Here is a review i just found o none of our main IT sites in Holland:
http://tweakers.net/benchdb/testcombo/2662
-Original Message-
From: Jason Matthews [mailto:ja...@broken.net]
Sent: donderdag 5 januari 2012 18:39
To: 'Discussion list for OpenIndiana'
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss]
I have a rather stupid question i guess..
The following is the case
1. I have a 100GB iscsi target created at my homeserver within OpeinIndiana
2. the zfs drive has lzo compression enabled
3. I have OpenVPN running on this homeserver
4. I have connected my laptop via OpenVPN to my homeserver
5.
what is the 440Mb file that you've transferred? is it easily compressed?
On 6 January 2012 10:51, Open Indiana openindi...@out-side.nl wrote:
I have a rather stupid question i guess..
The following is the case
1. I have a 100GB iscsi target created at my homeserver within OpeinIndiana
2. the
I used for testing the solaris 11 ISO. It is 440MB.
(sol-11--text-x86.iso)
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Adams [mailto:t12nsloo...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 6 januari 2012 12:25
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] (probably) Stupid question
I just did a new save on the disk with 2 iso's . it was the
compressionration on the solaris iso, since the second file was an Ubuntu
iso and when windows reached that file transfer dropped to 3,8MB/s. ( at
writing it declined to 1 MB/s)
The other end is a cablemodem at 30/3 Mb/s
So it was the
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
Inviato da iPad
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
On 6/01/12 10:22 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
2003 called, they want their conspiracy theory back.
James C. McPherson
--
Solaris kernel software engineer, system admin and troubleshooter
Thanks Jason.
That is actually what I was looking at.
HP D2600 disk box, with Procurve DL380 G7 and buy somewhere else the LSI
SAS 9205-8e HBA
I called our HP reseller and the asked about the D2600 box, it's about
$5000 with tax (as the currency is now).
I strongly advise not using the P410
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
What's the source of this rumor?
--
Finid
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
On 01/06/2012 01:22 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
Sources please, because from where I'm standing, it looks like you're
just making this stuff up.
Cheers,
--
Saso
On Jan 6, 2012, at 9:59 AM, LinuxBSDos.com wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
What's the source of this rumor?
And moreover, how would anyone here know if such a rumor were true? This is not
an Oracle-sponsored project.
Also,
On 01/06/12 04:22, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
No. Oracle makes lots of money selling Exadata storage appliance
systems running Solaris on x64 hardware.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-
This has been a rumor since acquisition of sun... i wouldn't worry about
it. i would guess that in the highest rooms of the oracle building all
ideas have gone across the table.
lk
On 1/6/12 6:22 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of
Hi all
Some time back, perhaps 2-3 years ago, I first heard someone mention Block
pointer rewrite (BPR) and what could be done with that. Is it, from the Illumos
developers point of view, likely that this will ever see the day? As far as I
can understand, S11 doesn't have this, but I thought I
Sorry mate,
but i think this is pure nonsense and fud too.
Who told you this?
Would be quit interesting to know about the source.
Why should Oracle do this?
To sell more Sparc Systems?
Nobody of the Customer Base will buy more Sparc Systems in case of EOL'd
x86 Solaris
Cheers
Bernd
On
Please note that although we all thought it was FUD; Alan Coopersmith
(notice his email address) who works for Oracle (but still thankfully
watches these forums) has already responded to this in the negative,
and hasn't included any of the usual caveats about it being a
different department.
I
On 01/06/12 09:23, Jonathan Adams wrote:
Please note that although we all thought it was FUD; Alan Coopersmith
(notice his email address) who works for Oracle
But as I note here every few months, please remember I am not an authorized
Oracle spokesman, and what I say is not an ironclad
From Solaris 11 releases notes : Solaris 11 no longer support x86 (32 bit) but
support x64 (64 bit Intel).
Message du 06/01/12 18:31
De : Alan Coopersmith
A : Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Oracle Solaris on x86 going to be killed?
On
On 01/06/2012 07:22 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
They did say they'd get rid of the 32-bit versions of Solaris, so that's
probably what you're referring to, as well as remove support for older
SPARCs, which
On 01/06/12 04:22, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
Inviato da iPad
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
On 1/6/12 4:30 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 01/06/12 04:22, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of
Solaris...
Is this true?!
Inviato da iPad
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
We are planning on hosting a meetup at fosdem. If anyone is interested
please let me know.. trying to get a rough headcount before we find
someplace to hold it.
--
Linda Kateley
Global Evangelist and Community Manager
(mobile) 612-807-6349
(email) linda.kate...@nexenta.com
(skype) lkateley
Well, if someone would make use of those files that Oracle shared in
bittorrent, we could make S11 upgreadable to OI, so no one would loose any
server if Orcale goes nuts and kills architectures... That would be a very
important task.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Shain Singh
Goes nuts? That would imply that the starting point wasn't currently
nuts wouldn't it? ;-)
On 1/6/12 4:37 PM, Gabriel de la Cruz gabriel.delac...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, if someone would make use of those files that Oracle shared in
bittorrent, we could make S11 upgreadable to OI, so no one
On 01/ 7/12 01:37 PM, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
Well, if someone would make use of those files that Oracle shared in
bittorrent, we could make S11 upgreadable to OI, so no one would loose any
server if Orcale goes nuts and kills architectures... That would be a very
important task.
Ok, the sources were voices from some Oracle Italy guy who told a friend of
mine that the higher plans of Oracle were to kill Oracle Intel in a couple of
years and stick to just sparc...
I didn't believe that, but was still guessing if there may be any hidden truth
leading somwhere.
I also
On Jan 6, 2012, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
Well, if someone would make use of those files that Oracle shared in
BitTorrent
1. It's not a legit release and therefore a legal grey area
2. We don't know who released it but either way see #1
3. It's most likely that Solaris 11 changes are spread
Hi everyone:
We're facing some problems with Belenix website hosting, and I'm
looking for options.
Does anyone know of any web site hosting based on openindiana ?
-- Sriram
Belenix: www.belenix.org
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
So What's the story with the smb dtrace providers as documented in Solaris?
Seems like a relevant bug: https://www.illumos.org/issues/1841
Thanks,
-Roman
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
29 matches
Mail list logo
