On 02/10/2016 06:14 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hi. I have several notices.
"Some notable features of OpenSolaris were the introduction of the all
familiar GNOME desktop, GNU userland tools, and a new network based
package manager (IPS)"
It seems comma before "and" is not necessary, but I'm
> "At this time, the following distributions are known to support the SPARC
> platform:.."
> I think it would be good to reorganize the list in alphabetic order.
I should have chosen a different name, I always seem to end up last on the
lists :-(
More seriously, I wouldn't necessarily call out
On 02/10/2016 06:14 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hi. I have several notices.
"Some notable features of OpenSolaris were the introduction of the all
familiar GNOME desktop, GNU userland tools, and a new network based
package manager (IPS)"
It seems comma before "and" is not necessary, but I'm
> I need to try inserting an escape character to fix that...the wiki creole
> interpreter somehow thinks it's a link.
>
Use {{{ }}} to avoid formatting. I had the same issue with manpage sections.
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
Hi. I have several notices.
"Some notable features of OpenSolaris were the introduction of the all
familiar GNOME desktop, GNU userland tools, and a new network based
package manager (IPS)"
It seems comma before "and" is not necessary, but I'm not a native speaker.
In Feature/Description
Hi. I have several notices.
>
> "Some notable features of OpenSolaris were the introduction of the all
> familiar GNOME desktop, GNU userland tools, and a new network based package
> manager (IPS)"
> It seems comma before "and" is not necessary, but I'm not a native speaker.
>
Starting an Oxford
Hi,
> Both OpenIndiana and BSD are true unix operating systems, whose roots
> trace back to the original AT Unix.
True
Shortly (I used all theses Unixes (even Edition 7 in the eigthies on a Perkin
Elmer 3220) and all solaris release excepted SunOS 5.1
AT System V -->
On 02/03/2016 04:30 PM, cpforum wrote:
Hi,
Both OpenIndiana and BSD are true unix operating systems, whose roots
trace back to the original AT Unix.
True
Shortly (I used all theses Unixes (even Edition 7 in the eigthies on a Perkin
Elmer 3220) and all solaris release excepted SunOS
On 01/31/2016 03:31 PM, Johan S wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 19:33:24 +0100
Aurélien Larcher wrote:
Hello,
I don t find the comparison useful ... i mean how useful is it ...?
Linux was written from scratch ... by Hp Ibm SGI and lot
of companies .
This is
Michael Kruger писал 31.01.2016 17:17:
On 01/31/2016 01:26 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hi.
Again I don't like "Linux in contrast, was created from scratch to
provide an open source alternative to proprietary Minix". This sounds
strange now, when Minix is open sourced. Perhaps, change it to
On 01/31/2016 01:26 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hi.
Again I don't like "Linux in contrast, was created from scratch to
provide an open source alternative to proprietary Minix". This sounds
strange now, when Minix is open sourced. Perhaps, change it to something
like "to Minix, which license
Hi.
Michael Kruger писал 30.01.2016 21:16:
Hello All,
I have taken the original OpenIndiana FAQ from the website and wiki,
and created an updated draft ready for your review.
You'll find it here: http://hub.openindiana.ninja/?q=content/faq
Please take a few moments to review it and kindly
On 01/30/2016 02:50 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
BTW, can we use echelog to log oi-documentation channel? It also should
be mentioned on the wiki.
Hi Alexander,
I've modified everything you've suggested, and improved a few other
areas as well. Please have another look:
Hi.
Again I don't like "Linux in contrast, was created from scratch to
provide an open source alternative to proprietary Minix". This sounds
strange now, when Minix is open sourced. Perhaps, change it to something
like "to Minix, which license limited it to educational use only".
---
14 matches
Mail list logo