On 07/04/2012 01:57 PM, Open Indiana wrote:
I must be blind or stupid and maybe both are be true.
But where the h do I find the MAC-address of my zone's IP-address?
(in-nonglobal-zone)# ifconfig vnic0
vnic0: flags=201000843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,CoS mtu 1500
index 2
inet
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Sašo Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/04/2012 01:57 PM, Open Indiana wrote:
I must be blind or stupid and maybe both are be true.
But where the h do I find the MAC-address of my zone's IP-address?
(in-nonglobal-zone)# ifconfig vnic0
vnic0:
I followed the directions in the Wiki. So, I used the legacy publisher to
upgrade from snv111 to snv134 first. Then I made legacy non-sticky and
added dev as the preferred.
Mark
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Jonathan Adams t12nsloo...@gmail.comwrote:
from the publisher information you
I had the issue with Thunderbird originally ... I just uninstalled
it did the upgrade then re-installed it.
but that was only 1 package.
what packages are conflicting?
On 4 July 2012 14:55, M Lubratt mplubr...@gmail.com wrote:
I just found and followed the Troubleshooting image-update failures
On 07/03/2012 07:27 AM, James Carlson wrote:
The 82579V should use the e1000g driver, but will need updates for the
new chipset. (It did need updates on Linux, so the failure to attach
reported here is not surprising.) An alternative might be the 'em'
driver from Masayuki Murayama.
See:
On 7/4/2012 6:37 PM, Glenn Holmer wrote:
On 07/03/2012 07:27 AM, James Carlson wrote:
The 82579V should use the e1000g driver, but will need updates for the
new chipset. (It did need updates on Linux, so the failure to attach
reported here is not surprising.) An alternative might be the 'em'
I downloaded a PDF on the new zfs feature flag stuff. I'm not sure what
5000 means, but I'm not worried now. I don't think I'll upgrade the data
pool yet though.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Swartzendruber [mailto:dswa...@druber.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 9:41 PM
To:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Dan Swartzendruber dswa...@druber.com wrote:
I downloaded a PDF on the new zfs feature flag stuff. I'm not sure what
5000 means, but I'm not worried now. I don't think I'll upgrade the data
pool yet though.
5000 is an arbitrarily high number, to provide
Okay, thanks. Is there a reason the pool version is not in the property
anymore? That's a bit confusing :(
-Original Message-
From: Richard Lowe [mailto:richl...@richlowe.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 9:55 PM
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss]
