Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] samba with zfs acls and shadow copies

2013-05-28 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 01:09 AM, Martin Walter wrote: On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:43:41PM +0100, Bayard G. Bell wrote: Was filed as an illumos site issue, where it stayed for much of that time. Generally speaking, just filing bugs and not asking for guidance on what debug would be useful or

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] samba with zfs acls and shadow copies

2013-05-27 Thread Bayard G. Bell
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 11:33 +0200, Martin Walter wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:33:28PM +0200, alka wrote: Why not using Solaris CIFS server? I tried it, but failed. See https://www.illumos.org/issues/1860 from 2011-12-07 . Never got an answer. :-( Was filed as an illumos site issue,

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] samba with zfs acls and shadow copies

2013-05-23 Thread Martin Walter
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:33:28PM +0200, alka wrote: Why not using Solaris CIFS server? I tried it, but failed. See https://www.illumos.org/issues/1860 from 2011-12-07 . Never got an answer. :-( Regards, Martin ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] samba with zfs acls and shadow copies

2013-05-23 Thread Laurent Blume
On 22/05/13 17:50, Martin Walter wrote: please include a new samba version (e.g. 3.6.15) into oi151a8. Best with support for zfs acls and shadow copies. We need it urgently for our fileservers. Thanks and best regards, Martin If it's urgent, maybe you can use the OpenCSW version? I've just

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] samba with zfs acls and shadow copies

2013-05-23 Thread Martin Walter
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:36:17AM +0200, Laurent Blume wrote: On 22/05/13 17:50, Martin Walter wrote: please include a new samba version (e.g. 3.6.15) into oi151a8. Best with support for zfs acls and shadow copies. We need it urgently for our fileservers. If it's urgent, maybe you can use

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] samba with zfs acls and shadow copies

2013-05-23 Thread Laurent Blume
On 23/05/13 12:08, Martin Walter wrote: I will take a look. But I would really prefer to have an *actual* Samba version with ZFS-specific features like ACLs and shadow copies supported by OpenIndiana. Not sure what you mean by «actual» there. Those bits are part of the regular Samba source,

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] samba with zfs acls and shadow copies

2013-05-23 Thread Martin Walter
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 01:50:46PM +0200, Laurent Blume wrote: Not sure what you mean by «actual» there. Those bits are part of the regular Samba source, not OI specific (some might have been contributed by Sun back in the days). sorry, with actual I meant not 3.5.7 as is oi_151a7. = 3.6.14

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] samba with zfs acls and shadow copies

2013-05-23 Thread Laurent Blume
On 23/05/13 14:05, Martin Walter wrote: sorry, with actual I meant not 3.5.7 as is oi_151a7. = 3.6.14 would be great! Ah, right. 3.6.14 is the one in OpenCSW at the moment. I'll add 3.6.15 soon, it seems to build fine at least. If you do try it on OI, please give me some feedback, either

[OpenIndiana-discuss] samba with zfs acls and shadow copies

2013-05-22 Thread Martin Walter
Hi, please include a new samba version (e.g. 3.6.15) into oi151a8. Best with support for zfs acls and shadow copies. We need it urgently for our fileservers. Thanks and best regards, Martin ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] samba with zfs acls and shadow copies

2013-05-22 Thread alka
Why not using Solaris CIFS server? It has a much better Windows integration than SAMBA (Windows SID instead of Unix UID, Windows like ACL, previous version, AD support, shares are manageable via Windows computer management). It is also mostly faster and easier to handle. Only problems I am

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] samba with zfs acls and shadow copies

2013-05-22 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, May 23, 2013 01:33 AM, alka wrote: Why not using Solaris CIFS server? It has a much better Windows integration than SAMBA (Windows SID instead of Unix UID, Windows like ACL, previous version, AD support, shares are manageable via Windows computer management). It is also mostly