On 2012-01-25 21:50, James Carlson wrote:
Robin Axelsson wrote:
I'm confused. If VirtualBox is just going to talk to the physical
interface itself, why is plumbing IP necessary at all? It shouldn't be
needed.
Maybe I'm the one being confused here. I just believed that the IP must
be visible
On 26/01/2012 08:32, Open Indiana wrote:
Please skip the whole ifconfig and plumb this or that discussion.
Virtualbox works on any interface that is plumbed since only then the
interface is visible in the menu.
That is untrue. All interfaces are visible in VB regardless of whether
they are
On 01/27/12 07:51, Robin Axelsson wrote:
On 2012-01-25 21:50, James Carlson wrote:
By default, the first IP layer object created on a given datalink layer
object has the same name as that datalink layer object -- even though
they're distinct ideas. The second and subsequent such objects
On 2012-01-26 09:32, Open Indiana wrote:
Please skip the whole ifconfig and plumb this or that discussion.
Virtualbox works on any interface that is plumbed since only then the
interface is visible in the menu. A working IP-adress is not necessary.
Please put your interfaces on manual
On 2012-01-26 14:05, James Carlson wrote:
Open Indiana wrote:
Please skip the whole ifconfig and plumb this or that discussion.
Virtualbox works on any interface that is plumbed since only then the
interface is visible in the menu.
Oh, yuck. It should be using the libdlpi interfaces (see
on the global zone
before the zone can use it.
Ooops, sorry
-Original Message-
From: Robin Axelsson [mailto:gu99r...@student.chalmers.se]
Sent: vrijdag 27 januari 2012 14:38
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] CIFS performance issues
On 2012-01-26 14:05
On 01/27/12 08:37, Robin Axelsson wrote:
If VirtualBox and OpenIndiana did what they promised without hickups I
wouldn't even need two network interfaces to ensure the operation of the
system. But when bugs occur we try to get around them until they are
fixed, and that requires at least some
On 01/27/12 08:28, Robin Axelsson wrote:
One way to make the system user-friendly is to make nwam automatically
configure IPMP when it detects two properly working ethernet connections
within the same subnet.
My recollection is that automatic configuration of IPMP was on the list
of things to
On 2012-01-27 15:32, James Carlson wrote:
On 01/27/12 08:28, Robin Axelsson wrote:
One way to make the system user-friendly is to make nwam automatically
configure IPMP when it detects two properly working ethernet connections
within the same subnet.
My recollection is that automatic
Robin Axelsson wrote:
On 2012-01-27 15:32, James Carlson wrote:
What NWAM is supposed to do is configure only one usable interface
(guided by user selection criteria) for the system. The fact that you
got multiple interfaces configured is indeed an anomaly, and one I can't
explain. I don't
On 2012-01-27 16:45, James Carlson wrote:
Robin Axelsson wrote:
On 2012-01-27 15:32, James Carlson wrote:
What NWAM is supposed to do is configure only one usable interface
(guided by user selection criteria) for the system. The fact that you
got multiple interfaces configured is indeed an
Robin Axelsson wrote:
On 2012-01-27 16:45, James Carlson wrote:
Robin Axelsson wrote:
On 2012-01-27 15:32, James Carlson wrote:
What NWAM is supposed to do is configure only one usable interface
(guided by user selection criteria) for the system. The fact that you
got multiple interfaces
Please skip the whole ifconfig and plumb this or that discussion.
Virtualbox works on any interface that is plumbed since only then the
interface is visible in the menu. A working IP-adress is not necessary.
Please put your interfaces on manual IP-assignment and disable nwam.
Give an IP-address
Open Indiana wrote:
Please skip the whole ifconfig and plumb this or that discussion.
Virtualbox works on any interface that is plumbed since only then the
interface is visible in the menu.
Oh, yuck. It should be using the libdlpi interfaces (see
dlpi_walk(3DLPI)), at least on OpenIndiana.
On 2012-01-24 21:59, James Carlson wrote:
Robin Axelsson wrote:
If you have two interfaces inside the same zone that have the same IP
prefix, then you have to have IPMP configured, or all bets are off.
Maybe it'll work. But probably not. And was never been supported that
way by Sun.
The idea
Robin Axelsson wrote:
On 2012-01-24 21:59, James Carlson wrote:
Well, unless you get into playing tricks with IP Filter. And if you do
that, then you're in a much deeper world of hurt, at least in terms of
performance.
Here's what the virtualbox manul says about bridged networking:
On 2012-01-25 19:03, James Carlson wrote:
Robin Axelsson wrote:
On 2012-01-24 21:59, James Carlson wrote:
Well, unless you get into playing tricks with IP Filter. And if you do
that, then you're in a much deeper world of hurt, at least in terms of
performance.
Here's what the virtualbox
Robin Axelsson wrote:
I'm confused. If VirtualBox is just going to talk to the physical
interface itself, why is plumbing IP necessary at all? It shouldn't be
needed.
Maybe I'm the one being confused here. I just believed that the IP must
be visible to the host for VirtualBox to be able
:
What happens if you disable nwam and use the basic/manual ifconfig setup?
-Original Message-
From: Robin Axelsson [mailto:gu99r...@student.chalmers.se]
Sent: maandag 23 januari 2012 15:10
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] CIFS performance issues
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:39:42PM +0100, Robin Axelsson wrote:
ifconfig -a returns:
...
e1000g1: flags=1004843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4 mtu
1500 index 2
inet 10.40.137.185 netmask ff00 broadcast 10.40.137.255
e1000g2:
On 2012-01-24 16:52, Gary Mills wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:39:42PM +0100, Robin Axelsson wrote:
ifconfig -a returns:
...
e1000g1: flags=1004843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4 mtu
1500 index 2
inet 10.40.137.185 netmask ff00 broadcast 10.40.137.255
e1000g2:
Robin Axelsson wrote:
On 2012-01-24 16:52, Gary Mills wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:39:42PM +0100, Robin Axelsson wrote:
ifconfig -a returns:
...
e1000g1: flags=1004843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4 mtu
1500 index 2
inet 10.40.137.185 netmask ff00 broadcast
On 2012-01-24 19:14, James Carlson wrote:
Robin Axelsson wrote:
On 2012-01-24 16:52, Gary Mills wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:39:42PM +0100, Robin Axelsson wrote:
ifconfig -a returns:
...
e1000g1: flags=1004843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4mtu
1500 index 2
inet
Robin Axelsson wrote:
If you have two interfaces inside the same zone that have the same IP
prefix, then you have to have IPMP configured, or all bets are off.
Maybe it'll work. But probably not. And was never been supported that
way by Sun.
The idea I have with using two NICs is to create
: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] CIFS performance issues
No, I'm not doing anything in particular in the virtual machine. The media
file is played on another computer in the (physical) network over CIFS.
Over
the network I also access the server using Remote Desktop/Terminal Services
to communicate
are you using?
-Original Message-
From: Robin Axelsson [mailto:gu99r...@student.chalmers.se]
Sent: zondag 22 januari 2012 23:38
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] CIFS performance issues
I don't understand what you mean with PCI-x settings and where
?
What soundcard are you using?
-Original Message-
From: Robin Axelsson [mailto:gu99r...@student.chalmers.se]
Sent: zondag 22 januari 2012 23:38
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] CIFS performance issues
I don't understand what you mean with PCI-x
What happens if you disable nwam and use the basic/manual ifconfig setup?
-Original Message-
From: Robin Axelsson [mailto:gu99r...@student.chalmers.se]
Sent: maandag 23 januari 2012 15:10
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] CIFS performance issues
A very stupid answer, but have you looked at the bios and inspected the
settings of the network devices and /or PCIx ? How is your bios setup (AHCI
or raid or ??) ?
Do you see any error in the system logs?
To my opinion your system swallows in the datatransfers. Either on the
NIC-montherboard
I don't understand what you mean with PCI-x settings and where to check
them out. The hardware is not PCI-X, it is PCIe. The affected LSI HBA is
a discrete PCIe card that operates in IT-mode. As in system logs I
assume you mean /var/adm/messages and I could not find anything there.
If this
30 matches
Mail list logo
