Update...
The G11n consolidation code was to be updated to CLDR 1.9 which puts it more
inline with work elsewhere.
I took care of the fonts and a few other things.
This was by direction of the G11n team as I inquired about migrating to Unicode
6.x once released.
EveryCity/Illumos is
I have an installation of OpenSolaris b134, with lots of addons: SunRay
Software, mplayer, VirtualBox... almost anything I could find got installed.
Make no mistake: it is ALL useful to me and my users, so there isn't
anything that can be removed out-of-hand.
But: We do want to move on! OI
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 14:27, Hans J. Albertsson
hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote:
I have an installation of OpenSolaris b134, with lots of addons: SunRay
Software, mplayer, VirtualBox... almost anything I could find got installed.
Make no mistake: it is ALL useful to me and my users, so
I have the three bits of software you mention installed and had no
problem with the upgrade. Just saying. Not sure what else you are
having issues with In fact my system is more stable now (throws far
fewer core dumps anyway).
On 01/25/11 08:27 AM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
I have an
On 01/25/11 06:31, Daniel Kjar wrote:
installing from the bootable DVD iso, on the same machine, w/o
interfering with the existing OSol b134 environment
why not just run OpenIndiana in VIrtualbox?
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
Hi
in this month BSD (01/2011) issue, has an article comparing
OpenIndiana to the BSDs on the desktop.
the article starts on pg: 36 and it's a free download
OI is getting exposure :-)
http://bsdmag.org/
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
Ta for the link ... It's interesting and probably fair :)
On 25 January 2011 17:32, Edward Martinez mindbende...@live.com wrote:
Hi
in this month BSD (01/2011) issue, has an article comparing OpenIndiana to
the BSDs on the desktop.
the article starts on pg: 36 and it's a free download
Hi Ken,
On 25 Jan 2011, at 18:50, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 20:36 +, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi All,
I believe now would be a really good time for us to create our first stable
branch of OpenIndiana, given the timing of some developments within the
project.
Was
Am 25.01.11 19:58, schrieb Alan Coopersmith:
On 01/25/11 10:50 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
As for the MTA discussion, Postfix is pretty much a drop in replacement
for Sendmail, and my vote would be to replace Sendmail entirely.
I still don't understand this subthread - if someone wants to
On Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 13:52, Alasdair Lumsden alasdai...@gmail.com
said:
You are right though about needing more software in our repos, and this is
something we do intend to do via the OIAC project, please see:
http://wiki.openindiana.org/display/~guido/OI+Extra+Consolidation
If
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 21:52 +, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi Ken,
On 25 Jan 2011, at 18:50, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 20:36 +, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi All,
I believe now would be a really good time for us to create our first
stable branch of
I was wondering if anyone has insight into this problem I ran into.
While adjusting the link properties for an existing vnic, I found that
if you try to add more than 243 characters worth of comma separated IP
addresses to the allowed-ips= property, it results in the error
dladm: property list
Jonathan -
Though we do use dladm quite a bit, haven't run into this limitation of the
allowed property...
On the other hand, doesn't this property accept CIDR masking; wouldn't this go
a long way toward consolidating your 'allowed' requirements?
Lou
- Original Message -
On 01/26/11 07:03 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
On 25 January 2011 17:32, Edward Martinezmindbende...@live.com wrote:
Hi
in this month BSD (01/2011) issue, has an article comparing OpenIndiana to
the BSDs on the desktop.
the article starts on pg: 36 and it's a free download
OI is getting
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 10:58 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 01/25/11 10:50 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
As for the MTA discussion, Postfix is pretty much a drop in replacement
for Sendmail, and my vote would be to replace Sendmail entirely.
I still don't understand this subthread - if
Personally, whether it's sendmail, postfix, qmail or something else I
couldn't care less. We all have our MTA of choice.
For the mail server I pull whatever it is it out to run spamdyke/qmail
with an IMAP (dovecot) interface for access from all the other
machines. I've done it dozens of
On Jan 25, 2011, at 10:22 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 10:58 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 01/25/11 10:50 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
As for the MTA discussion, Postfix is pretty much a drop in replacement
for Sendmail, and my vote would be to replace Sendmail entirely.
Postfix is probably the easiest drop-in replacement. But IMO
a packaging of it should get lots of testing before going into
a stable distro, and regardless of which is eventually the
default or preferred choice, both should remain available.
I did poke around at this, but found that the
18 matches
Mail list logo
