Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 10:37, Roland Dreier wrote:
By the way, reposting the receives is not the right thing to do on
error -- the QP will be in the error state, so any new work requests
will just complete with a flush status. We need to reset the QP and
start over to recover
Roland> By the way, reposting the receives is not the right thing
Roland> to do on error -- the QP will be in the error state, so
Roland> any new work requests will just complete with a flush
Roland> status. We need to reset the QP and start over to recover
Roland> from errors.
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 10:37, Roland Dreier wrote:
> By the way, reposting the receives is not the right thing to do on
> error -- the QP will be in the error state, so any new work requests
> will just complete with a flush status. We need to reset the QP and
> start over to recover from errors.
Hal> In ipoib_ib_handle_wc when status != success, isn't the WC
Hal> opcode invalid ? Also, in that case, don't receives also need
Hal> to be reposted ?
Roland> Yes, the error handling in IPoIB needs to be fixed.
By the way, reposting the receives is not the right thing to do on
e
Hal> In ipoib_ib_handle_wc when status != success, isn't the WC
Hal> opcode invalid ? Also, in that case, don't receives also need
Hal> to be reposted ?
Yes, the error handling in IPoIB needs to be fixed.
- R.
___
openib-general mailing li
