Hey James,
Am 23.06.2013 um 02:10 schrieb James Relph ja...@themacplace.co.uk:
Just been looking into this a bit and I wondered if the was any chance that
this group issue could be causing problems (users are in a lot of groups):
https://bugzilla.samba.org/process_bug.cgi
guess you're
Wow, just when I was looking for a new box to add too. I already have
the older 36 drive 4U box but they have managed to double the capacity
in 4U of space in less than five years and with 3.5 drives too?
Have you tried this Saso? Illumos runs on that board and with the
onboard SAS
On 23/06/2013 14:30, Christopher Chan wrote:
Have you tried this Saso?
I haven't tried that particular box, but given that physical
construction is irrelevant when dealing with compatibility, I wouldn't
worry about it. What matters is what chips are in there.
Beware about depth of the machine,
On 2013-06-23 2:10 AM, James Relph wrote:
Just been looking into this a bit and I wondered if the was any
chance that this group issue could be causing problems (users are in
a lot of groups):
https://bugzilla.samba.org/process_bug.cgi
Does the current version of cswsamba have those patches?
If Andrew doesn't respond, let me know. It shouldn't be too hard to get these
right for Samba 4.
Thanks Frank, I think Samba4 looks in general a little easier - even the
compilation seems more straightforward than 3. The benefit there is I can get
Samba4 to actually use winbind properly!
You should be able to just upgrade to them:
pkgutil -t http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/opencsw/experimental/laurent -u
Hi Lauren,
Thanks for that, the patches seem to work and I can use netatalk with winbind
still (with more groups now!), but SMB is still a no go, I just get:
On 23/06/2013 22:23, James Relph wrote:
Hi Lauren,
Laurent with a 't', so it's male, just for the record ;-)
Thanks for that, the patches seem to work and I can use netatalk with
winbind still (with more groups now!),
Okay, good to know, I'll see if upstream will get the patches in or if
Laurent with a 't', so it's male, just for the record ;-)
Sorry, typo there, I did get it right earlier!
Careful, IIRC, the No such user answer for Samba is an authentication
issue, you can get that even when the user is indeed there, but with eg a bad
password. While the pam results
On Monday, June 24, 2013 07:24 AM, James Relph wrote:
Yep, if I setup other PAM bits I can login via (for instance) SSH, and
netatalk worked pretty much straight away. I'll bring this up on the
samba lists and see if anyone has any ideas. Samba4 is working pretty
well, so that might be an
Hi,
I'm running a home NAS using OI 151a7 server (vs. desktop). I was
thinking of running Ubuntu Server in a virtual machine on OI, ideally
configured to startup/shutdown when OI starts/shuts down. I can
connect a monitor to the machine, but it generally should run
headless.
I found there is a
On Monday, June 24, 2013 10:24 AM, Jan Owoc wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a home NAS using OI 151a7 server (vs. desktop). I was
thinking of running Ubuntu Server in a virtual machine on OI, ideally
configured to startup/shutdown when OI starts/shuts down. I can
connect a monitor to the machine, but it
11 matches
Mail list logo
