On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 09:34:17PM +0100, Per Sjoholm wrote:
On 12/02/2011 07:44 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:59:48AM -0600, Gary Mills wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a fileserver running oi_151a. How
can I determine the performance improvement from adding log and
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 10:45:42AM +1300, Mark wrote:
On 3/12/2011 9:34 a.m., Per Sjoholm wrote:
On 12/02/2011 07:44 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:59:48AM -0600, Gary Mills wrote:
[...]
To begin, I'm using a single 1 TB SAS disk on the server, without log
or cache devices.
Fwiw, iometer will test all manner of read/write throughput.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Actually, I meant iozone but if iometer is current then it might be
worth looking at as well.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:59:48AM -0600, Gary Mills wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a fileserver running oi_151a. How
can I determine the performance improvement from adding log and cache
devices? I'm using filebench with the fileserver personality. Is
that my best choice? So far,
I'm not sure who nobody is exactly? Given everyone's feedback it
sounds like using filebench and paying close attention to synchronous
write performance is a good way to begin.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Gary Mills gary_mi...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:59:48AM -0600,
On 12/02/2011 07:44 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:59:48AM -0600, Gary Mills wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a fileserver running oi_151a. How
can I determine the performance improvement from adding log and cache
devices? I'm using filebench with the fileserver
On 3/12/2011 9:34 a.m., Per Sjoholm wrote:
On 12/02/2011 07:44 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:59:48AM -0600, Gary Mills wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a fileserver running oi_151a. How
can I determine the performance improvement from adding log and cache
devices? I'm
I'm in the process of setting up a fileserver running oi_151a. How
can I determine the performance improvement from adding log and cache
devices? I'm using filebench with the fileserver personality. Is
that my best choice? So far, I've tried filebench directly on the
server and also on an NFS
I've used filebench on solaris 10 for testing different disk
combinations for a database servers a head of a major purchase. I had
to write my own graphing scripts, but the information was very
informative.
My advice would be to max out your RAM (for ARC) before you bother
with a ZIL, or L2ARC.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Geoff Flarity geoff.flar...@gmail.comwrote:
My advice would be to max out your RAM (for ARC) before you bother
with a ZIL, or L2ARC. Where a fast SSD for a ZIL really shines is
random synchronized writes. IE a database transaction. You'll notice
this when you
On 12/1/2011 3:15 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Geoff Flaritygeoff.flar...@gmail.comwrote:
My advice would be to max out your RAM (for ARC) before you bother
with a ZIL, or L2ARC. Where a fast SSD for a ZIL really shines is
random synchronized writes. IE a database
12 matches
Mail list logo
