The 4 TB Constellation ES.3 is 512b native sectors.
If you want 4K sectors on it you can override in /kernel/drv/sd.conf. The
drive will still be 512b, but ZFS will use ashift=12 when configuring.
This is working for me on pool built with these drives.
I have had very good experience with
I'm considering putting together a storage server running OI and I'm
wondering about whether I should have to fill all the slots from the start
if I don't need that much storage yet.
For example, if I have 8 1TB drives and 4 empty slots to start with, and I
configure the zpool as RAIDZ2, and then
Udo Grabowski (IMK) udo.grabow...@kit.edu writes:
[...]
PS - Do you have any idea what role guile would play if the headers and
such were available?
pkg install guile
It's all there on oi_151a7 just read the packagemanager.
Well, not exactly... if it were all there I wouldn't be
James Carlson carls...@workingcode.com writes:
On 07/29/13 12:13, Harry Putnam wrote:
PS - Do you have any idea what role guile would play if the headers and
such were available?
Guile is a Scheme-based application extension mechanism. Having it
available in xbindkeys means you can do more
In regard to: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] build xbindkeys from source, Harry...:
Udo Grabowski (IMK) udo.grabow...@kit.edu writes:
[...]
PS - Do you have any idea what role guile would play if the headers and
such were available?
pkg install guile
It's all there on oi_151a7 just read
Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu writes:
Is there an answer to my question above (at the PS -) in those details
somewhere? If so it is well hidden.
Someone else answered that question earlier. Basically, if you build
with guile support, then you can do slightly fancier things with your
Hi Mark,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Mark Creamer white...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm considering putting together a storage server running OI and I'm
wondering about whether I should have to fill all the slots from the start
if I don't need that much storage yet.
There are certain things you
On 07/31/13 13:18, Harry Putnam wrote:
Sorry to be such a knothead here, but, what advantage would there be
to writing keybindings in Scheme?
Besides the pure joy of using a lisp-like language? ;-}
I mean as against writing them in the notation of xbindkeys like these
sort of notations:
