Paul wrote:
> Heya Tim,
>
> --- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Tim Churches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, it seems to me that openEHR as it stands is an interesting and
>> potentially useful technical advance which permits greater semantic
>> precision and thus may ease the valid interchan
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Will Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> See below.
>
> - - - - - - - -
>
> Can the OCC be accessed by non-OpenMRS sites? And, as a corollary,
> can non-OpenMRS sites contribute to the concept coop?
>
> Thanks!
>
> - - - - - - - -
Hi Will,
We
Heya Tim,
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Tim Churches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it seems to me that openEHR as it stands is an interesting and
> potentially useful technical advance which permits greater semantic
> precision and thus may ease the valid interchange of health data, but
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> Paul,
>
> This is a good explanation of what OpenMRS is about,
> and I find it quite refreshing. The problem of
> constraints to allow greater acceptance and "accuracy"
> (OpenEHR) against allowing change as you seem to do to
> allow freedom to improve and grow in new d
Thomas Beale wrote:
> Tim Churches wrote:
>> Thomas Beale wrote:
>>
>> No, what I am trying to point out is that it is *not* the same in
>> openEHR, because openEHR archetype definitions are not currently
>> licensed under licenses which conform with open source licensing principles.
>>
> Tim
Paul,
See below.
- - - - - - - -
On Feb 20, 2007, at 5:32 AM, Paul wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> --- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Beale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
>>> The power of this approach is hard to appreciate
>>>
until you're in a
situati
I agree with Tim. The licensing is ambiguous in regard
to open licenses (OSI) and copyleft principles of
FOSS.
However OpenEHR may want to keep this "open" for
change.
The archetypes at least, must be protected from being
commercialised as they are the collaborative work of
many people.
Nandala
Paul,
This is a good explanation of what OpenMRS is about,
and I find it quite refreshing. The problem of
constraints to allow greater acceptance and "accuracy"
(OpenEHR) against allowing change as you seem to do to
allow freedom to improve and grow in new directions,
but which can cause confusio
Thank you Thomas. This is not urinalysis but urea and
electrolytes!
What is the "Any Result" "data type is not set" doing
here. It is, after all, urea and electrolytes, and the
electrolytes are mentioned. Is this to leave room for
rare electrolytes like the level of copper in the
blood or iron?
Tim Churches wrote:
> Thomas Beale wrote:
>
>>
>
> No, what I am trying to point out is that it is *not* the same in
> openEHR, because openEHR archetype definitions are not currently
> licensed under licenses which conform with open source licensing principles.
>
Tim, you have a technical mi
Ime,
If you haven't already this is a good group for content related work:
HIF-net: working together to improve access to reliable information for
healthcare providers in developing and transitional countries. Send list
messages to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To join or leave the list, send an
email
Hi Thomas,
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Beale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> > The power of this approach is hard to appreciate
> >
> >> until you're in a
> >> situation where lots of people have lots of things
> >> they want to
> >> characterize in a
Thomas Beale wrote:
> Tim Churches wrote:
>> Thomas Beale wrote:
>>
>>>
>> Yes. openEHR archetype definitions are analogous to the SQL back-end
>> database schema and triggers, and to some degree to the middleware
>> business logic, in traditional applications.
> actually, they are not; that is
Tim Churches wrote:
> Thomas Beale wrote:
>
>>
>>
> Yes. openEHR archetype definitions are analogous to the SQL back-end
> database schema and triggers, and to some degree to the middleware
> business logic, in traditional applications.
actually, they are not; that is the openEHR reference model
All,
I assume people on this list have seen this:
http://blogs.sun.com/Sun_on_Health/entry/open_source_and_open_standards
Could Sun be a sponsor for OSHCA 2007?
Klaus
_
From: openhealth@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dr Molly Cheah
Sent: Monday, 19 February
15 matches
Mail list logo
