On 07/14/13 07:26 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
By the way, do you know what the corporation's legal stance would be
[...]
Nope - I am neither a lawyer nor a corporate spokesman. I have never
read the full Studio license, nor would my interpretation hold much sway
if I had.
Required corporate
On 13/07/2013 9:13 a.m., Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2013-07-12 21:52, Bryan N Iotti wrote:
Thank you all for helping make this clearer.
So, in order to compile something using the same tools that are used to
build /stable, I would use pkg:/developer/sunstudio12u1 while for
hipster I'd use GCC 4.6.3?
On 2013-07-14 02:57, Mark wrote:
The package in the OI does provide some other tools needed for
the build, but not the specific known-to-work-unlike-others
version of the compiler.
Would this be a file called
sunstudio12-patched-ii-2009Sep-sol-x86.tar.bz2 ?
Yes, I believe that should be it.
Hi all,
I keep following the which branch goes where discussion with much
interest.
However, I find I have a hard time understanding a basic problem.
It is mentioned that we are using Sun Studio 12.1 when compiling /dev
and /stable. Are we stuck there and can't use 12.3 for some particular
On 2013-07-12 18:49, Bryan N Iotti wrote:
It is mentioned that we are using Sun Studio 12.1 when compiling /dev
and /stable. Are we stuck there and can't use 12.3 for some particular
reason, like licensing, or is it for compatibility?
I believe, there were attempts to build with SS 12.3 when
On 07/12/13 10:14 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
Possibly, later releases of SS12.3 patches (if publicly available)
fixed the problem - after all, Oracle would be using it to compile
their Solaris, and likely hit similar problems; I am not aware of
anything trying that with illumos.
Yes, we apply
Hi,
On pá, 2013-07-12 at 19:14 +0200, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2013-07-12 18:49, Bryan N Iotti wrote:
It is mentioned that we are using Sun Studio 12.1 when compiling /dev
and /stable. Are we stuck there and can't use 12.3 for some particular
reason, like licensing, or is it for compatibility?
Thank you all for helping make this clearer.
So, in order to compile something using the same tools that are used to
build /stable, I would use pkg:/developer/sunstudio12u1 while for
hipster I'd use GCC 4.6.3?
Where would I find a guide to get started on this? I'm not much of a
programmer
On 2013-07-12 21:52, Bryan N Iotti wrote:
Thank you all for helping make this clearer.
So, in order to compile something using the same tools that are used to
build /stable, I would use pkg:/developer/sunstudio12u1 while for
hipster I'd use GCC 4.6.3?
Unfortunately, no.
There was a specific
Ok, understood.
That basically seems to make for a very high barrier to contribution and
a lot of work for those who actually have access to those compilers in
order to keep everything running.
Thank you for the answers.
Bryan
On 07/12/13 11:13 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2013-07-12 21:52,
On 2013-07-13 00:50, Bryan N Iotti wrote:
Ok, understood.
That basically seems to make for a very high barrier to contribution and
a lot of work for those who actually have access to those compilers in
order to keep everything running.
I guess so, and I guess that's why recent years of
11 matches
Mail list logo
