I've been trying to find what powerloss protected SSDs are available in
sweden.
The only ones I can find that are generally available are Samsung 843
and Intel S3500. The Intel S3500 costs about 1300 SEK (145 €??) each at
120GB.
The Seagates are NOT available anywhere that I can see.
Samsung
Has this moved forward yet?
On 2014-02-06 18:51, carl brunning wrote:
If no one else will hosts it then yes I will put it on my website and give a
link to it for other till a better place for it happens
Thank
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Apostolos Syropoulos
Looking at https://www.illumos.org/issues/3881 and
http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182190/2013/09/sort/time_rev/page/1/entry/3:14/
I get the impression, the cpqary3 driver should be already available.
Could anyone help getting hold of the binaries?
Cheers
Stefan
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Hans J. Albertsson
hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote:
Samsung 843
The 843 while called and enterprise SSD, does not have capacitors for power
loss protection.
http://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/samsung-843/2/
Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a bit
more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the S3700 or S3500
but they are a LOT less expensive.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Schweiss, Chip c...@innovates.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:22 AM,
On 2014-02-10 22:50, Doug Hughes wrote:
Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a bit
more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the S3700 or S3500
but they are a LOT less expensive.
Also, read at least the official specs - the S3500 seems a lot less
Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a
bit more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the
S3700 or S3500 but they are a LOT less expensive.
This thread started out as a discussion of the merits of the HP N54L
microserver for home use. I am not really
2014.02.09. 22:19 keltezéssel, Jim Klimov írta:
2*120Gb Samsung Pro SSDs (with powerloss
protection, formatted to use 100Gb for mirrored rpool/mirrored
zil/striped l2arc since their 100Gb sub-model has much higher
reliability and speed - but is not on sale here).
Jim
Only one question about
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote:
This thread started out as a discussion of the merits of the HP N54L
microserver for home use. I am not really sure if a home server needs
mirrored battery-protected SSDs. :-)
I tend to agree with this. My approach is
true, Volker..
Just to note though, the 320s have no battery, but they do have enough
capacitor to flush anything from the small ram into flash on power outage.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote:
Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for
smartctl -x reports the wear on decent ones (read: you shouldn't consider
any that doesn't have this feature). When it gets close to 0, or you see a
lot of errors, it's time to replace it.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Brogyányi József bro...@gmail.com wrote:
2014.02.09. 22:19 keltezéssel,
Surprised someone hasn't developed a SATA power cable with small battery
Passthrough for this exact application.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Doug Hughes d...@will.to wrote:
true, Volker..
Just to note though, the 320s have no battery, but they do have enough
capacitor to flush anything
capacitors are better. Batteries wear out and are difficult to have the
correct monitoring for replacement.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Ben Taylor bentaylor.sol...@gmail.comwrote:
Surprised someone hasn't developed a SATA power cable with small battery
Passthrough for this exact
While I agree that monitoring is good, and batteries wear out, and this is
a problem in production environments. For a hobbyist, where I can take
down my system without permission from my boss or business unit, it is
really that bad of an idea?
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Doug Hughes
Wouldn't a UPS with monitoring be a better alternative? Allow the server to
power down safely on UPS when it detects a power lost state. Most UPSes I
know have either serial or USB monitoring, sometimes even Ethernet on
higher-end models (although I've never looked at the monitoring systems in
I have asked this question before but I am going to try to rephrase it.
when i look at the output from iostat -nMxCz 1 i see something that looks like
following on my shinny new servers running 151a9. I was previously rev-locked
on 151a1.
my question is why do the numbers for the zpool not
On 10 February 2014 18:02, jason matthews ja...@broken.net wrote:
my question is why do the numbers for the zpool not resemble the sum of the
parts? for example busy reports 56% for the pool but no device in the pool is
more than 40% busy, in this example.
In both cases, the % busy column
Is that really true:
The press reslease from Samsung in the US said explicitly:
The integrated Power loss function includes tantalum capacitors, thus
ensuring the data is written while power failure.
On 2014-02-10 22:32, Schweiss, Chip wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Hans J.
The SSD I'm looking at is a Samsung 843T, note the T.
Maybe there's a non - T variety w/o the powerloss protection??
On 2014-02-11 08:28, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
Is that really true:
The press reslease from Samsung in the US said explicitly:
The integrated Power loss function includes
That was it. The 843 has no powerloss protection short-term backup power
supply, the 843T does have tantalum powerloss backup caps.
On 2014-02-11 08:42, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
The SSD I'm looking at is a Samsung 843T, note the T.
Maybe there's a non - T variety w/o the powerloss
20 matches
Mail list logo
