Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How many versions of libs/apps should OI provide?

On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Jim Klimov wrote: Bob, do you mean symbols like 'this requires SUNW_1.23'? Yes, these are here too. I believe they do not quite work around the issue James describes, e.g. when your running binary pulls two copies of different libjpeg.so.* even with proper versioning.

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How many versions of libs/apps should OI provide?

29 декабря 2016 г. 22:25:23 CET, Bob Friesenhahn пишет: >On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, James Carlson via openindiana-discuss wrote: >> Now we deliver a new libfoo.so.2. The guy who maintains our >application >> is a real go-getter, so he relinks and redelivers binaries

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How many versions of libs/apps should OI provide?

On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, James Carlson via openindiana-discuss wrote: Now we deliver a new libfoo.so.2. The guy who maintains our application is a real go-getter, so he relinks and redelivers binaries almost right away. When the application runs, it pulls in libfoo.so.2 and (via the libbar.so.1

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana upgrade

Hi. On 29.12.2016 19:26, russell wrote: Hi, I have been able to perform updates using which I find does work. # pkg refresh --full # pkg update --be-name openindiana-hipster-NN Try ' pkg update -v

[OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana upgrade

Hi, I have been able to perform updates using which I find does work. # pkg refresh --full # pkg update --be-name openindiana-hipster-NN However, when attempt to perform an image update # pkg image-update -v --be-name openindiana-hipster-NN Creating Plan (Running solver): / pkg update: No