> Quoting Sasha Khapyorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
>
> On 19:44 Tue 27 Feb , Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
> > >
> > > >I think with stacked git or just git and rebasing at key t
On 19:44 Tue 27 Feb , Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
> >
> > >I think with stacked git or just git and rebasing at key times, you
> > >could keep an ofed_1_2 tree that folks can easily apply patches to...
> > >
> > >I
> I think it'll be much more work to maintain all these branches.
> And again, there will be conflicts, and it's too easy to get confused when
> resolving a conflict.
Storing patches in a directory seems confusing to me. They must be applied in
a
specific order for everything to work, and that
> Quoting Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
>
> >But you cannot keep a stack for more than one backport pushed, right?
> >So you still need to be slapping the stacks of patches around for each
> >backport.
>
> Why not have separate branches for each kernels too?
> Quoting Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
>
> > > >
> > > > Sean, please install quilt and try using it for working with the system.
> > > > Adding new patch is usually done in this way
> > > > quilt new
> > > > quilt add
> > > > edit
> > > > quilt refresh
>
>But you cannot keep a stack for more than one backport pushed, right?
>So you still need to be slapping the stacks of patches around for each
>backport.
Why not have separate branches for each kernels too?
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general
> > >
> > > Sean, please install quilt and try using it for working with the system.
> > > Adding new patch is usually done in this way
> > > quilt new
> > > quilt add
> > > edit
> > > quilt refresh
> > >
> > > cp patches/ kernel_patches/fixes/
> > > git add kernel_patches/fixes/
> > > git comm
> > Lot's of stuff *is* in wiki already - did you look at pages Vlad
> > created?
>
> A search for "quilt" on the wiki turns up nothing (I checked before I
> posted :-) ).
>
> And yes, I have [thoroughly] read the pages Vlad created. But the
> very fact that this conversation is occurring
> > This is just my $0.01...
>
> It buys very little, if anything. In fact, a whole $0.02 also buys
> very little, if anything. So take my comments for what they're worth.
Oh, good, I thought deflation is getting out of hand ...
--
MST
___
op
> Quoting Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
>
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 19:44 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
> > >
> > > >I think with stacked git or just git and rebasing at ke
On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Lot's of stuff *is* in wiki already - did you look at pages Vlad
> created?
A search for "quilt" on the wiki turns up nothing (I checked before I
posted :-) ).
And yes, I have [thoroughly] read the pages Vlad created. But the
very
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 19:44 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
> >
> > >I think with stacked git or just git and rebasing at key times, you
> > >could keep an ofed_1_2 tree that folks can easily apply patches to...
> >
> This is just my $0.01...
Thanks for the suggestions, but what does $0.01 buy one in US today?
--
MST
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit ht
s that are helpful for OFA/
OFED development, they should be detailed on the wiki. The wiki is
where all permanent knowledge should be posted.
This is just my $0.01...
On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> Quoting Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Su
> Quoting Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
>
> >I think with stacked git or just git and rebasing at key times, you
> >could keep an ofed_1_2 tree that folks can easily apply patches to...
> >
> >Its too late to change this for 1.2, but you might want to reconsid
. Tsirkin wrote:
>> Quoting Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
>>
>> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 18:55 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>> Quoting Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>> Subject: Re
>I think with stacked git or just git and rebasing at key times, you
>could keep an ofed_1_2 tree that folks can easily apply patches to...
>
>Its too late to change this for 1.2, but you might want to reconsider
>the design for 1.3.
Can't we just create a new branch (ofed_1_2_patched) with these
> Quoting Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
>
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 18:55 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
>
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 18:55 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
> >
> > >Please send patches that will be added to kernel_patches/fixes.
> > >
> > >Please update your git tree from
> > >git://git.openfabrics.org/~vlad/o
> Quoting Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
>
> >Yes, actual patches should be created under kernel_patches/fixes.
> >
> >Please update your git tree because the following patch fails:
>
> Can you explain how the patch fails? I don't see how putting the patch in
>Yes, actual patches should be created under kernel_patches/fixes.
>
>Please update your git tree because the following patch fails:
Can you explain how the patch fails? I don't see how putting the patch into a
file helps.
>> Why not apply the patches directly?
>>
>To be consistent with 2.6.20 k
> Quoting Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
>
> >Please send patches that will be added to kernel_patches/fixes.
> >
> >Please update your git tree from
> >git://git.openfabrics.org/~vlad/ofed_1_2/.git ofed_1_2
>
> You want me to create a patch that adds a file
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 08:45 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
> >Please send patches that will be added to kernel_patches/fixes.
> >
> >Please update your git tree from
> >git://git.openfabrics.org/~vlad/ofed_1_2/.git ofed_1_2
>
> You want me to create a patch that adds a file that contains the actual
>
>Please send patches that will be added to kernel_patches/fixes.
>
>Please update your git tree from
>git://git.openfabrics.org/~vlad/ofed_1_2/.git ofed_1_2
You want me to create a patch that adds a file that contains the actual patches?
Why not apply the patches directly?
_
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 09:46 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
> Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:15 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
> > > I would like these fixes in OFED 1.2 as well. What git tree / branch
> > do I
> > > generate a patch against?
> > >
> > > - Sean
> >
> > git://git.
Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:15 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
> > I would like these fixes in OFED 1.2 as well. What git tree / branch
> do I
> > generate a patch against?
> >
> > - Sean
>
> git://git.openfabrics.org/~vlad/ofed_1_2/.git
> branch: ofed_1_2
Can you try pul
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:15 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
> I would like these fixes in OFED 1.2 as well. What git tree / branch do I
> generate a patch against?
>
> - Sean
git://git.openfabrics.org/~vlad/ofed_1_2/.git
branch: ofed_1_2
- Vladimir
>
> ---
>
> rdma_cm: remove unused node_guid from
I would like these fixes in OFED 1.2 as well. What git tree / branch do I
generate a patch against?
- Sean
---
rdma_cm: remove unused node_guid from cma_device structure.
ib_cm: remove ca_guid from cm_device structure.
rdma_cm: request reversible paths only.
ib_core: Set hop limit in ib_init_ah
28 matches
Mail list logo
