[OpenIndiana-discuss] 10GigE vs Infiniband vs SCSI Target ...

2013-11-18 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana)
ZFS is great to manage backend storage in a SAN environment. So then you're likely to use 10GigE, or Infiniband as the transport... I only recently discovered SAS SFF-8088. Gives you 4x 6Gbit buses yielding 24 Gbit with very low overhead, low cost. A lot of performance for the buck. I also

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Local zones as SMF service instances

2013-11-18 Thread Lou Picciano
Jim, Thanks for this add; will be very useful. We're finding zone startup to be wildly variable, even without all the concerns around interdependencies. It often devolves into a manual process. Lou Picciano - Original Message - From: Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru To: Discussion list

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Bug or feature in SMF? svcadm restart vs disable+enable

2013-11-18 Thread Jim Klimov
Hello all, While testing my works on SMF inter-dependencies (such as with my recent write-up on SMFization of local zones), I discovered that if I run svcadm restart, then the dependency service (a zone) stops first, and only when its state changes to offline, the dependent services (zones)

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Virtualbox 4.3.x (2!) and oi 151a8? working?

2013-11-18 Thread Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator]
Hi, well, i didn't measured anything, that is just my 'impression'... And it behaves very stable (didn't had any kind of crash, since 4.2.8). I have moved into '/hipster' repository (so, not production level at all) and since Hipster has often updates, do not take my statement as something

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Virtualbox 4.3.x (2!) and oi 151a8? working?

2013-11-18 Thread Michael Stapleton
Works well for me other than not being able to boot iPXE. 4.3 goes to GURU meditation with iPXE. But it does it on all platforms. Windows and Linux. Mike On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 15:43 +0100, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator] wrote: Hi, well, i didn't measured anything, that is

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bug or feature in SMF? svcadm restart vs disable+enable

2013-11-18 Thread Gary Mills
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:27:42PM +0100, Jim Klimov wrote: While testing my works on SMF inter-dependencies (such as with my recent write-up on SMFization of local zones), I discovered that if I run svcadm restart, then the dependency service (a zone) stops first, and only when its state

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bug or feature in SMF? svcadm restart vs disable+enable

2013-11-18 Thread Jim Klimov
Thanks for a response, replies inline. On 2013-11-18 20:02, Gary Mills wrote: On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:27:42PM +0100, Jim Klimov wrote: While testing my works on SMF inter-dependencies (such as with my recent write-up on SMFization of local zones), I discovered that if I run svcadm

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bug or feature in SMF? svcadm restart vs disable+enable

2013-11-18 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 528a74a1.7010...@cos.ru, Jim Klimov writes: Yes, of course. Being a service under its local zone's SMF control, the database starts and stops correctly. And so does the appserver in its zone. The problem is that when the appserver-zone depends on the database-zone, and I do svcadm

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] vncserver behavior after upgrading to 151a8

2013-11-18 Thread Roel_D
Has anyone already got VNC working in a zone? I ended up with an error for gdm. [ID 702911 daemon.warning] inetd_offline method for instance svc:/application/x11/xvnc-inetd:default is unspecified. Taking default action: kill. State: offline since Mon Nov 18 17:06:38 2013 Reason: Dependency

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Local zones as SMF service instances

2013-11-18 Thread Jim Klimov
On 2013-11-18 04:45, Jim Klimov wrote: Hello all, If you were ever annoyed by having all zones starting and stopping as a wild herd on a stampede, while you want them to be orchestrated in a particular order? Then check this out: http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Zones+as+SMF+services