Hi Don, checking if we have a building / room for the board meeting. Also, want
to confirm the meeting time is from 3-5. There had been discussion on having it
longer to make better use of John and Nat's time.
-- Dick
___
board mailing list
Location is:
Google Building 46, 1565 Charleston Rd, Mountain View,
CAhttp://maps.google.com/maps?f=qsource=s_qhl=engeocode=q=1565+Charleston+Road,+Mountain+View,+CAsll=37.422768,-122.088666sspn=0.017177,0.033023ie=UTF8hq=hnear=1565+Charleston+Rd,+Mountain+View,+Santa+Clara,+California+94043z=17
I've been trying to authenticate on the foundation member site for the past
two days and have had no luck. I've been in touch with both Janrain and
Darin from Refresh to no avail. If I'm not the only one unable to
authenticate with my delegated OpenID, I wonder who else has been unable to
On 11/30/2010 01:51 AM, From Chris Messina:
I've been trying to authenticate on the foundation member site for the
past two days and have had no luck. I've been in touch with both
Janrain and Darin from Refresh to no avail. If I'm not the only one
unable to authenticate with my delegated
I was planning to nominate myself for the board tonight (was busy with
family over the weekend), but the UI to nominate myself has gone away. I
thought today (11/29) was the last day to nominate myself. Is that GMT or
something weird? Or was it 11/29 meaning 11/28 11:59p?
I'd really like to
I've been trying to stay out of this because I'm a candidate but in the
interest of clarity, mostly as a past election committee chair, I'm going to
communicate only facts and then entirely recurse myself from any involvement in
decisions made by the foundation based upon those facts. As the
And there are nearly a dozen people who got their nominations in on time...
On Nov 29, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Mike Jones michael.jo...@microsoft.com wrote:
I’ve been trying to stay out of this because I’m a candidate but in the
interest of clarity, mostly as a past election committee chair, I’m
Seems like my fate is sealed as well.
I for my part meant to second a few people, but failed to do so at approx 4pm.
The site gave no indication of time zone, and it did not even occur to me it
might be UTC. Those nominated people who don't have enough seconds could make
the -- to me -- very
Mailman bounced this email originated by Brian Kissel. I'm forwarding
to the list for Brian...
Don, can you please advise? I don't think it's our desire to block
folks due to confusion on the specific time the nominations were to
close. Also, I'd guess a number of folks would like time to
It looks to me like Chris has a legitimate problem with accessing the site, so
I do think we should rectify that.
I think it is unwise to start changing the election rules, and that you are
twits for leaving it to the day to do your nominations.
However there seem to be enough people in the
Because I'm a candidate, I'm going to stay out of this other than to suggest
that all people who are candidates or might be candidates should likewise
recuse themselves from participating in any decisions about whether to alter
the outcome of the nomination process or not.
I do believe that
To add some data to this discussion:
- the nomination period was opened two weeks ago
- it was clearly stated that times were Pacific
- 12 people nominated themselves for 5 board seats
- of those, 3 legitimate nominees did not receive enough seconds
(the fourth appears to be spam of some sort)
I didn't forget, I just chose to leave it to the last minute, which is a
common trait shared by many high performers. :p
If I'm the only one in this boat, and if the board would rather stick to the
11/29 means NOON pst than allow me to nominate myself, that's their
decision. But my guess is that
13 matches
Mail list logo
