[OpenIndiana-discuss] Fw: [solarisx86] ZFS and encryption

2013-03-26 Thread Apostolos Syropoulos


Speaking of full disk encryption and ZFS this article might raise an eyebrow.

http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/FreeNAS-8-3-1-introduces-full-disk-ZFS-encryption-1827206.html






--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Fw: [solarisx86] ZFS and encryption

2013-03-26 Thread paolo marcheschi

That's very interesting !
Do you think is it possible to integrate it also in Openindiana ?

Paolo
On 03/26/13 09:33, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:

Speaking of full disk encryption and ZFS this article might raise an eyebrow.

http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/FreeNAS-8-3-1-introduces-full-disk-ZFS-encryption-1827206.html








___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Yubico on OpenIndiana

2013-03-26 Thread James Relph
Hi all,

I've managed to get a YubiKey ( http://www.yubico.com ) working on Oi151a7 
(follow up post on that shortly) but I just wondered if anyone knew if it was 
possible to use that with the build in SSH service, or if it does require 
OpenSSH installing?  I've got to the point where it asks for the YubiKey OTP 
(and seems to accept it) on login over SSH, but when it asks for the user 
password after that it then just goes round in circles for a bit asking for a 
new OTP and then the password again.  The examples I've seen on similar systems 
(SmartOS for example - 
http://blogs.everycity.co.uk/alasdair/2013/01/two-factor-ssh-authentication-with-yubico-yubikeys-on-smartos/
 ) use OpenSSH but I wasn't sure if that was via choice or necessity?

Thanks,

James

Principal Consultant

Website:www.themacplace.co.uk
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Library/tool updates

2013-03-26 Thread James Relph
Hi all,

I am going to stick a wiki page up explaining the process involved in getting 
the YubiKey software installed, and I just wondered about how much I had needed 
to update/install to get it working.  In terms of software other than the 
YubiKey software I needed to put on new versions of autoconf and automake, as 
well as install libtool.  The versions that were on seemed relatively 
out-of-date, yet the newest releases built absolutely fine.  Is the bug 
reporting mechanism the right way to recommend updates to these tools/libraries?

Thanks,

James

Principal Consultant

Website:www.themacplace.co.uk
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Yubico on OpenIndiana

2013-03-26 Thread James Relph
Talking to myself here, but the answer is no, it doesn't need OpenSSH.  It 
works fine with the built-in SSH server.  I was having a few problems getting 
it working but tracked it down to a typo in the yubikey_mappings file.  Works a 
treat!

Thanks,

James.

On 26 Mar 2013, at 09:56, James Relph ja...@themacplace.co.uk wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 I've managed to get a YubiKey ( http://www.yubico.com ) working on Oi151a7 
 (follow up post on that shortly) but I just wondered if anyone knew if it was 
 possible to use that with the build in SSH service, or if it does require 
 OpenSSH installing?  I've got to the point where it asks for the YubiKey OTP 
 (and seems to accept it) on login over SSH, but when it asks for the user 
 password after that it then just goes round in circles for a bit asking for a 
 new OTP and then the password again.  The examples I've seen on similar 
 systems (SmartOS for example - 
 http://blogs.everycity.co.uk/alasdair/2013/01/two-factor-ssh-authentication-with-yubico-yubikeys-on-smartos/
  ) use OpenSSH but I wasn't sure if that was via choice or necessity?
 
 Thanks,
 
 James
 
 Principal Consultant
 
 Website:  www.themacplace.co.uk
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana-discuss Digest, Vol 32, Issue 62

2013-03-26 Thread Luca De Pandis
Unless i'm mistaken, Illumos/OI is already able to use full disk encryption
by

using lofiadm.


This is not a very ZFS on-disk encryption, but a block device encryption
with

a ZFS pool created on top of that.

So, if Illumos/Linux/BSD has a block device encryption support (lofiadm,
GELI

and LUKS provide that) you can create a ZFS pool on top of an encrypted

device.



Best regards,

Luca De Pandis




On 03/26/13 10:07, paolo marcheschi wrote:

 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:07:15 +0100

 From: paolo marcheschi paolo.marches...@ftgm.it

  That's very interesting !

 Do you think is it possible to integrate it also in Openindiana ?



 Paolo



 On 03/26/13 09:33, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:

  Speaking of full disk encryption and ZFS this article might raise an

  eyebrow.

 

 
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/FreeNAS-8-3-1-introduces-full-disk

  -ZFS-encryption-1827206.html
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] SMF retries count

2013-03-26 Thread Jim Klimov

Hello all,

  I have a GlassFish app-server server with lots of classes which
takes quite long to properly shut down. It has self-registered
with SMF as a service instance (domain1), and that includes no
forced timeout for starts and stops (value is 0), but the method
script somehow enforces a 60-second timeout.

  So during an svcadm restart, the service tries 3 times, for a
minute each, and fails. Upon the third failure, it is marked as in
maintenance and the restart is not attempted. The actual appserver
completes its shutdown properly some time after this.

  The question regarding SMF is whether I can increase the number
of non-instant but consequent failures that it can tolerate (for a
transient service) from 3 to a higher value?

  Alternately, does someone know where to bump the timeout for
GlassFish stop-domain action? ;)

Thanks,
//Jim

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SMF retries count

2013-03-26 Thread Jim Klimov

On 2013-03-26 14:09, Michael Stapleton wrote:

Hi Jim,

Your SMF method is likely running asadmin.

Have you tried using the asadmin command directly to stop the domain?
It sounds like it could be the default 60 second socket timeout when
asadmin attempts to contact glassfish.
Network issues? Glassfish already down?



Yes, the default SMF integration of glassfish invokes asadmin with
such actions as start-domain and stop-domain. I do want to have it
managed by SMF since that's catered for, and these actions to seem
to include a timeout (60s for stop, 600s for start), both of which
are exceeded in this instance; I am looking into GlassFish code now
to see if these two timeouts are hard-coded or configurable (aren't
according to the docs).

From what I gather, when these 60 or 600 seconds elapse, the admin
CLI verifies the server state. If it was stopping but still runs,
or if it was starting but still doesn't accept connections, the
asadmin program (a java class, ultimately) returns a non-zero exit
code. Thus the SMF method fails (despite configured lack of SMF's
own timeouts), even though the server happily starts or stops a
few minutes past the existing asadmin timeout.

I am inclined to think this is poor programming on glassfish side,
but wonder what I can do to properly host and manage the appserver
via SMF.

PS: If I use asadmin directly, i.e. to restart the appserver, while
SMF is also enabled, the death of a java process causes SMF to start
it up again - and my manual invokation of restart also starts it.
So the two java processes competing for same ports come into conflict.

//Jim


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SMF retries count

2013-03-26 Thread Michael Stapleton
There are a number of environmental variables used by asadmin, but I did
not find anything that looked promising.

As a last resort hack, you could you wrap the asadmin command in a
script.
I would also try to find out why my app takes over 60 seconds to stop.
We might be trying to cure the symptom.

Mike

On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 14:26 +0100, Jim Klimov wrote:

 On 2013-03-26 14:09, Michael Stapleton wrote:
  Hi Jim,
 
  Your SMF method is likely running asadmin.
 
  Have you tried using the asadmin command directly to stop the domain?
  It sounds like it could be the default 60 second socket timeout when
  asadmin attempts to contact glassfish.
  Network issues? Glassfish already down?
 
 
 Yes, the default SMF integration of glassfish invokes asadmin with
 such actions as start-domain and stop-domain. I do want to have it
 managed by SMF since that's catered for, and these actions to seem
 to include a timeout (60s for stop, 600s for start), both of which
 are exceeded in this instance; I am looking into GlassFish code now
 to see if these two timeouts are hard-coded or configurable (aren't
 according to the docs).
 
  From what I gather, when these 60 or 600 seconds elapse, the admin
 CLI verifies the server state. If it was stopping but still runs,
 or if it was starting but still doesn't accept connections, the
 asadmin program (a java class, ultimately) returns a non-zero exit
 code. Thus the SMF method fails (despite configured lack of SMF's
 own timeouts), even though the server happily starts or stops a
 few minutes past the existing asadmin timeout.
 
 I am inclined to think this is poor programming on glassfish side,
 but wonder what I can do to properly host and manage the appserver
 via SMF.
 
 PS: If I use asadmin directly, i.e. to restart the appserver, while
 SMF is also enabled, the death of a java process causes SMF to start
 it up again - and my manual invokation of restart also starts it.
 So the two java processes competing for same ports come into conflict.
 
 //Jim
 
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SMF retries count

2013-03-26 Thread Jim Klimov

On 2013-03-26 14:44, Michael Stapleton wrote:

There are a number of environmental variables used by asadmin, but I did
not find anything that looked promising.

As a last resort hack, you could you wrap the asadmin command in a
script.


I thought of changing the SMF method to something like
  while ! asadmin ... ; do sleep 1; done
(perhaps with my arbitrarily-picked timeout, like running 10 loops
max), but this would be prone to any number of other unforeseen
errors causing the failure exit code - and that event should be
detected/reported rather than ignored in this manner.


I would also try to find out why my app takes over 60 seconds to stop.
We might be trying to cure the symptom.


Well, there are no particular errors in the log, just zillions of
closing, unregistering, unhooking stuff. No erroneous stacktrace,
no real hiccups like a minute of silence. Simply a lot of work to
stop the portal properly. That part we don't really find unusual.

Thanks for commiserating with me on this ;)
///Jim

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SMF retries count

2013-03-26 Thread Jim Klimov

Well, regarding the glassfish part of the problem, the 60sec timeout
is hardcoded unconfigurable in the admin-cli part of the project.

http://java.net/projects/glassfish/sources/svn/content/tags/3.1.1-b12/admin/cli/src/main/java/com/sun/enterprise/admin/cli/StopDomainCommand.java?rev=60828

Grep for WAIT_FOR_DAS_TIME_MS if interested.

Likewise, the start timeout is specified as well somewhere in the code:

http://java.net/projects/glassfish/sources/svn/content/tags/3.1.1-b12/admin/cli/src/main/java/com/sun/enterprise/admin/cli/StartServerHelper.java?rev=60828

import static 
com.sun.enterprise.admin.cli.CLIConstants.WAIT_FOR_DAS_TIME_MS;


I see that the start method also goes into maintenance for us (exceeding
the 600sec timeout), but the JVM stays alive and ultimately starts up.


I guess the solution here would be to wrap the stop/startup into a
script which would monitor the logs for I'm started/dead kind of
message and the JVM process aliveness and only exit then. Been
there, done that for Tomcat and JBOSS... Just one more plugin to
add into another mega-script of mine ;)

Now, if there are things I might do on SMF's side (like the question
I came with originally - increase number of retries), I'd still be
interested to know! ;)

Thanks for discussion,
//Jim

On 2013-03-26 14:26, Jim Klimov wrote:

On 2013-03-26 14:09, Michael Stapleton wrote:

Hi Jim,

Your SMF method is likely running asadmin.

Have you tried using the asadmin command directly to stop the domain?
It sounds like it could be the default 60 second socket timeout when
asadmin attempts to contact glassfish.
Network issues? Glassfish already down?



Yes, the default SMF integration of glassfish invokes asadmin with
such actions as start-domain and stop-domain. I do want to have it
managed by SMF since that's catered for, and these actions to seem
to include a timeout (60s for stop, 600s for start), both of which
are exceeded in this instance; I am looking into GlassFish code now
to see if these two timeouts are hard-coded or configurable (aren't
according to the docs).

 From what I gather, when these 60 or 600 seconds elapse, the admin
CLI verifies the server state. If it was stopping but still runs,
or if it was starting but still doesn't accept connections, the
asadmin program (a java class, ultimately) returns a non-zero exit
code. Thus the SMF method fails (despite configured lack of SMF's
own timeouts), even though the server happily starts or stops a
few minutes past the existing asadmin timeout.

I am inclined to think this is poor programming on glassfish side,
but wonder what I can do to properly host and manage the appserver
via SMF.

PS: If I use asadmin directly, i.e. to restart the appserver, while
SMF is also enabled, the death of a java process causes SMF to start
it up again - and my manual invokation of restart also starts it.
So the two java processes competing for same ports come into conflict.


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SMF retries count

2013-03-26 Thread Michael Stapleton
Could these be of use?


startd/critical_failure_count
startd/critical_failure_period

 The critical_failure_count  and  critical_failure_period
 properties  together  specify the maximum number of ser-
 vice failures allowed in a given  time  interval  before
 svc.startd  transitions  the service to maintenance.  If
 the number of failures exceeds critical_failure_count in
 anyperiodof   critical_failure_period   seconds,
 svc.startd will transition the service to maintenance.



Mike

On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 15:52 +0100, Jim Klimov wrote:

 On 2013-03-26 14:44, Michael Stapleton wrote:
  There are a number of environmental variables used by asadmin, but I did
  not find anything that looked promising.
 
  As a last resort hack, you could you wrap the asadmin command in a
  script.
 
 I thought of changing the SMF method to something like
while ! asadmin ... ; do sleep 1; done
 (perhaps with my arbitrarily-picked timeout, like running 10 loops
 max), but this would be prone to any number of other unforeseen
 errors causing the failure exit code - and that event should be
 detected/reported rather than ignored in this manner.
 
  I would also try to find out why my app takes over 60 seconds to stop.
  We might be trying to cure the symptom.
 
 Well, there are no particular errors in the log, just zillions of
 closing, unregistering, unhooking stuff. No erroneous stacktrace,
 no real hiccups like a minute of silence. Simply a lot of work to
 stop the portal properly. That part we don't really find unusual.
 
 Thanks for commiserating with me on this ;)
 ///Jim
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SMF retries count

2013-03-26 Thread dormitionsk...@hotmail.com
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:

 Well, regarding the glassfish part of the problem, the 60sec timeout
 is hardcoded unconfigurable in the admin-cli part of the project.
 
 http://java.net/projects/glassfish/sources/svn/content/tags/3.1.1-b12/admin/cli/src/main/java/com/sun/enterprise/admin/cli/StopDomainCommand.java?rev=60828
 
 Grep for WAIT_FOR_DAS_TIME_MS if interested.
 
 Likewise, the start timeout is specified as well somewhere in the code:
 
 http://java.net/projects/glassfish/sources/svn/content/tags/3.1.1-b12/admin/cli/src/main/java/com/sun/enterprise/admin/cli/StartServerHelper.java?rev=60828
 
 import static com.sun.enterprise.admin.cli.CLIConstants.WAIT_FOR_DAS_TIME_MS;
 
 I see that the start method also goes into maintenance for us (exceeding
 the 600sec timeout), but the JVM stays alive and ultimately starts up.
 
 
 I guess the solution here would be to wrap the stop/startup into a
 script which would monitor the logs for I'm started/dead kind of
 message and the JVM process aliveness and only exit then. Been
 there, done that for Tomcat and JBOSS... Just one more plugin to
 add into another mega-script of mine ;)
 
 Now, if there are things I might do on SMF's side (like the question
 I came with originally - increase number of retries), I'd still be
 interested to know! ;)
 
 Thanks for discussion,
 //Jim
 
 On 2013-03-26 14:26, Jim Klimov wrote:
 On 2013-03-26 14:09, Michael Stapleton wrote:
 Hi Jim,
 
 Your SMF method is likely running asadmin.
 
 Have you tried using the asadmin command directly to stop the domain?
 It sounds like it could be the default 60 second socket timeout when
 asadmin attempts to contact glassfish.
 Network issues? Glassfish already down?
 
 
 Yes, the default SMF integration of glassfish invokes asadmin with
 such actions as start-domain and stop-domain. I do want to have it
 managed by SMF since that's catered for, and these actions to seem
 to include a timeout (60s for stop, 600s for start), both of which
 are exceeded in this instance; I am looking into GlassFish code now
 to see if these two timeouts are hard-coded or configurable (aren't
 according to the docs).
 
 From what I gather, when these 60 or 600 seconds elapse, the admin
 CLI verifies the server state. If it was stopping but still runs,
 or if it was starting but still doesn't accept connections, the
 asadmin program (a java class, ultimately) returns a non-zero exit
 code. Thus the SMF method fails (despite configured lack of SMF's
 own timeouts), even though the server happily starts or stops a
 few minutes past the existing asadmin timeout.
 
 I am inclined to think this is poor programming on glassfish side,
 but wonder what I can do to properly host and manage the appserver
 via SMF.
 
 PS: If I use asadmin directly, i.e. to restart the appserver, while
 SMF is also enabled, the death of a java process causes SMF to start
 it up again - and my manual invokation of restart also starts it.
 So the two java processes competing for same ports come into conflict.
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 

FWIW - Do you really need to use Glassfish, or could you get by with something 
simpler, like Tomcat?

Last year, I started writing a new ecommerce store using JSF and PrimeFaces.  I 
was running into all sorts of problems when I first started out - when I was 
trying to use Glassfish.  I switched to Tomcat7, and all those problems ceased 
- except for the work itself!

So, if you haven't already, you might want to ask yourself if you really need 
the additional functionality (and complexity, and problems) Glassfish offers.  

And if you do, after you get it working, please make a wiki page or something 
in case I have to go back to Glassfish.  []:-)

Thanks.



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Looking for capable notebook for OI and other OSes, small size and with real network.

2013-03-26 Thread Hans J. Albertsson
I've been looking at possible choices for a small note-book for OI and 
some sort of Windows in dual boot, possibly even an ultrabook thingie.


However, I keep running into disappointments:

The biggest one is the apparent scarcity of proper high-capacity GB 
wired ethernet.


Also, if I'd like to run such a thing under some Illumos based OS, I'd 
have to think very carefully.


I sort of liked the Dell XPS 13 Linux Developer's Edition; small, full 
HD screen, nice kbd, very thin and fairly large SSD disk.


But, running it under OI151a7??? I think that might be a bit unlikely to 
succeed!


So, what advice can people give me on this subject?

The Dell XPS 13 is the right price range, around €1000.
The size is very nice, the screen is VERY good..

So, there's a nice exterior target type, but what if I absolutely 
require to run OI and have a proper network connector, and PXE capacity?

And MUST run OI, with working wired network and graphics accel.



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Looking for capable notebook for OI and other OSes, small size and with real network.

2013-03-26 Thread Gregory S. Youngblood
If you find a good option I would like to know. The last good laptop I have 
personally used that worked great with open Indiana was my Lenovo T61p from 
2008. I still have it and it works well though it is a bit dated and big.

--
Sent from my Jelly Bean Galaxy Nexus

Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote:

I've been looking at possible choices for a small note-book for OI and 
some sort of Windows in dual boot, possibly even an ultrabook thingie.

However, I keep running into disappointments:

The biggest one is the apparent scarcity of proper high-capacity GB 
wired ethernet.

Also, if I'd like to run such a thing under some Illumos based OS, I'd 
have to think very carefully.

I sort of liked the Dell XPS 13 Linux Developer's Edition; small, full 
HD screen, nice kbd, very thin and fairly large SSD disk.

But, running it under OI151a7??? I think that might be a bit unlikely to 
succeed!

So, what advice can people give me on this subject?

The Dell XPS 13 is the right price range, around €1000.
The size is very nice, the screen is VERY good..

So, there's a nice exterior target type, but what if I absolutely 
require to run OI and have a proper network connector, and PXE capacity?
And MUST run OI, with working wired network and graphics accel.



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Looking for capable notebook for OI and other OSes, small size and with real network.

2013-03-26 Thread Luca De Pandis
The main problem of that laptop is the graphics card.
http://www.dell.com/us/business/p/xps-13-linux/pd

Intel HD 4000 *doesn't* work on OI. Only VESA.

I've bought a Compaq CQ58-205SL with an Intel HD Graphics and OI is not be
able to use the graphics acceleration due the lacks of the Intel's i915
(with KMS) driver.

Only Solaris 11 is able to take advantage of my GPU, *but* i've a bad
experience with that (Xorg freezes very often...especially with Firefox and
Compiz, many glitches etc.). For a desktop purpose is quite unusable.

If you want to use a laptop with an Intel HD GPU, then the only viable
Unix-like OS is GNU/Linux.

For the rest...i don't know if Intel Ivy Bridge (3rd generation) is
supported by Illumos.
Probably, many peripherals won't work (especially wireless).


Best regards,
Luca De Pandis



Message: 8
 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:16:15 +0100
 From: Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se
 To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
 openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Looking for capable notebook for OI and
 other OSes, small size and with real network.
 Message-ID: 5151f3ff.9050...@branneriet.se
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

 I've been looking at possible choices for a small note-book for OI and
 some sort of Windows in dual boot, possibly even an ultrabook thingie.

 However, I keep running into disappointments:

 The biggest one is the apparent scarcity of proper high-capacity GB
 wired ethernet.

 Also, if I'd like to run such a thing under some Illumos based OS, I'd
 have to think very carefully.

 I sort of liked the Dell XPS 13 Linux Developer's Edition; small, full
 HD screen, nice kbd, very thin and fairly large SSD disk.

 But, running it under OI151a7??? I think that might be a bit unlikely to
 succeed!

 So, what advice can people give me on this subject?

 The Dell XPS 13 is the right price range, around ?1000.
 The size is very nice, the screen is VERY good..

 So, there's a nice exterior target type, but what if I absolutely
 require to run OI and have a proper network connector, and PXE capacity?
 And MUST run OI, with working wired network and graphics accel.





 --

 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


 End of OpenIndiana-discuss Digest, Vol 32, Issue 64
 ***

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Looking for capable notebook for OI and other OSes, small size and with real network.

2013-03-26 Thread Milan Jurik
Hi,

some laptops with nVidia NVS could be usable.

Best regards,

Milan



On út, 2013-03-26 at 13:42 -0600, Gregory S. Youngblood wrote:
 If you find a good option I would like to know. The last good laptop I have 
 personally used that worked great with open Indiana was my Lenovo T61p from 
 2008. I still have it and it works well though it is a bit dated and big.
 
 --
 Sent from my Jelly Bean Galaxy Nexus
 
 Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote:
 
 I've been looking at possible choices for a small note-book for OI and 
 some sort of Windows in dual boot, possibly even an ultrabook thingie.
 
 However, I keep running into disappointments:
 
 The biggest one is the apparent scarcity of proper high-capacity GB 
 wired ethernet.
 
 Also, if I'd like to run such a thing under some Illumos based OS, I'd 
 have to think very carefully.
 
 I sort of liked the Dell XPS 13 Linux Developer's Edition; small, full 
 HD screen, nice kbd, very thin and fairly large SSD disk.
 
 But, running it under OI151a7??? I think that might be a bit unlikely to 
 succeed!
 
 So, what advice can people give me on this subject?
 
 The Dell XPS 13 is the right price range, around €1000.
 The size is very nice, the screen is VERY good..
 
 So, there's a nice exterior target type, but what if I absolutely 
 require to run OI and have a proper network connector, and PXE capacity?
 And MUST run OI, with working wired network and graphics accel.
 


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Looking for capable notebook for OI and other OSes, small size and with real network.

2013-03-26 Thread Calin Somoza

Hi Hans,

my Lenovo T510 works just fine running OI 151a7. PXE and Wifi worked 
instantly, but yes, it's not an ultrabook of course.


Calin

On 03/26/13 08:16 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:

I've been looking at possible choices for a small note-book for OI and
some sort of Windows in dual boot, possibly even an ultrabook thingie.

However, I keep running into disappointments:

The biggest one is the apparent scarcity of proper high-capacity GB
wired ethernet.

Also, if I'd like to run such a thing under some Illumos based OS, I'd
have to think very carefully.

I sort of liked the Dell XPS 13 Linux Developer's Edition; small, full
HD screen, nice kbd, very thin and fairly large SSD disk.

But, running it under OI151a7??? I think that might be a bit unlikely to
succeed!

So, what advice can people give me on this subject?

The Dell XPS 13 is the right price range, around €1000.
The size is very nice, the screen is VERY good..

So, there's a nice exterior target type, but what if I absolutely
require to run OI and have a proper network connector, and PXE capacity?
And MUST run OI, with working wired network and graphics accel.



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Xvnc on a SunRay server machine, got it working at last!

2013-03-26 Thread Hans J. Albertsson
For the longest time I've had Xvnc working perfectly as login facilities 
on a couple of mail+data servers, while I just couldn't get it to work 
on my SunRay Server machine... I just couldn't see what it was: I 
finally managed to get some logs and after a day actually managed to 
grep for the proper things, and as with everything well designed but 
less than perfectly documented, it was a simple thing.


It turns out that Xvnc wants the permissions on the directories 
/tmp/.X11-{pipe,unix} to be 0777 and on /var/run/xkb to be 0775.


SRSS installation sets them all more restrictively.

Opening them up just enough cleared away all my problems.

This isn't a security issue, if it had been I would have had to fiddle 
around with ACLs and stuff, I THINK.


In my environment, everything is behind impervious firewalls and anyone 
doing any damage will also be the person hurting from the damage. So 
this is fine.


I'll write something in the wiki, if I may. Just to put it on spinning rust.


P.S. I REALLY think I only needed to open up /var/run/xkb. I'll test 
some more later.




___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Passing USB and optical media from the machine running vncviewer to the host displaying on an Xvnc server?

2013-03-26 Thread Hans J. Albertsson
With SunRays, there's some capability of enabling users to access media 
and stuff connected via USB on the thin client on the SRS server.


Is there any way at all to do something similar, enabling a remote host 
being accessed via vncviewer+Xvnc to read and write to a USB stick so on 
the vncviewer PC?? And maybe even play audio on the PC??


I know one could export a file system via nfs or smb/cifs, but I mean in 
a way that doesn't need the displaying PC to cooperate quite so much.




___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Looking for capable notebook for OI and other OSes, small size and with real network.

2013-03-26 Thread Jonathan Adams
Don'cha just love dells website ...

asked for Ultrabook (i7+, 8Gb+ memory, Dedicated Graphics (Nvidia GT
630M 1Gb), 11-14 ...)

sbnb1441 and sbnb1440 e-codes ... I've tried comparing them, and the
only difference appears to be about £350 in price ... :)

USB 3 though, so you won't be able to use an external mouse ...

I have a dell laptop working with OI, but it's nothing like an Ultrabook :)

Jon

On 26 March 2013 20:02, Calin Somoza ca...@calin.de wrote:
 Hi Hans,

 my Lenovo T510 works just fine running OI 151a7. PXE and Wifi worked
 instantly, but yes, it's not an ultrabook of course.

 Calin


 On 03/26/13 08:16 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:

 I've been looking at possible choices for a small note-book for OI and
 some sort of Windows in dual boot, possibly even an ultrabook thingie.

 However, I keep running into disappointments:

 The biggest one is the apparent scarcity of proper high-capacity GB
 wired ethernet.

 Also, if I'd like to run such a thing under some Illumos based OS, I'd
 have to think very carefully.

 I sort of liked the Dell XPS 13 Linux Developer's Edition; small, full
 HD screen, nice kbd, very thin and fairly large SSD disk.

 But, running it under OI151a7??? I think that might be a bit unlikely to
 succeed!

 So, what advice can people give me on this subject?

 The Dell XPS 13 is the right price range, around €1000.
 The size is very nice, the screen is VERY good..

 So, there's a nice exterior target type, but what if I absolutely
 require to run OI and have a proper network connector, and PXE capacity?
 And MUST run OI, with working wired network and graphics accel.



 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] I'm back with a physical machine but encounter the BLACK SCREEN as well

2013-03-26 Thread WarGrey Gyoudmon Ju
One year ago, I asked for helping about the incompatibilities of networking
virtualization between OI and vbox. I thought Using a physical machine to
play with Illumos-based System is the most proper way. Now I format the
entire hard disk of my 2010-mid Macbook Pro for OpenIndiana b157a7.

My experience in using OI virtualbox was not as well as it should be. The
main trouble is about the fucking GNOME, it froze frequently, sometimes I
could reboot via ssh or just push the power-off button. Okay there are more
important things than struggling with the GUI so I disabled it.

Now in the physical machine, the GNOME suddenly goes black frequently as
well, even worse, rebooting it via ssh does not work. I figure that the
root cause might be the switching between two video cards. Indeed 2010-mid
Macbook Pro might intermittently freeze or stop displaying video in the
past time, and disabling compiz animation (which enabled default) reduces
the frequency effectively.

Can you help me to locate the root cause more reasonable?
It seems that it does not dump cores and lacks logs, maybe I deal with
 these facilities in a wrong way.

I don't think disabling the GUI is a good idea.
In virtual machine OpenIndiana was a server system, and now it is a
workstation aim at scientific computing and visualizing.
Compiz is good for effective settings rather than useless animations.

By the way, How is the DE development going?
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Anyone using OpenIndiana in production?

2013-03-26 Thread Gerry Weaver
Hello All,

I have been checking out OpenIndiana as a possible file server and KVM host. I 
have read in a couple of places that the OS is stable despite its development 
release status. Would anyone be so kind as to share their experiences using 
OpenIndiana in production? My testing so far shows it to be rock solid.

BTW: Many thanks to those who are putting the hard work into this. I think it 
has a lot of potential.

Thanks,
Gerry


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] *****SPAM***** Re: Anyone using OpenIndiana in production?

2013-03-26 Thread Christopher Chan
Spam detection software, running on the system portal.local, has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk for details.

Content preview:  Hi Gerry, I use OI as a samba file server. Data wise, I have
   had zero issues with OI. File serving wise, I have had my share of fist 
shaking.
   Currently samba is kind of unmaintained. The repository has an old and 
problematic
   version of samba (3.5.7) although I have been involved in reporting issues
   with that version and also testing patches for the build tree for newer 
versions.
   In the end, I have had to 'roll my own' by installing from source over the
   package binaries. The package system does not give you the flexibility of
   rolling your own packages unless you start your own consolidation or pretty
   much fork your own. [...] 

Content analysis details:   (7.6 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name  description
 -- --
 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL   SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
 0.1 RDNS_NONE  Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS
 6.8 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Anyone using OpenIndiana in production?

2013-03-26 Thread Geoff Nordli

On 13-03-26 07:29 PM, Gerry Weaver wrote:

Hello All,

I have been checking out OpenIndiana as a possible file server and KVM host. I 
have read in a couple of places that the OS is stable despite its development 
release status. Would anyone be so kind as to share their experiences using 
OpenIndiana in production? My testing so far shows it to be rock solid.

BTW: Many thanks to those who are putting the hard work into this. I think it 
has a lot of potential.



I have a few customers that are running an all-in-one OI+VirtualBox 
system and it has been going well.  They are running a combination of 
Linux and Windows guests.  They are not in a high workload environment.


Geoff


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss