Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users

2011-09-28 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Data: 27 settembre 2011 21.33.16 CEST Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users On 27 September 2011 15:52, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: ... When I mount them as NFS4 from the original machine, some of them are translated into nobody, some of them are not. have you

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users

2011-09-28 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
. -- Da: Joshua M. Clulow A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Data: 28 settembre 2011 1.57.46 CEST Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users On 27 July 2011 03:51, David Brodbeck wrote: As far as I know this isn't possible with NFSv4. The NFSv4 spec requires sending

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users

2011-09-27 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
said is true, I should find also cyrus as nobody. Gabriele. -- Da: David Brodbeck A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Data: 26 luglio 2011 19.51.25 CEST Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users

2011-09-27 Thread Joshua M. Clulow
On 27 July 2011 03:51, David Brodbeck bro...@uw.edu wrote: As far as I know this isn't possible with NFSv4.  The NFSv4 spec requires sending names, not uid numbers, over the wire.  If the server and client can't agree on the name, it won't work.  NFSv3 sends uid numbers over the wire, so it

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users

2011-07-26 Thread Alex Smith (K4RNT)
If you don't use a unifying authentication system such as LDAP or NIS+, look up the root_squash and no_root_squash NFS share options. I'm not sure if this will fix your problems, I've used pure NFSv4 most of the time. On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:29, Gabriele Bulfon gbul...@sonicle.com wrote: Hi,

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users

2011-07-26 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
this? -- Da: Alex Smith (K4RNT) A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Data: 26 luglio 2011 16.40.40 CEST Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users If you don't use a unifying authentication system such as LDAP or NIS+, look up the root_squash and no_root_squash NFS share options. I'm not sure

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users

2011-07-26 Thread Ignacio Marambio Catán
this? -- Da: Alex Smith (K4RNT) A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Data: 26 luglio 2011 16.40.40 CEST Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users If you don't use a unifying authentication system such as LDAP

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users

2011-07-26 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users yes, no_root_squash is a linux setting, it is what you achieve with root= in solaris. As far as i know id mapping (uid to uid) was not really necessary in nfs4 because nfs4 uses usernames instead of uids so it's just a matter of having the same users created everywhere

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users

2011-07-26 Thread Alex Smith (K4RNT)
this? -- Da: Alex Smith (K4RNT) A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Data: 26 luglio 2011 16.40.40 CEST Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users If you don't use a unifying authentication system such as LDAP or NIS

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users

2011-07-26 Thread David Brodbeck
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Gabriele Bulfon gbul...@sonicle.comwrote: Hi, is there any way to let NFS4 server not require the same users of the client to exist on the server?? I noticed that the root access on an NFS4 server, let me chmod on any user who's id exists on the server,