There is also the Public Library of Science (http://plos.org).
-- Bhaskar
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 04:55 -0600, Adrian Midgley wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 23:32 -0800, Koray Atalag wrote:
Don't you (ALL) think we badly need an Open Source and
Free Journal in our domain. I strongly feel
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 10:33 +0100, Christian Heller wrote:
However, I think it is time to accept a citation of Wikipedia,
for example. Many profs claim that it were not scientific enough.
Wikipedia is not peer-reviewed in any formal process. All professors
should claim it is not scientific
Tim Cook wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 10:33 +0100, Christian Heller wrote:
However, I think it is time to accept a citation of Wikipedia,
for example. Many profs claim that it were not scientific enough.
Wikipedia is not peer-reviewed in any formal process. All professors
should claim
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 06:09 +1100, Tim.Churches wrote:
What is wrong with BioMed Central medical Informatics and Decision
Making?
Absolutely nothing. I haven't visited it in awhile and had forgotten
about it. Thanks for the reminder.
Cheers,
--
Tim Cook
[Non-text portions of this
Hi All,
Thanks for all your valuable input...I was really not
aware of the presence of such journals! Well, the
blame is partly on my side but this also points out to
the fact that their popularity is questionable?
I am going to share this knowledge with as many people
as possible on my
Hello,
as promised some weeks ago, I have written an article trying
to describe some of the ideas behind CYBOP. It is called
Reflexions on Knowledge Modelling and can be found at:
http://cybop.berlios.de/papers/index.html
It may not be of best quality, and was rejected by all evaluators
for the
