A somewhat dated report, in a completely different environment, but
still seems to strike some similarities that look right:
http://java.net/jira/browse/UPDATECENTER2-1697?focusedCommentId=62748page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_62748
I'll try and
After a lot of time spent troubleshooting, only to see the crashes become
more frequent, I ended up having to reinstall... This time I'm starting
from the 151a3 disk, not the 148 one, and I'll avoid setting esoteric paths
and the like (after all, I kind of know where the software I need is and I
Am 08.05.2012 20:31, schrieb Andrew Gabriel:
I normally do:
zlogin myzone init 5
Solaris 11 has zone shutdown to do this.
I don't recall if that was added before or after the fork.
This subcommand seems to be added after the fork.
It isn't supported by zoneadm in oi_151a4.
Found some more on this:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13334
and,
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=1831680group_id=28236atid=392777
Since there seems to be an easy work-around (by wrapping the passed
url with a str() call), I'll have a go with that.
(I do have
OK, I said I wasn't going to dig into the source, but since I found
such an easy and specific fix, I had a go with it... and it WORKS! yay
:)
root@ganesha:/usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/client/transport#
pkg history
STARTOPERATIONCLIENT
And again,
running pkg update, I had to patch the headerlist too... I cherry
picked what I could see from the workaround attached to
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12713
Here's my complete diff:
kaos@ganesha:/usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/client/transport$
diff
Hi all,
The reinstall went smoothly, but upon reinstall, fmd started to complain
about problems with the only PCI Express x16 slot (slot 2) that holds the
video card.
It is littering the error log with reports of problems with the pci fabric
and it freezes up shortly thereafter. Before the
Would BTRFS be a viable FS for Openindiana?
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
Would BTRFS be a viable FS for Openindiana?
I would be interested to know what feature(s) of it you want that you
think are missing from OI?
--
Andrew
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
To answer my own question, I have finally solved the issue proper (I hope).
Turns out that in the BIOS there was a feature I knew nothing about, and
HP never mentions.
Turn off PCI SERR# Generation and all the fabric issues vanish.
Hope this helps someone avoid the HELL it was to try and do
WHY ?
You have the great ZFS, among other goodies.
Paolo
On 05/09/12 12:06, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
Would BTRFS be a viable FS for Openindiana?
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Would BTRFS be a viable FS for Openindiana?
btrfs is licensed under GPL, OpenIndiana mostly under CDDL, so that's a hard
nut to crack. The harder one is still who wants btrfs when you've got ZFS
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
r...@karlsbakk.net
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Would BTRFS be a viable FS for Openindiana?
btrfs is licensed under GPL, OpenIndiana mostly under CDDL, so that's a hard
nut to crack. The harder one is still who wants btrfs when you've got ZFS
One good reason to do it would be to help users migrate from Linux
I was a bit surprised to see so much near-religious reactions
James C is to be commended for his rational answer.
I was merely trying to find out if
A: BTRFS would be (easily) doable
B: BTRFS had any advantage at all, at least down the line, years away.
C: ZFS had any major wins over BTRFS
Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
I was a bit surprised to see so much near-religious reactions
James C is to be commended for his rational answer.
Thanks. ;-}
Really, it doesn't surprise me too much.
I was merely trying to find out if
A: BTRFS would be (easily) doable
Doable, almost
2012-05-09 5:13, Martin Frost wrote:
I'm trying to export a ZFS filesystem on oi_148 via NFS, but the NFS
mount fails. The same ZFS filesystem is shared via CIFS, and that's
working. I hope CIFS sharing doesn't interfere with NFS exporting.
Does your nfsserver's dmesg (/var/adm/messages) log
2012-05-09 11:58, Uwe Reh написал:
Am 08.05.2012 20:31, schrieb Andrew Gabriel:
I normally do:
zlogin myzone init 5
Solaris 11 has zone shutdown to do this.
I don't recall if that was added before or after the fork.
This subcommand seems to be added after the fork.
It isn't supported by
For foreign data access alone, and not boot or extreme performance, surely a
fuse-based implementation would work, avoid even the appearance of license
issues, and of course be much quicker and easier to debug.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
James Carlson wrote:
Each currently has advantages over the other in different departments.
On balance, from what I've seen of BTRFS in Fedora, ZFS has much more
over BTRFS than the reverse. But that's to be expected; ZFS is much
more mature.
Frankly, I don't expect that to be a useful
I think BTRFS on openindiana would be a distraction and not worth the effort
at this point in time.
At home I and trialling ZFS on linux (need linux for mythtv) and it works
well.
I have not tried BTRFS but there a few things I really like about ZFS and
openindiana.
1.) The kernel cifs server
I was wrong on that, they went away for a couple of hours and then we
were back to square one.
I followed instructions on
http://www.mail-archive.com/fm-discuss@opensolaris.org/msg00298.html
and added
pcie_ce_mask=-1;
to both the nvidia.conf file and the pcieb.conf in /kernel/drv.
The
On 05/09/2012 06:24 AM, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
Would BTRFS be a viable FS for Openindiana?
I would be interested to know what feature(s) of it you want that you
think are missing from OI?
I'm in favor of supporting all file systems (HFS+, NTFS, ext4, jfs, ffs,
etc.).
W dniu 2012-05-09 19:08, Ray Arachelian pisze:
On 05/09/2012 06:24 AM, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
Would BTRFS be a viable FS for Openindiana?
I would be interested to know what feature(s) of it you want that you
think are missing from OI?
I'm in favor of supporting all
Hi,
After a long time, Apache Software Fondation published yesterday OpenOffice 3.4.
Solaris/OpenIndiana binaries are not available yet ! (same for LibreOffice).
Yet or never ?
Who knows ASF plans for Solaris11/Openindiana Aoo binaries ?
http://www.openoffice.org/news/aoo34.html
Same question I had today... good thing I found a link to OOo 3.3 via the
internet archive.
Bryqn
On May 9, 2012 10:13 PM, cpforum cpfo...@orange.fr wrote:
Hi,
After a long time, Apache Software Fondation published yesterday
OpenOffice 3.4.
Solaris/OpenIndiana binaries are not available
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:12 PM, cpforum cpfo...@orange.fr wrote:
After a long time, Apache Software Fondation published yesterday OpenOffice
3.4.
Solaris/OpenIndiana binaries are not available yet ! (same for LibreOffice).
[...]
Who knows ASF plans for Solaris11/Openindiana Aoo binaries
Hi,
somebody built Aoo 3.4 beta few months back for Solaris/x86 (it was
published on Apache web). So it is doable, it only needs somebody to do
that.
Best regards,
Milan
cpforum píše v st 09. 05. 2012 v 22:12 +0200:
Hi,
After a long time, Apache Software Fondation published yesterday
On Wed, 9 May 2012, Jan Owoc wrote:
Who knows ASF plans for Solaris11/Openindiana Aoo binaries ?
There was an extensive discussion on this list in January [1] about
renewing a Solaris/OpenIndiana build of LibreOffice. Why do you want
OpenOffice specifically?
The correct approach is for
In January, I got quite a way through the compilation procedure for
LibreOffice (using gcc) but got stuck compiling the dictionaries, with
possible errors in gcc causing some trouble,
I re-got the code from git last month, and the newer version of the
code now compiles the dictionaries, but I
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 18:38:54 +0400
From: Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru
2012-05-09 5:13, Martin Frost wrote:
I'm trying to export a ZFS filesystem on oi_148 via NFS, but the NFS
mount fails. The same ZFS filesystem is shared via CIFS, and that's
working. I hope CIFS sharing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apparently it is imminent:
http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16p=234391
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (SunOS)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
31 matches
Mail list logo
