On 10/14/13 11:41 AM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 13/10/2013 11:57, Laurent Blume wrote:
On 11/10/2013 18:14, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
This should not happen, this would kill us completely, we have
commercial
applications compiled with Sun Studio, and a lot of software that can't
even be
On 19/10/2013 10:43, Nikola M. wrote:
On 10/14/13 11:41 AM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 13/10/2013 11:57, Laurent Blume wrote:
On 11/10/2013 18:14, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
This should not happen, this would kill us completely, we have
commercial
applications compiled with Sun Studio, and
On 13/10/2013 11:57, Laurent Blume wrote:
On 11/10/2013 18:14, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
This should not happen, this would kill us completely, we have commercial
applications compiled with Sun Studio, and a lot of software that can't
even be compiled with gcc-fortran,
I can't help thinking,
On 11/10/2013 18:14, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
This should not happen, this would kill us completely, we
have commercial applications compiled with Sun Studio, and
a lot of software that can't even be compiled with gcc-fortran,
I can't help thinking, what will happen to you when *Solaris*
On 11/10/13 11:47, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The problem is that this doea not help you with existing binaries and it would
be better if gcc would implement the stable studio interfaces instead it's own
variable interfaces.
Well, a switch is a switch. I've had to think about the issue in
On 11/10/13 14:02, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I am not trying to discuss where it came from but whether it will be stable in
the future.
The last incompatible change was *11 years ago*, and it was a bug fix,
it was not just because they like to break things.
On 11/10/2013 09:39, Nikola M. wrote:
Does this means that Sun Studio / Oracle studio will not be able to run
on Openindiana after this change?
So it is intentional breaking compatibiliy with Studio or including all
software compiled with Studio?
...
I would not like to loose ability to run
