Nandalal Gunaratne MS FRCS
Urological Surgeon
Will,
Considering how much you have you
have
personally improved
our community with working code, I feel a
little
silly lecturing you.
For that matter almost everyone on this list
is
quite clearly the
choir
this
year for its
activities and had been told that we will get
another RM1million before
the end of the year to disburse to our NGO members
for their projects.
This is for tobacco control.
Rgds,
Molly
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
I support this as well, but what does this support
mean
Hooray!
Cheers to OSCAR team!
Nandalal
David Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *** It's official! *** OSCAR has been
certified by
OntarioMD under the Physician IT Program. The list of
certified products will be published at
www.ontariomdtsp.ca. From OntarioMD: Certification
means that
, they could pulll off
something workable without the huge financial input made by the British.
Nandalal
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
Koray Atalag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
namely CEN TC251, is centered around openEHR metholodologies and
artifacts...Also as far as I
know
Accept impermanance as the universal truth in our
daily living, and that helping others is what really
helps you.
Nandalal
--- Tim Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If any of you read The Edge ( http://www.edge.org/ )
you'll be familiar
with John Brockman's annual big question to a chosen
group
Since we started off with dangerous questions,
aren't everyone taking things too seriously? The more
dangerous the suggestions, the better?
;-)
Nandalal
--- Peter Holt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Tim,
I believe you're being trolled.
-- Peter.
Always do right. This
Hi William,
In which countries are they active?
Nandalal
--- William Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RE: ...when will more not-for-profit medical
organizations band together...
Not such a dangerous idea. A group of international
nonprofit health agencies has recently formed a
--- William Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where can I get more info? The website
www.engenderhealth.org does not give any clues. NPOKI
gives nothing much on a google search.
Nandalal
Collectively we work in over 160 countries. I won't
list them all, but
here's a short list of the countries
is also useful for this purpose. However one really
good site with descriptions, reviews and
classifications would be nice. You are aware of the
excellent state of the art, OSCAR project in Canada,
based on JAVA which plans to cover almost everything
in health care, eventually? (with apologies to
Dr Molly Cheah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Molly,
I have made some changes/suggestions to your excellent draft. But is the
mission statement too long? I think about 5-7 points would suffice.
Nandalal
Hi everyone,
I've tried to put together views expresed so far, but runs into
Thomas Beale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:yes...well, systemic solutions to
interoperability require systemic
changes to the architecture, not ad hoc additions on the outside. You
have to be consciously designing for interoperability (along with the
other 28 incredibly complex things you
Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One problem in people not learning from VistA is that it is so difficult to
install and run! The other point is that the various modules have different
licences. It is not fully open sourced in that sense (or am I wrong?).
Some of the largest
Phillipe,
I would like to know your approach to things, more clearly. The list I made is
more in fun than an initiative for OSHCA!! My interest infact is in the use of
IT for the area of Research, audit and CME for clinicians. The BIG jobof making
those for administrators, managers,
Bhaskar, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The trouble comes from using the word FREE (FOSS) in an increasingly
commercial world of software.
Maybe commercial users of FOSS should drop the word Free and call it OSST
(open source software technologies).
Free as in beer belonged to the last
Bhaskar, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! A bit complicated but understandable. But Wine is needed to get the
CPRS GUI going? IT is a pity that there is no GUI for unix systems
WHile your liveCD based on DSL is commendable, it is one of the most diffcult
liveCDs to configure and
to
know the difference? :-)
Nandalal
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 09:14 -0600, Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
Bhaskar, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The trouble comes from using the word FREE (FOSS) in an increasingly
commercial world of software.
Maybe commercial users
Rick Stockton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com,
Nandalal Gunaratne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can someone advise me, why does OpenEMR tend to have so many
checkboxes in its forms? (I am without a clue, just a sentence or two
is sufficient.)
Free form
Koray Atalag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pls. do not take my prior post as advertising of a company; and I assure you
that I have no financial interest with this company...
If it was it was poor advertising! The link gave a 404 error :-(
Thanks for a dumb gui for dumb and dumber
Will Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim has done a good job of analysing this report. I do not think anyone whould
have the freedom to create their own versions of what FOSS means and the
licences mean as well!
There is however a subtle difference between open source software and Free
ivhalpc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, so I haven't been reading
openhealth digests lately :-) I've
been BUSY ;-) -- IV
Fishing?
Nandalal
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Ignacio Valdes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
iHealth and Technology brings you a Forrester Whitepaper:
Will Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too agree. Certification is a matter of standards and quality. ther should
be no compromise. The FOSS once equally certified maybe able to make stroner
claims. However because of the collaborative/community type of development,
there could be a waver of
Business Readiness Rating - Home
Could HIS be included here as well?
NandA
Thomas Beale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Tim.Churches wrote:
Will Ross wrote:
Fred,
I oppose the creation of a separate open source certification
process. I think it compromises the opportunity for
Richard Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Wow after all that feedback
I'm honestly trying to pick where to
start on this one. I'm seeing some confusion here between legal aspects
and the socio-political.
Perhaps this is because socio-political is far more important in asia
Richard Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The next GKP annual meeting is here in Sri Lanka. Anyone coming? :-)
NandA
Molly, I think you should incorporate in Malaysia eventually. As a
Malaysian you'll have a very easy time doing it and know what it means.
The members of the
Tim Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a great admierer of the US and it's people, the films, the sports, the
comics on which I was introduced to reading :-)
I still think it is one of the best countires and even the President is not
all bad flamebait
Most of the FOSS software come
they?
The digital divide is maintained. This is why any laws that may affect FOSS
worries us as it is the only way forward. Even those in the US and EU do not
think software patent issues are silly.
NandA
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
Definitely no anti-US sentiments from here
Constitution of the Open Source Health Care Alliance
Hi Molly,
A few questions/suggestions.
9.3 - Names for the above offices in Article 9.1 shall be proposed and
seconded and election will be by a simple majority vote of the members at the
annual
It seems to me that Fred is going to review just these, and others are supposed
to chiop in with some reviews or part of reviews of any other EMRs worth
talking about.
Open VistA remains to be reviewed and OSCAR.
Zope based SPIRIT? and OIO are two others that come to mind. While the ones
It is indeed most encouraging to see such developments. When I clicked the
screenshots i was taken to the Microsoft web site!!!
Your link should be
http://www.mirrormed.org/fb/
Not
http://http//www.mirrormed.org/fb/
Regards
nandalal
Ignacio Valdes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
Tim.Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are quite right, TIm. This is a funny thing with Firefox. I am using 1.0.7
maybe they ahve sorted things in 1.5.1, hopefully!
Nandalal
Tim.Churches wrote:
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
It is indeed most encouraging to see such developments
Tim.Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim,
All the following work with Firefox - in that i am taken to the correct URL!
What were you trying to point out here?
Nandalal
That leads to a whole genre of single word, non-deterministic URLS in
Firefox. Try these (in Firefox, results
alvinbmarcelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks like a very good system. Congratulations!
I will try this and introduce it to my colleagues in community health. Maybe
some of them are already aware of it.
Nandalal
Hello all. This is Alvin Marcelo (formerly of NLM)
.
www.oemr.org
-- Rod
www.sunsetsystems.com
On Monday 17 April 2006 08:58 am, Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
Andrew Schamess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew,
There are several open source products but I doubt if any one of them can
do all that you ask.
LAMP based ones include
David Forslund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
If the OSHCA takes on the task of making the glue
* to get FOSS for Health groups to understand the true value of FOSS which is sharing/contributing and collaborating with ideas and code
*to demonstrate the value of interoperability and
Joseph Dal Molin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Will,
Please forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing ;-)
They have not done this before!
Perfection is worth striving for, but it is almost never reachable, Therefore it was agreed by most of us that it was OK to get it
Fred Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fred,
There was enough time given for dissent/discussion. Molly asked everyone repeatedly to comment on the issues. We can't wait for ever, therefore a time limit was set, and the FINAL draft was set down. Therfore there was really nothing to
LSB 3.1 also incorporates the recently approved ISO standard LSB Core (ISO/IEC 23360) into the standard. The Free Standards Group also has said that Red Hat, Novell, Ubuntu, Asianux and others are all certifying their versions of their operating systems to the LSB, delivering true world-wide
, which is
seconded and passed.
does this disrupt the process or is it a legitimate part of the
process? you decide.
[wr]
- - - - - - - -
On Apr 25, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
Fred Trotter wrote:
Fred,
There was enough time given for dissent/discussion. Molly asked
Will Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dear sir,
unfortunately, i believe the record will show that i am qualified to
share the disputation sandbox from this side of the pond. we can't
have california not represented; after all, look who we elected
governor.
Yes! And he will be back!
Could you please explain the difference between the Templates (there are quite a few of these, but very basic) and the eforms? If one needs to add patient data regarding the procedures they undergo, what is the best approach?
I believe that all the data is stored in the MYSQL database, and
...
Thanks
Nandalal Gunaratne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all,
I'm collating standards (open or otherwise) that are being used in open
source health applications.
I'd appreciate if the developers on the list would explicitly publish what
standards they base their applications on and perhaps we
Hi David,
Does OSCAR allow patients to keep their own records or access them? Are you hoping to implement something on the lines of PING?
I have installed OSCAR and am trying it out. I installed it on Ubuntu, and I am also documenting things as I go along. As a surgeon I must find a way
Nice thoughts!
If you are having Zope on your server i hope you tried Open Infrastructure for Outcomes, which is the best software for research and audit for clinicians you can get!
Torch is another quite complete and usable system running on Zope.
I have setup OSCAR on Ubuntu Breezy
Jel Coward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
Have you got the latest build with the greater granularity of permissions?
OSCAR 2.1.0 is what I am experimenting with.
--
Jel Coward
SPONSORED LINKS
Software distribution Salon software Medical software
Jel Coward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
Have you got the latest build with the greater granularity of permissions?
OSCAR 2.1.0 is what I am experimenting with.
--
Jel Coward
SPONSORED LINKS
Software distribution Salon software Medical software
Alvin B. Marcelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are quite right. Interoperability depends in turn on the agreement on standards. Coding systems included.
Unfortunately the best nomenclature coding system is SNOMED-CT which is a proprietary product. But I am sure the new versions of the ICD
Bhaskar, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me take an even stronger position. If you really want to secure
your network of PCs, you should run the OS off a Linux live CD-ROM which
cannot be infected. It is so straightforward to create customized Linux
live CDs, that I see no reason to not
David Forslund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The coding system standards in the US have been specified by CHI. We
should share coding systems, but
even more important is to provide mappings between coding systems, since
not everyone will ever use the
same coding system. OSS could lead by
Bhaskar, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has it's benefits, but not a great practical solution, nor safe
enough, as one may want to assume.
[KSB] Like perfection, absolute security does not exist in this
universe. All we can do is make intelligent trade-offs!
Yes! This truth makes
James Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the way it is and multiple licences are necessary depending on the number of users. Maybe things have changed recently?
Nanda Gunaratne
On May 11, 2006, at 8:23 AM, David Forslund wrote:
In the US (and UK) SNOMED-CT is freely
--- Nandalal Gunaratne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alvin B. Marcelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are quite right. Interoperability depends in turn on the agreement on standards. Coding
systems included.
Unfortunately the best nomenclature coding system is SNOMED-CT which
?
alvin
--- Nandalal Gunaratne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alvin B. Marcelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are quite right. Interoperability depends in turn on the
agreement on standards. Coding
systems included.
Unfortunately the best nomenclature coding system
as
to what one means by free. (as in beer vs ideas).
Dave
alvin
--- Nandalal Gunaratne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alvin B. Marcelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are quite right. Interoperability depends in turn on the
agreement on standards. Coding
systems
Jason Tan Boon Teck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well anything making the work of an evil mind more difficult is worth it :-)
Total security being a myth.
Nanda
On 5/12/06, Franklin M. Siler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 11, 2006, at 10:22 PM, Jason Tan Boon Teck wrote:
Is NetEpi based on EpiInfo or something growing out of that?? I used EpiInfo it some years ago and can remember writing to the CDC to create a linux version :-)
Regards
Nanda Gunaratne
Tim.Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ignacio Valdes wrote:
Linux Apache MySQL PHP server setups are
ICD-10 has tried to be more accurate in making the diagnosis, thereby going into great detail, with the obvious effects of bloat.
The ICD-10 -PCS is taking quite the opposite way of doing things, but could be difficult to get people to use it for this reason. They will not have their
Thank you for the detailed explanation. I will tell some people who are into epideomological aspects of healthcare to look at Netepi.
Regards
Nanda Gunaratne
Tim Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
Is NetEpi based on EpiInfo or something growing out of that?? I
This is another interesting paragraph
A statement from IBM said the company will engage with industry leaders. But it did not mention whether it will coordinate efforts with the so-called Interoperability Consortiuma group of large IT vendors including IBM, Cisco Systems Inc., Microsoft
I think your argument to convince business is pretty good, if they are accepting it.
In the same way we mayed a way to convince them that the use of interoperability also saves them a lot of money in the long term and gives them bargaining power when purchasing software from different
I second what Tim says. Do not think of the politics/politicians of the country concerned, but of the ordinary people of that country, who form the WASTE majority!
Your expertise is of value to them.
Tim.Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Forslund wrote:
I apologize for bringing this
I agree with Tim. VistA has a lot going for it, but there are some good fully
FOSS projects that can be developed further. They are build on modern languages
and well established FOSS - like LAMP. The end users are more IT literate now
than at the time VistA started, and would like to be able
Thanks Joseph, for the clarification. It is good to know that the value of the
open source model is becoming more accepted and that in the future, GUI based
versions of VistA too, will be open source.
What type of open source licence is likely to be used for these
implementations? Public
Thank you for clearing many things. However, the way
VistA is developing and branching out, will create
many problems in the future. I hope World Vista takes
suitable precautions to ensure that future users of
the FOSS version of World VistA, will not get into
difficulties as you have pointed out
You said:
As always, critiques, comments and questions are
welcome.
Are you serious?
If you are, let me request that a document on how to
use this, once installed, with a real example, with
screenshots where necessary be put up. Without this it
is useless. The LiveCD you kindly sent me was not
. Therefore it will
remain dependent on a commercial product even on
linux! But if it works, this is acceptable in my
opinion, as CPRS itself can be modified by anyone
subsequently.
Nandalal
--- Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 25, 2006, at 5:18 AM, Nandalal Gunaratne
wrote
that could
prompt and print mammogram requests over the 10
years of our
surveillance?
What do they mean exactly by requests?
Ideally it would be a program which
would also act as a
very basic database of patients such that we could
recall all basic
details (i.e. Node positives or Grade
--- Adrian Midgley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as The Rt Hon Mr
Anthony Blair MP steps back to being a back bench
MP, the plan is likely
to fall apart.
I hope not! In the sense that the NHS forgets about
plans for EMR. Maybe a more sensible and practical
approach will result?
Nandalal
--
IT would seem to me that, what you favour is a system
where, all patients will have their EMR with their GPs
and nobody else and nowhere else. What is done in a
hospital encounter, for example a Urological Surgery,
Cardioloical tests, CT scan reports, will be sent to
the GP for inclusion in the
I presume you mean that holding it at the GP level is
far more stable for the patient?
Admin/manager changes can vary, and their approach to
change as well. THerefore it all depends. As for
change in underwear, this could vary as well, if you
listen to this story :-)
A customs officer was
in a
distributed
EMR with control by the patient. Sometimes we
called
this a Virtual Medical/Patient Record (about 10
years ago in a
journaled publication).
Dave
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
IT would seem to me that, what you favour is a
system
where, all patients will have their EMR
Why not hand over the keeping of the patient records
to patients ( like PING), where clinicians just upload
to this, and they also carry it with them in a storage
format that is secure and easily accessible?
The National Health Card Taiwan
I would certainly like to help. Since I am a Surgeon
interested in HIT (rather than a HIT specialist
interested in surgery!), tell me how I could help, and
I most certainly will.
Best regards
Nandalal
--- Thomas Beale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Will Ross wrote:
in other words, in my
Professor
Department of Family Medicine
McMaster University
- Original Message
From: Nandalal Gunaratne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openhealth@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 10:41:32 AM
Subject: Re: [openhealth] Re: GPs Revolt
Why
--- David Forslund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think
EHR applications should be interoperable without
having to use the same
underlying code. Given some time and effort I
would like to show that
OpenEMed
can accommodate the OpenEHR specifications.
Since the archetypes are central to
Done!
:-)
--- Ignacio Valdes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I've written an original book review on Marcel
Gagne's Moving to Free
Software book on Linux Medical News. Book reviews
tend to generate a
lot of traffic for a website but the current queen
of it all is Digg.
If you have
Hello Will,
I do not see any MPI projects in the OpenHRE except
the description of four Patient-Data Matching
Software.
The OpenEMed project is somewhat dormant and did not
have a fully developed MPI software based on it's
Person identification service. I am not sure if during
the aborted
--- Tim Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The African project OpenMRS (see
http://openmrs.org/wiki/OpenMRS ) is,
to my mind, the most exciting open source clinical
application at
present, in the field, good technical underpinnings,
and charging ahead.
Thanks Tim for this info, I was not
will result from the current
EIS RFP from the OMG which is currently
soliciting responses. The EIS is a joint effort
of the OMG and HL7. We would like to provide
an implementation of EIS as part of OpenEMed and
are soliciting help in anyone interested in doing
so.
Dave
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote
--- Molly Cheah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Open Source is also a open standard of software
development! We need to define/re-define these open
standards, remove the obsolete and invoke those of the
future.
As for objective 4, we need to discuss this now rather
than wait. Think big and start small
Hello THomas,
To give you an idea of the kind of thinking that
could be exposed, here
is my opinion:
I think they should be open and freely usable - in
fact I think the only
sensible business model for standards development is
to give them away
free and charge some money for
Hi Christian,
You are right on-the-ball here. What the asian
colleagues would want is exactly what you suggested -
intro to the core of the standards and what they mean
in simple short form. They may also want more
interactive hands on stuff regards FOSS apps rather
than talks on them. The thing
This is just the type of discussion we should have in
the May OSHCA Conference!!
FOSS interoperability - from theory to practice
Nandalal
--- David Forslund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Churches wrote:
Paul wrote:
Hi Dave,
Our API is built around the standard health
objects
The power of this approach is hard to appreciate
until you're in a
situation where lots of people have lots of things
they want to
characterize in a system. It allows non-developers
to own and
augment their own notions of what data matters to
them, without
altering the underlying
?
Nandalal
--- Thomas Beale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
The power of this approach is hard to appreciate
until you're in a
situation where lots of people have lots of
things
they want to
characterize in a system. It allows
non-developers
to own
and inaccuracy, will
last forever. The correct path is the middle path.
nandalal
--- Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Thomas,
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Beale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
The power of this approach is hard to
appreciate
I agree with Tim. The licensing is ambiguous in regard
to open licenses (OSI) and copyleft principles of
FOSS.
However OpenEHR may want to keep this open for
change.
The archetypes at least, must be protected from being
commercialised as they are the collaborative work of
many people.
Nandalal
Joseph
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
Does this have a GUI interface? IS there a demo
online
to try out?
Nandalal
--- Joseph Dal Molin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a couple of important clarifications to
Bhaskar's post:
Please note that this VERSION OF THE software
has
It was VistA itself I was asking about. Porting it to
Java was being attempted, was it not?
Nandalal
--- Joseph Dal Molin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CPRS is based on Delphi not MUMPSand yes it
is being ported to
Java by VA.
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
Right now
Will,
It is not a good idea to have sensitive information in
free text. If you do, it should not go to general
circulation, right?
How can one extract such info from free text? One way
is to remove such words from free text files using a
macro of some sort. FInd and replace can be used to
Thanks Ross!
Due to your question i have come to know the present
state of text mining and NLP. These will give you your
solution I guess.
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1089824dl=acmcoll=CFID=15151515CFTOKEN=6184618
nandalal
--- Will Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear 80n,
This is,
If Medsphere OpenVista is to be included in OSHCA,
alongside World Vista, please give me the details that
should be included and if any clauses need to be
mentioned.
Nandalal
--- Tim Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fred Trotter wrote:
The software in question was not VistA at all. It
was
I think Tim can add a home button on the first page
Nandalal
--- Molly Cheah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim,
When I click this Trial SIMILE link, it opens on
same window and does
not take me back to the previous page,
http://www.oshca.org/healthdir/
Maybe its better to make it open on a
--- Tim Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
it separates the data from the presentation. Not
every view has to use
or display every data element.
Tim C
This is what Zope does too!
Nanda
Tim and David,
I wonder if David is looking at the Tiddlywiki?
Given below is the part of the JSON file and the links
are correct. The CorbaMed link has been corrected.
It is not listed under standards anymore and is under
software applications. Is it necessary to have
application framework as
David,
You are the best person to advice us on this matter.
What should go into the open standards in
healthcare? section?
The list below is what I compiled for starters to be
edited and corrected.
Nandalal
Open Healthcare Framework (OHF) Project
eHealth Standardization Coordination Group
I think a map will be cool. There is a map in one of
the exibit demos, but it does not show up when I go
into it.
Tiddliywiki is a really nice tool. I can add a gui
toolbar to it and make it editable, then anyone can
easily edit it. It is easier than exibit in thay way.
But on the other hand
, Nandalal
Gunaratne wrote:
Subject: Re: [openhealth] Experimental OSHCA
catalogue of FOSS application for health and
healthcare
--- Tim Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
it separates the data from the presentation. Not
every view has to use
To get a visa we need a formal document to show that
there is a conference with dates and signed by
someone.
Nandalal
--- Molly Cheah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*Visa Requirements for Travel To Malaysia*
Your passport must be valid for at least 6 months...
We must not forget the end user who can contribute
ideas, report bugs and thus feels closer to the
developer and has a sense of belonging to a community
- our software.
Nandalal
--- Will Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dirk Riehle. The Economic Motivation of Open Source
Software:
Stakeholder
I do too!
Nandalal Gunaratne MS FRCS MRACS
--- Fred Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your application is sounding more and more
exciting!! I look forward to your
release!
-FT
On Dec 19, 2007 8:37 AM, Hemant Shah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Balu,
Good Sleuthing!
Yes, Jess
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
