On 04/18/21 12:05 PM, Carl Brewer wrote:
Ten years ago a VM was not viable for building OI, but 14 cores and
64 GB of DRAM seems to me likely to handle it. Is an OI VM running
on top of OI viable for building and testing? In particular, how
good is VBox for that? it's become very Windows
On that front, I "must" mention my vboxsvc project:
* https://github.com/jimklimov/vboxsvc
* nee https://sourceforge.net/projects/vboxsvc
Beside allowing to wrap each vbox into an SMF instance (dependencies, restarts
by state monitoring and all), among other features it also has a way to
On April 18, 2021 10:05:02 AM UTC, Carl Brewer wrote:
>
>> Ten years ago a VM was not viable for building OI, but 14 cores and
>64 GB of DRAM seems to me likely to handle it. Is an OI VM running on
>top of OI viable for building and testing? In particular, how good is
>VBox for that? it's
My use cases for VMs are running CAD and EDA software on Win 7 and Debian and
Firefox on Hipster so a local display is essential.
I have no application for a server other than to do backups.
Reg
On Sunday, April 18, 2021, 07:46:22 AM CDT, Carl Brewer
wrote:
On 18/04/2021 9:44 pm,
On 18/04/2021 9:44 pm, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
Running VMs in VirtualBox makes only sense under certain requirements,
like eg. local display. OI has out-of-the-box better virtualization
methods: KVM and BHyve. For both you can create corresponding zones. If
possible, BHyve is the recommended
Am 4/18/21 um 12:05 PM schrieb Carl Brewer:
Ten years ago a VM was not viable for building OI, but 14 cores and
64 GB of DRAM seems to me likely to handle it. Is an OI VM running
on top of OI viable for building and testing? In particular, how
good is VBox for that? it's become very
Ten years ago a VM was not viable for building OI, but 14 cores and 64 GB of
DRAM seems to me likely to handle it. Is an OI VM running on top of OI viable
for building and testing? In particular, how good is VBox for that? it's
become very Windows host oriented. I'm also aware the
I'm not familiar with that as I have never learned python, but I should be
able to create a package for it. I have numerous friends who do use python.
I'd *really* like to get Octave to compile, but they have borked autotools so
badly it is hopeless unless I write a new Makefile. In the
Dear all,
Planning ahead. It would be nice to compile Anaconda for science
sometime in the future.
Regards,
Robert
https://www.ch.cam.ac.uk/computing/software/anaconda-scientific-python-distribution
On 17/04/2021 18:24, Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss wrote:
> I'm about to set
I'm about to set up an HP Z840 with 1x 14 core E5-2690 V4, a 4x 4 TB RAIDZ2
array and 4x 16 GB ECC DIMMs.
The dbx implementation in the Oracle/Sun/Forte compiler suite is the only
debugger I've encountered which will evaluate F77 intrinsics on the command
line. This is immensely valuable to
10 matches
Mail list logo
