [Python, Bug #1988130].
* Fixed an endless loop with comments in triple strings [Python, Bug #1988027].
* Fixed
> Hi,
>
...
>
> - Analyzer for Python source files. Syntax
> highlighting of Python
> files already looks quite good but the identifier
> recognition doesn't
> seem to work properly, at least not in 0.7 (haven't
> checked HEAD yet
> but from looking at the source it doesn't look like
> anything c
Hi,
I'm thinking about making a few improvements to Opengrok. I won't have
a lot of time to work on it but here are a few things I'd like to add:
- Analyzer for Python source files. Syntax highlighting of Python
files already looks quite good but the identifier recognition doesn't
seem to work pr
First of all, thanks for your ideas. Please create RFE's so that the
ideas don't get lost!
More inline
>> - Integrating Jetty into the distribution so that playing with the web
>> application becomes easier (Jetty is licensed under APL so there
>> doesn't seem to be a problem.)
>>
I don't k
Julian Scheid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking about making a few improvements to Opengrok. I won't have
> a lot of time to work on it but here are a few things I'd like to add:
>
> - Analyzer for Python source files. Syntax highlighting of Python
> files already looks quite good but the identifier re
Trond Norbye wrote:
> In the future the xml file will go away (from the users point of view),
> and you have to either use:
> a) the CLI
> b) the GUI
> c) a web config page.
>
> All of these methods will use JMX to talk to the opengrok server to get
> / set the configuration. The _only_ configu
19 matches
Mail list logo
