Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
I don't see how it clarifies your reference to the original
license. VistA is in the public domain in the sense that it may be
obtained though FOIA. That's not the same as being licensed under an
open source license. Indeed, speaking as a non-lawyer, I don't
On Mar 6, 2007, at 4:51 AM, JohnLeo Zimmer, MD wrote:
Thus, Medsphere's GPL license can be applied only to the
differences
between OpenVista server and FOIA VistA. (Likewise, any modifications
World Vista makes to VistA.)
Unfortunately, I don't think that's really feasible. It's rather
The software in question was not VistA at all. It was developed internally
at Medsphere. We are simply talking about a company that placed an open
source offering on sourceforge and then, dramatically, had the software
removed.
They have since released one of the items they yanked under an open
JohnLeo Zimmer, MD wrote:
.
Thus, Medsphere's GPL license can be applied only to the differences
between OpenVista server and FOIA VistA. (Likewise, any modifications
World Vista makes to VistA.)
IMHO, of course,
jlz
I don't believe so. Public domain software CAN be re-released under
Tim Cook wrote:
JohnLeo Zimmer, MD wrote:
.
Thus, Medsphere's GPL license can be applied only to the differences
between OpenVista server and FOIA VistA. (Likewise, any modifications
World Vista makes to VistA.)
IMHO, of course,
jlz
I don't believe so. Public domain software CAN be
Fred Trotter wrote:
The software in question was not VistA at all. It was developed internally
at Medsphere. We are simply talking about a company that placed an open
source offering on sourceforge and then, dramatically, had the software
removed.
They have since released one of the items
