On 21 Apr 2011, at 23:07, Toomas Soome wrote:
the basic math behind the scenes is following (and not entirely determined):
1. DTT data is kept in metadata part of ARC;
2. metadata default max is arc_c_max / 4.
note that you can rise that limit.
3. arc max is RAM - 1GB.
so, if
From: James Kohout [mailto:jkoh...@yahoo.com]
So looking to upgrade to io148 to be able to enable deduplication. So
does have any experience running a ZFS RaidZ2 pool with deduplication in
a production environment? Is ZFS deduplication in oi148 considered
stable/production ready? I
Hi, Ken
Today I found the URL had been changed for Intel 6250.
So if possible, I want to use iwl driver that is written in URL.
Could you send me it?
Regards.
Ryo
On 2011/04/21, at 4:47, ken mays wrote:
Hi Ryo,
There is no official Intel 6250 Wifi support yet for OpenIndiana.
The Intel
Hi Ryo,
http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/
~ Ken
--- On Fri, 4/22/11, 村川 了 fzz01...@nifty.ne.jp wrote:
From: 村川 了 fzz01...@nifty.ne.jp
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Where is iwl driver?
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Date: Friday, April 22,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
openindi...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: James Kohout [mailto:jkoh...@yahoo.com]
So looking to upgrade to io148 to be able to enable deduplication. So
does have any experience running a ZFS RaidZ2 pool with deduplication in
a production
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:07 AM, ken mays maybird1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Ryo,
http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/
What does that have to do with OpenIndiana?
-Albert
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
That was my understanding also. I thought that only the binary/distro
roll outs were stopping.
Can someone in the know comment further on this?
Jerry
On 04/22/11 08:23, Ben Taylor wrote:
I thought Oracle was going to continue to release source snapshots after
a binary release had been
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Jerry Kemp sun.mail.lis...@oryx.cc wrote:
That was my understanding also. I thought that only the binary/distro
roll outs were stopping.
Can someone in the know comment further on this?
This has been discussed a lot last year and this year.
There was a
The information about releasing the source was part of a leaked memo.
Oracle has made no official comitment to such a thing and the author
of the memo is no longer at Oracle.
No Oracle employee can reveal that information even if they had it
without risking both his job and a lawsuit.
On Fri, Apr
It appears that I mis-understood the memo.
Thanks for setting me straight.
Jerry
On 04/22/11 10:09, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
There was a leaked Oracle memo which stated that Oracle would stop
commits, and would make source code available only when the final
binary release of Solaris 11 was
On 04/22/11 08:03 AM, Jerry Kemp wrote:
Can someone in the know comment further on this?
Sorry, but no, we can't comment on that.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
On 04/22/11 08:09 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
At least one other project at opensolaris.org continues to receive
updates. This is the IPS project which I closely track. There may be
others too - I've not checked.
The Caiman installers do as well, as do the projects to build package
That's theory, in practice, even with sufficient RAM/L2ARC and some amount of
SLOG, dedup slows down writes to a minimum. My test was done with 8TB net
storage, 8GB RAM, and two 80GB x25-M SSDs devided into 2x4GB SLOG (mirrored)
and the rest for L2ARC. Application tested was Bacula with the OI
well, do a bit math. if ima correct, with 320B DTT the 1.75GB of ram can fit
5.8M entries, 1TB of data, assuming 128k recordsize would produce 8M
entries thats with default metadata limit. unless i did my calculations
wrong, that will explain the slowdown.
On 22.04.2011, at 21:19, Roy
14 matches
Mail list logo
