Hi,
http://os-solaris.ru/en/driver-printer-canon-pixma-ip1500-openindiana-opensolaris/
May be the article and the package will be useful for somebody.
Andrey Sokolov
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?65756-Solaris-11-source-code-leaked
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Oracle-Solaris-11-Kernel-Source-Leaked-241597.shtml
Has this been leaked? do we want to try to look/keep well clear in
order to see where ZFS changes are made with encryption, to enable
On 19.12.11. 15:38, Jonathan Adams wrote:
http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?65756-Solaris-11-source-code-leaked
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Oracle-Solaris-11-Kernel-Source-Leaked-241597.shtml
Has this been leaked? do we want to try to look/keep well clear in
order to see where ZFS
according to the reports I listed, the general consensus is that it's
licensed under CDDL ... but I haven't looked at it to confirm.
Jon
On 19 December 2011 15:53, Chris Ridd chrisr...@mac.com wrote:
On 19 Dec 2011, at 14:38, Jonathan Adams wrote:
I'm assuming that a disgruntled employee made this dump out of
frustration with the current situation. Still, given that the CDDL
licenses on most files are almost certainly simply leftovers from the
Sun era, the code is useless to OpenIndiana and not legally binding.
I'd even go as far as to say
it wouldn't need to be a disgruntled Oracle employee, they still deal
with Intel, and other manufacturers ... just needs to be someone with
access to the code and no emotional ties to Oracle.
If code is tagged with the CDDL, can that code not be CDDL? if so a
third party with no involvement, or
This seems potentially bad all the way around to me. Hopefully this turns out
to be a real, officially blessed release and not a leak.
Given the question as to the origin of this code drop, and the potential huge
downside if it turns out to be a leak and not an official code drop, then I
would
Gregory,
Must say, this was my first thought of it. It could be a fairly insidious way
to 'infect' the process... Even without 20 years' experience in IP Law, it's
easy to imagine lots of (unpleasant) discussion about 'Derivative Works'.
Lou Picciano
- Original Message -
From:
I'm trying to clean up on my system after creating (and then removing) a
bunch of zones. Everything worked fine so far, but now I can't remove the
vnics I created. I did:
1. ifconfig vnic0 down
2. ifconfig vnic0 unplumb
3. dladm delete-vnic vnic1
on step 3 I get: dladm: vnic deletion failed:
On 12/19/11 07:53, Chris Ridd wrote:
But what if the changed code in the leaked code was licensed under the CDDL.
Would that make it OK to reuse outside of Oracle?
You're asking for legal advice. Any legal advice you get on this list
is worth less than what you paid for it.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 19:19, Mark Creamer white...@gmail.com wrote:
1. ifconfig vnic0 down
2. ifconfig vnic0 unplumb
3. dladm delete-vnic vnic1
on step 3 I get: dladm: vnic deletion failed: link busy
It seems pretty obvious, unless those commands aren't copy/pasted. You
work on vnic0 on
Oh sorry that's a typo. Sorry to confuse...
Line 3 should read dladm delete-vnic vnic0
But I do get the deletion error even when I actually type it correctly :-)
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Jeppe Toustrup openindi...@tenzer.dkwrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 19:19, Mark Creamer
Hi,
Am 19.12.2011 19:20 schrieb Mark Creamer white...@gmail.com:
I'm trying to clean up on my system after creating (and then removing) a
bunch of zones. Everything worked fine so far, but now I can't remove the
vnics I created. I did:
1. ifconfig vnic0 down
2. ifconfig vnic0 unplumb
3.
Are you sure you capture all of the relevant traffic in both tests?
In the zip test (which works as you expect?) I don't see any
SMB operations setting the file timestamp (on iexplore.PNG?)
In the rar test, I don't see any files extracted at all. Hmm...
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Nilsen,
14 matches
Mail list logo
