Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] experimental or otherwise not recommended options for ZFS

2012-01-30 Thread Jan Owoc
Thank you for the replies. On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Sašo Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com wrote: The obvious saying springs to mind: RAID != backup. If you need your data to be safe, have two copies of it in two geographically separate locations running in two separate machines. I've

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Libreoffice

2012-01-30 Thread cpforum
The future seems to be LibreOffice, but is OpenOffice really dead ? OpenOffice is now an Apache incubating project hosted by the Apache foundation. Someone know if people have plans to build future release for Solaris 11 x86/OpenIndiana ? ___

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] experimental or otherwise not recommended options for ZFS

2012-01-30 Thread Robbie Crash
If you want to use Fletcher, you need to use verify, as the likelihood of collisions is increased since Fletcher is not *random*. You don't really need to verify when using SHA256, and by default, SHA256 is used with dedup, not Fletcher. . More information about the checksumming and trade-offs can

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] experimental or otherwise not recommended options for ZFS

2012-01-30 Thread Jan Owoc
Hi Robbie, On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Robbie Crash sardonic.smi...@gmail.com wrote: If you want to use Fletcher, you need to use verify, as the likelihood of collisions is increased since Fletcher is not *random*. You don't really need to verify when using SHA256, and by default, SHA256

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Libreoffice

2012-01-30 Thread Jerry Kemp
I am on the Apache Openoffice mailing list, and I can say that there are plans for Solaris. IMHO, and FWIW, the Apache group seems to be (or at least act like) a very large organization. The feel of the group to me is that they are still getting their ducks all lined up on many different fronts,

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Crossbow performance bit rot

2012-01-30 Thread Jason Matthews
So I have determined the trigger event for the resets in the response times. It appears that there is some sort of memory leak in the kernel. When memory utilization gets very high, I am not sure how high but it is around a few hundred bytes on the freelists with zfs data near zero, the reset

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Crossbow performance bit rot

2012-01-30 Thread James Carlson
Jason Matthews wrote: So I have determined the trigger event for the resets in the response times. It appears that there is some sort of memory leak in the kernel. When memory utilization gets very high, I am not sure how high but it is around a few hundred bytes on the freelists with zfs