On Thursday 15 February 2007 20:30, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote:
> > > Yuk. I suppose I could write one, but I don't (and can't) use any of
> > > the OFED supplied build scripts in our build system, so it's hard for
> me
> > > to test since our build system is the only way I have to access
> > > ppc/pp
> > Yuk. I suppose I could write one, but I don't (and can't) use any of
> > the OFED supplied build scripts in our build system, so it's hard for
me
> > to test since our build system is the only way I have to access
> > ppc/ppc64 hardware.
> Oh, well.
> Other takers?
OK, I've no choice to say no
> Quoting Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: 32-bit build for ppc64 is required
>
> On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 18:29 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Subject: Re: 32-bit build for ppc64 is required
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 07
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 18:29 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: 32-bit build for ppc64 is required
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 07:57 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > > > The choice of 32/64 bit default is done on a per arch bas
> Quoting Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: 32-bit build for ppc64 is required
>
> On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 07:57 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > > The choice of 32/64 bit default is done on a per arch basis. With
> > > x86_64/i386, the increased number of CPU registers in 64b
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 08:40 +0100, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote:
> > So, what you suggest is - build 2 types of libraries, but on PPC make
> > binaries 32 bit? That's easy - do others agree to this approach?
> No, for execs please create 32bit and 64bit on PPC.
> > Another option is to build binaries wit
> Usually this should work, but I don't rely on that since we also support
> s390/s390x (although not with Infiniband, but the OpenMPI alternative
> that we shipped with RHEL4, lam, gets compiled on s390/s390x) and that
> pair is a bit of an odd mix and I don't have one setting here at my
> ho
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 07:57 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > The choice of 32/64 bit default is done on a per arch basis. With
> > x86_64/i386, the increased number of CPU registers in 64bit mode
> > outweighs the increased code bloat that goes along with 64bit mode. On
> > PPC, no such regi
> > And the
> > customers can pick the one(s) they like.
> > I see your point regarding QA effort. Is it really twice?
> Probably more - I'm reasonably sure most scripts written so far
> assume stuff is installed in prefix/bin, so testing harness etc
> would need to be changed.
> And how to make su
> Quoting Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: 32-bit build for ppc64 is required
>
> > So, what you suggest is - build 2 types of libraries, but on PPC make
> > binaries 32 bit? That's easy - do others agree to this approach?
> No, for execs please create 32bit and 64bit on PPC.
>
> So, what you suggest is - build 2 types of libraries, but on PPC make
> binaries 32 bit? That's easy - do others agree to this approach?
No, for execs please create 32bit and 64bit on PPC.
> Another option is to build binaries with whatever type of binary
> gcc without extra flags generates by de
> Quoting Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [openib-general] 32-bit build for ppc64 is required
>
> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 16:29 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Subject: Re: 32-bit b
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 16:29 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: 32-bit build for ppc64 is required
> >
> > On Wednesday 14 February 2007 14:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Quoting Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Subjec
> > Still, using non-standard hacks like bin32 does not sound like a good idea.
>
> I think the actual issue is there is no common approach for this on various
> platforms.
>
On platforms I've seen, there are 2 sets of libraries but only 64 bit
executables
provided.
This is what we had for OFED
Hi,
> Still, using non-standard hacks like bin32 does not sound like a good
idea.
I think the actual issue is there is no common approach for this on various
platforms.
> Maybe an option to *only* make 32 bit userspace might make sense though.
> Something like --disable-32bit, --disable-64bit.
> Th
> > Well, this is not by design: AFAIK on x86_64 both types of libraries
> > are installed.
> So, it seems to be an issue with the build script. Will talk to Vlad.
>
> > But I still do not see how installing 32 bit binaries alongside the 64
> > bit ones is useful, and I do not think other packages
Hi Vlad,
> prefix/lib (32bit libraries) should be created on ppc64 as well.
> Check that you have sysfsutils 32bit RPM installed.
> I don't have ppc64 here to check.
The current ofed-1.2 package does not, while ofed-1.1.1 has done.
It looks like that the one fix we did for ofed-1.1.1 were away.
If
Hi,
> Well, this is not by design: AFAIK on x86_64 both types of libraries
> are installed.
So, it seems to be an issue with the build script. Will talk to Vlad.
> But I still do not see how installing 32 bit binaries alongside the 64
> bit ones is useful, and I do not think other packages provide
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 15:18 +0100, Stefan Roscher wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 14:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Subject: 32-bit build for ppc64 is required
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > after building the latest ofed build package we
> Quoting Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: 32-bit build for ppc64 is required
>
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 14:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Subject: 32-bit build for ppc64 is required
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > after
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 14:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: 32-bit build for ppc64 is required
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > after building the latest ofed build package we recognized that on PPC64
> > only
> > 64-bit libaries were build.
> >
> Quoting Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: 32-bit build for ppc64 is required
>
> Hi,
>
> after building the latest ofed build package we recognized that on PPC64 only
> 64-bit libaries were build.
> Because we have customers using older userpace apllications which are
> certified f
Hi,
after building the latest ofed build package we recognized that on PPC64 only
64-bit libaries were build.
Because we have customers using older userpace apllications which are
certified for 32-bit we think additional 32bit support is a requirement for
64bit builds.
If OFED 1.2 supports 32 bi
23 matches
Mail list logo
