what are the NFS mount options?
what are the tcp window size
is jumbo frame on or off
bs=1024 is very small, did you test various different bs size?
ZFS what is the block size? stripwidth?
On 5/28/2011 8:52 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
This is kind of a mystery. Is it the same linux client in
This is kind of a mystery. Is it the same linux client in both cases?
-Original Message-
From: Pete Ashdown [mailto:pashd...@xmission.com]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:06 PM
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS Linux client slow reads
Both NFS tests wer
Setup: b 133 (opensolaris) on older athlon +3400 as home lan zfs server
No commercial operations, home use only.
Current hardware is dying and partially dead now.
I've laid zfs down for a good number of months. Not on purpose so
much as just too busy with life. Conseque
On 5/28/2011 1:53 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
The rationale included the words "SPARC V9 ABI", if I recall
correctly. It's not changing.
Yes: 4097659 64-bit FD_SETSIZE isn't V9 ABI compliant
IMHO, this means that this does not apply to x86_64 and so
the value should be adjusted
IMHO, exadata cell in oracle rac is very different beast, not sure your iozone
test make any sense
Sent from my iPad
Hung-Sheng Tsao ( LaoTsao) Ph.D
On May 28, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Gary wrote:
> On 5/27/11, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
>> It all depends, I guess. Some people get better performance
On 5/27/11, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
> It all depends, I guess. Some people get better performance with iSCSI,
> others with NFS. The big advantage of going NFS is that the OI server
> can back up user data by snapshotting the zfs filesystem on the OI
> server (this is not the only kind of backu
>> The rationale included the words "SPARC V9 ABI", if I recall
>> correctly. It's not changing.
>
> Yes: 4097659 64-bit FD_SETSIZE isn't V9 ABI compliant
>
IMHO, this means that this does not apply to x86_64 and so
the value should be adjusted in the upcoming release of Illumos.
A.S.
---
On May 28, 2011, at 5:45 AM, Matt Connolly wrote:
> I'd consider not using dedup given the cheap price of storage these days
> combined with limited ram in on that mobo. As in, the performance hit for the
> saved disk space wouldnt be worth it for my needs.
>>
IMHO, the RAM utilization expense
On 05/28/11 09:54 AM, Richard Lowe wrote:
> The rationale included the words "SPARC V9 ABI", if I recall
> correctly. It's not changing.
Yes: 4097659 64-bit FD_SETSIZE isn't V9 ABI compliant
--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform Engin
The rationale included the words "SPARC V9 ABI", if I recall
correctly. It's not changing.
-- Rich
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
On 05/28/11 07:48 AM, Ben Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos
> wrote:
>> Alan Coopersmith has posted the following in his blog:
>>
>> http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc/entry/there_i_fixed_it
>>
>>
>> The question is why FD_SETSIZE takes the value 65536 in the 64bit
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos
wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith has posted the following in his blog:
>
>
>
> http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc/entry/there_i_fixed_it
>
>
> The question is why FD_SETSIZE takes the value 65536 in the 64bit model?
I would assume that whoever changed di
Alan Coopersmith has posted the following in his blog:
http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc/entry/there_i_fixed_it
The question is why FD_SETSIZE takes the value 65536 in the 64bit model?
What would happen if the default value would be, say, 2048?
Regards,
Apostolos
--
Apostol
No, just a sparse file.
-Original Message-
From: Gabriele Bulfon [mailto:gbul...@sonicle.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 4:16 AM
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ZFS storage best practices
Hi, about the "thin-provisione file", do you mean a thin-p
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
>
>>> but you won't see deb distro guys going out of their way to make
>>> things familiar for rpm distro users and vice versa.
>>
>> You need to support both if you build Linux systems to customers.
>>
>
> But that is not the problem of t
On 28/05/2011, at 7:08 AM, Ray Arachelian wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 05:21 PM, Matt Connolly wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like an almost identical setup to what I have. Although I'm using a
>> Si3114 card. I have AHCI enabled in the bios, so my drivers are:
>>
>> Silicon Image si3114 = pci-ide
>> Intel SATA
Hi, about the "thin-provisione file", do you mean a thin-provisioned volume (a
zvol swith -s)
or something different?
--
Da: Dan Swartzendruber
A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Data: 27 maggio 2011 23.06.49 CEST
Ogge
17 matches
Mail list logo
