That's not a bittorrent magnet link! :-O
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:52 PM, cpforum cpfo...@orange.fr wrote:
OpenSource part of Solaris 11 11/11 are available at the following url :
http://oss.oracle.com/systems-opensourcecode/
Go to ORACLE SOLARIS/Oracle Solaris 11 11/11/
Oracle Solaris
Well, if someone would make use of those files that Oracle shared in
bittorrent, we could make S11 upgreadable to OI, so no one would loose any
server if Orcale goes nuts and kills architectures... That would be a very
important task.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Shain Singh
Ummm, Larry has been watching epic movies again! It is a legal Trojan
horse!... how innovative!; they drop their own trade secrets marked as CDDL
and wait for the unaware computer enthusiast to use it and sue him badly!
He is truly worst than Gargamel...
Well the only option he had to prevent
Oracle has rights over their code and trademarks, but as well
responsibilities.
The code could only be distributed by someone who was granted clearance to
the code (someone with a contractual relationship with Oracle).
Oracle is allowing the continuation of the circumstances that are
That was a good article, tnks!
I remember those estrange days when nothing was said about what happened to
Opensolaris, somehow the silence reminds me of WWII; It makes more
psychological damage to make someone disappear without telling a word, than
executing him in public. I wonder if this thing
Roy, I couldn't agree more...
You all deserve a penance:
Go back home and tell one hundred holy Larrys!
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net
wrote:
This seems potentially bad all the way around to me. Hopefully this
turns out to be a real, officially
It takes 2 comands to learn smf, swaping from ubuntu to gentoo is damn
harder than reading the Solaris howtos.
I think adoption wont be such a problem in terms of usability
differences with linux, first of all we should start by letting people
notice that we are not dead as they think we are.
What about the passionate fights? If we move to a forum we are going
to miss them. :P
This list became part of life alrready.
I kind of like this.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Richard L. Hamilton rlha...@smart.net wrote:
On Oct 8, 2011, at 9:49 PM, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Sat, Oct
When David Carlson told Microsoft that their main marketing challenge
was that people hated them, they were staring at him as if they
couldn't understand what he was saying...
Someones never learn
Cheers
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Open Indiana openindi...@out-side.nl wrote:
This is very
Nice selection of packages, thankyou very much indeed.
regards,
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Alasdair Lumsden alasdai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
On 30 Jul 2011, at 21:54, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
snip
Alex Viskovatoff
N.B. Prashanth
Guido Berhoerster
Great work all! This is a very
Indigo is one of the 7 colors of the rainbow. Quite nice blue. I dont mean
using the name, sgi did once uppon a time, but I just point some indi
thing that came to my head.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Benediktus Anindito bennybroz...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:45 AM,
Nice tutorial, thanks
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Chris Mosetick cmoset...@gmail.com wrote:
I have OpenIndiana running on several machines. On one of them, I'm using
OpenIndiana b148 as my main operating system, storage server and virtual
machine host all in one physical machine. It
Strategical decisions with not so large boundaries on the technical side, I
mean, they are not really saving much effort!
ZFS feeds on memoy like chupacabra does on blood, but still there is still
some life to those old 32 bit devices on the networking side of the game. We
dont trash servers so
We all know how good illumos is from a technical point of view, but
executives know nothing but what they can see.
Visual aparence is probably the only thing they can understand, looking
cheap is good for Oracle, bad for us.
It could be really hard to implement illumos based products across an
will they give opensolaris to apache as well :P
lol
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Dan Swartzendruber dswa...@druber.comwrote:
Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2011/06/oracle-gives-openoffice-to-apa.html
Of course the article is terrible and myopic since
-The plan was so simple; we purchase sun, kick out the hippies, and make
real business.
-well...
-Does this mean that we cannot sell corporate licenses of openoffice
anymore?
-well..
-Did anyone wrote a plan B? anyone?...
-...
-What were those indians called?
-Sir, do you mean Apaches?
-Whatever,
The name is the only thing Oracle owns at this moment...
The rest is out there alrready.
What they should do is to donate the trademark to the document foundation
and stop messing around with the thing.
:-O
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Hillel Lubman shtetl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu,
if it involves handling out a trademark.
Cheers
2011/6/2 Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Gabriel de la Cruz
gabriel.delac...@gmail.com wrote:
The name is the only thing Oracle owns at this moment...
The rest is out there alrready.
What
Just for curiosity, what controler are you using?
Br
gab
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Pete Ashdown pashd...@xmission.com wrote:
On 05/25/2011 04:33 PM, BM wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Pete Ashdown pashd...@xmission.com
wrote:
This gives me some pause as I'm in the process
foward to see wht illumos has to offer in this respect.
br,
g
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Pete Ashdown pashd...@xmission.com wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:40:40AM +0300, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
Just for curiosity, what controler are you using?
LSI 9211 8i 4i
Br
gab
The most admin friendly distro I ever used was called opensolaris...
This kind of discussions discusion has to do with taste, educating your
taste involves learning to enjoy the differences, there is no point in
making everithing to taste the same.
Br
gab
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Sean
Hi,
could someone point me out what is going on here?,
I have an IBM x3550 M3 panicking with any kernel version higher than
svn_111...
I tried upgrading to svn_134, installing svn_134 from live cd and with
oi_148b live cd..
The live CDs panic as well.
Any ideas?
Thanks! :D
/
- Gabriel de la Cruz gabriel.delac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
could someone point me out what is going on here?,
I have an IBM x3550 M3 panicking with any kernel version higher than
svn_111...
I tried upgrading to svn_134, installing svn_134 from live cd and with
oi_148b live cd..
The live
Hi,
your list looks very familiar to me;
I had something similar on a supermicro motherboard, if you did not
configure all the independent drives as separate jbods in the raid
controller, the order of the drives was mysteriously swapping at boot
time. Neither ZFS, neither a conventional raid on
Ummm that bug report says the 2 magic keywords: Jbod, and
Supermicro... And the motherboard model is a close one too :O
Make sure that jour jbods are configured in whatever type of bios your
controller uses, every drive should be a jbod on its own. This looks
just like the problem I had (and
This is an entry level proliliant, very standard gear. I cannot
believe that you would be the first one using them with ZFS (those
sell really well) Is the Jbod configured? I mean, are all the the
drives correctly defined in whatever config utility provided at boot
time?
Are the drives in both
Hello, I am interested as well
:-O
Thanks :-D
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Darko Hojnik hoj...@virtualizing.org wrote:
Hello Bruno
Ir would be nice to get the as an attachment. Thank you so much!
cheers Darko
Am 31.03.2011, 07:22 Uhr, schrieb Bruno Damour ll...@ruomad.net:
Le
No problem!
Please enjoy the trip!
BR
gab
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Bruno Damour ll...@ruomad.net wrote:
Hello,
I will.
Away travelling so it may take a couple of days...sorry
Bruno
- Mail Original -
De: Gabriel de la Cruz gabriel.delac...@gmail.com
À: Discussion list
Thankyou :D
I will make a good use of it.
BR
Gab
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Bruno Damour ll...@ruomad.net wrote:
There is a compiled version for opensolaris, can be downloaded.
I have smf manifest / function working (tweaked from old sun versions) I
can share
Bruno
PS : running
OSX is based on nextstep
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NeXTSTEP
SUN developed it to its next release called OPENSTEP
It was later on purchased by Apple
The world is small, isnt it?
Openings seem to close by business nature.
Cheers
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Nemo cym...@gmail.com wrote:
Web Server : Apache/2.2.15 (Fedora) --Wow!
Powered-by : PHP/5.2.13
Injection Type: MySQL Blind
Here is how to patch your system:
Glassfish
Java
PostgreSQL
;-P
And problem solved...
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:14 AM, openindi...@out-side.nl wrote:
I don't see why not to use a bridge either, promiscuous mode at the
level you have on your setup should be meaningless to your data
center.
You wont be the first one doing this kind of setup, most of network
virtualization deployments would be impossible otherwise.
BR
g
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at
The Solaris OS was carefully designed as a product, Linux is a
combination of technollogies carefully developed to interact with
eachother but created in independent projects. Both of them a very
well made, but the way how all the parts within Solaris relate to
eachother is more consistent.
You should have as much fear as if you are using linux.
I would say that US companies might have a larger probability of
getting in such a mad situation because of the intensive B to B court
tradition.
Anyway, SUN was the home of opensource, they cannot change the past.
living in the edge ;-)
I just point out that my previous mail was sarcastic,
;P
Cheers
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Gary gdri...@gmail.com wrote:
I find it highly unlikely they'd go after an open source project that
has no money to fork over. If they were to stoop that low, they'd go
after any company that's
Hello,
The search I have done so far gave me no answer, just to make sure
that I am not missing something important, I would like to ask you
some general questions about xVM and oi.
I have a server running Opensolaris and xVM, will it be able upgrade
to the first stable release of OI? It looks
Sea turtles, newly hatched on a beach, will automatically move toward
the ocean. A joey climbs into its mother's pouch upon being born.
Honeybees communicate by dance the direction of a food source without
formal instruction. And every mammal understands the difference
between illumos and
Hi, with ZFS you dont need a raid card, ZFS will handle the drives on
its own. However, if you are mirroring, the performance improves if
both drives are on different controllers. Any controller supported by
OI will do well for that purpose. I guess any PCI-E will do the job. A
setup could be like
Hi,
ATOM wont support ECC memory, so It wont make a mission critical
storage device, but if you are storing movies, probability you will
never notice a memory corruption problem. The data will be many times
safer than in a regular file system, but wont be as safe as in a
server using ECC memory.
Official training is important for both development and certifying
your knowledge. Sun courses were good, and their exams very well made,
it would be very difficult that anyone without a good knowledge about
the subject gets certified. I know some people for example who is very
good administering
wrote:
On Jan 18, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
by the way, if anyone has a good idea how to implement a new kind of
Openindiana administrative web gui tool, for example in order to
handle some config settings, I could give a hand with the web
interface.
webmin seems to do
Thanks!
A place to start is a place to start, and an stable server release is
the most urgent one among all the other options.
Some people is talking about the server-desktop question, I
particularly liked the old Solaris software groups concept (reduced
network, core, end user, entire)... woulnt
Gabriel,
On 01/17/11 10:07 AM, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
Thanks!
A place to start is a place to start, and an stable server release is
the most urgent one among all the other options.
Great - thanks for the feedback!
Some people is talking about the server-desktop question, I
particularly liked
somewhat apply. ;-)
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:19 +0200, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
Dear Mr Christopher Chan
Different points of view, remarks, or complains of any short from person
to
person shouldn't be understood as serious faults to the honor of anyone,
as
long as we do
Log in the Opensolaris Live CD and run zpool import, the literature is
very fast to read. Just follow the instructions.
zpool import --help will list your options,
You can read this if you don't feel like reading at the terminal, just check
the import sections.
Thankyou very much for all the previous advises about how to roll back from
one system to the next.
Oracle might want to offer the Indians a possibility to convert to their own
religion but probably not all the way around. So I would consider SE(x)11 a
system trap and keep it away from my
Ummm S11 can upgrade from Opensolaris... maybe OpenIndiana could upgrade
from Solaris 11.. so the vendor lockup gets killed... This would be good and
bad for Oracle, bad because people can free themselves from the heavy load
of pricing whenever they want without the need of starting from the
Well they corrected the 30 days trial smart move with a not so different
approach.
I could make a long list of possible users others than businesses and
coders, but Oracle should work it out on their own.
I don't think their restrictions makes a real benefit for them, at all. With
their hight
Frank,
Good question. It al depends in Oracle and what kind of follow up OI makes,
if Oracle release their sources from time to time it would be easier to roll
from one system to the other, but if nothing happens probably we end up with
very close systems in terms of functionality but without such
SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
flexibility. Could it be a good practice to install Openindiana before
Solaris11?, so there is a roll back option? difficult to answer... I
guess
they will keep the possibility to upgrade from Opensolaris for a while...
Why
u... I have been reading the features... and I did not try the system...
but from the paper looks as if the open and close Solaris versions merged
together.
Thinking about the gap from 10 to 11, I see mostly a branding gap, a
licensing gap, and a philosophical gap rather than a technical
:D
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Sriram Narayanan sri...@belenix.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:13 PM, L'oiseau de mer oiseau...@gmail.com
wrote:
Have there the System V Packages Version?(.pkg)
My OpenSolaris 2009.06 can't use it.
These are IPS packages :)
-- Sriram
Hi,
I have a few servers running hardened Gentoo, and I feel terribly excited
with DragonflyBSD, I was administering a purely mac enviroment for quite
some time...
But I run opensolaris seamlessly from my 2 racks, untill my travel netbook
(including my office). According to my taste it is a hell
Not so desktop issues are; you need more memory than average, and I prefer
to use good gear on desktops as well, not the typical Dell office stuff-
Cheers
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Gabriel de la Cruz
gabriel.delac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a few servers running hardened Gentoo
The iron man prefers promoting his balls, but he should focus on different
features; for example if you compare a self tuning Solaris kernel with the
linux bare metal work he should swap to the Tampax style:
Are you tired of compiling your kernel every month, Solaris makes you
happy. Just imagine
I mean the burning each other... sorry comments gets wild :-D
Cheers
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Nathan Evans ndickinson.ev...@gmail.comwrote:
Well, yes there are flames, and witches burned alive, but we are learning
to
behave. ;-D hopefully,
Larry Ellison is not a witch at
Congrats to the new corporate master, nice dose of negative marketing.
Deception is not easily fixed, no matter how good sales man you have.
Once again, sad story.
Br
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Nathan Evans ndickinson.ev...@gmail.comwrote:
WOW!
Oracle really lost out when they started
Ok, if please don't help. no help then.
cheers
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 2:59 PM, James O'Gorman ja...@netinertia.co.uk wrote:
On 9 Oct 2010, at 17:07, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
I like as well other variations such as Indiana CORE. That will work
if we intend this distro to be the mother-ship
, and expecting some basic politeness wasn't really
much to ask. Terms such as Open- or community don't really fit such an
attitude.
Good luck
Gab
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Gabriel de la Cruz
gabriel.delac...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, if please don't help. no help then.
cheers
On Sun
out there.
If this were a real online forum rather than a mail list with an online
archive some of these issues of 'don't waste my time' would disappear.
On 10/10/2010 09:31 AM, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
Well, I told a few many times that I am ok with openindiana, and there
is no one trying
a real online forum rather than a mail list with an online
archive some of these issues of 'don't waste my time' would disappear.
On 10/10/2010 09:31 AM, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
Well, I told a few many times that I am ok with openindiana, and there
is no one trying to change anything we
Hello,
Jesus, nice hint, Polaris sounds very nice as a brand, but I am afraid
the patent office wont let us make a trademark for an OS with that
name, as there is only 1 letter difference... that will be acceptable
if we choose different classes of goods to be named with it, we could
name
By the way, the gray should be darker because of readability, sorry, I
don't have the tools I need with me right now.
BR
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Gabriel de la Cruz
gabriel.delac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Jesus, nice hint, Polaris sounds very nice as a brand, but I am afraid
for a while.. even easier if those names
are inclusive, such as indina - openindiana.
BR
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Gabriel de la Cruz
gabriel.delac...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, the gray should be darker because of readability, sorry, I
don't have the tools I need with me right now.
BR
Indiana seems so far away that to me becomes a very exotic name;
FOREIGNERS, PLEASE DON'T LEAVE US ALONE WITH THE DANES!
thats a political statement :-D
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Søren Krarup Olesen wrote:
ALL:
Has there been
I think it is the right time for that kind of questions, as otherwise
it will be too late.
Openindiana is not a totally sexy brand name, ok to go, but...
Indiana was working well as a codename for opensolaris, so it would
work well for example to refer to all the 1.0 releases, or to identify
the
oh indi!
;-D
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Gabriel! gbense...@gmail.com wrote:
OpenIndiana remainds me the opensource version of Indiana Jones.
Maybe we can use him as a pet :P
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Gabriel de la Cruz
gabriel.delac...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is the right
Thats the point,
Convincing, not by knowledge, but with the use of a sales speech.
I am sure they will make more money than sun, but what I mean is that
we wont have as many machines around running solaris at that price...
data centers in big companies, but not so much in the middle range..
Yes
... by the way they broke my heart already, they will need a hell of a
sales man to fix that ;-P
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Gabriel de la Cruz
gabriel.delac...@gmail.com wrote:
Thats the point,
Convincing, not by knowledge, but with the use of a sales speech.
I am sure they will make
alasdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Gabriel de la Cruz
gabriel.delac...@gmail.com wrote:
So, your question is a good one... is that name enough to compete with
them?
I would have no issue recommending OpenIndiana in a board room to a
bunch of pointy-haired-bosses
70 matches
Mail list logo
